CVE-2016-4460 (GCVE-0-2016-4460)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-08-22 18:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 00:32
VLAI
Summary
Apache Pony Mail 0.6c through 0.8b allows remote attackers to bypass authentication.
CWE
  • n/a
References
URL Tags
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100449 vdb-entryx_refsource_BID
http://markmail.org/message/jy7o23cppny26icu x_refsource_CONFIRM
Date Public
2016-08-02 00:00
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T00:32:25.404Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "100449",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100449"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://markmail.org/message/jy7o23cppny26icu"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2016-08-02T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Apache Pony Mail 0.6c through 0.8b allows remote attackers to bypass authentication."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-08-24T09:57:01.000Z",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "100449",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100449"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "http://markmail.org/message/jy7o23cppny26icu"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2016-4460",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Apache Pony Mail 0.6c through 0.8b allows remote attackers to bypass authentication."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "100449",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100449"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://markmail.org/message/jy7o23cppny26icu",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "http://markmail.org/message/jy7o23cppny26icu"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2016-4460",
    "datePublished": "2017-08-22T18:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2016-05-02T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T00:32:25.404Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2016-4460",
      "date": "2026-09-22",
      "epss": "0.06097",
      "percentile": "0.931"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:pony_mail:0.6c:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "348A1046-8ABD-4ADF-A33D-B0EF6461F76B",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:pony_mail:0.7b:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "E4003C18-54E7-4E03-B9CB-65A8A9BDA9C4",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:pony_mail:0.8b:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "8E38D5F7-71E5-4900-B7B8-7CC9443DA0F0",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Apache Pony Mail 0.6c through 0.8b allows remote attackers to bypass authentication."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "Apache Pony Mail 0.6c en su versi\u00f3n 0.8b permite que atacantes remotos omitan la autenticaci\u00f3n."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2016-4460",
        "lastModified": "2026-05-13T00:24:29.033",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV2": [
            {
              "acInsufInfo": true,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "cvssData": {
                "accessComplexity": "LOW",
                "accessVector": "NETWORK",
                "authentication": "NONE",
                "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "baseScore": 7.5,
                "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
                "version": "2.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
              "impactScore": 6.4,
              "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
              "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
              "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary",
              "userInteractionRequired": false
            }
          ],
          "cvssMetricV30": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 9.8,
                "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
                "version": "3.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
              "impactScore": 5.9,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary"
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2017-08-22T18:29:00.340",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
            "tags": [
              "Mailing List",
              "Patch",
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "http://markmail.org/message/jy7o23cppny26icu"
          },
          {
            "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
            "tags": [
              "Third Party Advisory",
              "VDB Entry"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100449"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Mailing List",
              "Patch",
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "http://markmail.org/message/jy7o23cppny26icu"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Third Party Advisory",
              "VDB Entry"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100449"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Modified",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-287"
              }
            ],
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…