CVE-2015-9232 (GCVE-0-2015-9232)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-09-20 22:00 – Updated: 2024-09-16 18:34
VLAI
Summary
The Good for Enterprise application 3.0.0.415 for Android does not use signature protection for its Authentication Delegation API intent. Also, the Good Dynamic application activation process does not attempt to detect malicious activation attempts involving modified names beginning with a com.good.gdgma substring. Consequently, an attacker could obtain access to intranet data. This issue is only relevant in cases where the user has already downloaded a malicious Android application.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
mitre CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard E 29/100 over 2193 records in the last 180 days details
References
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T08:43:42.577Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://community.blackberry.com/community/blogs/blog/2015/10/02/what-you-need-to-know-modzero-insecure-application-coupling"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.modzero.ch/advisories/MZ-15-03-GOOD-Auth-Delegation.txt"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/536543"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The Good for Enterprise application 3.0.0.415 for Android does not use signature protection for its Authentication Delegation API intent. Also, the Good Dynamic application activation process does not attempt to detect malicious activation attempts involving modified names beginning with a com.good.gdgma substring. Consequently, an attacker could obtain access to intranet data. This issue is only relevant in cases where the user has already downloaded a malicious Android application."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-09-20T22:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://community.blackberry.com/community/blogs/blog/2015/10/02/what-you-need-to-know-modzero-insecure-application-coupling"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.modzero.ch/advisories/MZ-15-03-GOOD-Auth-Delegation.txt"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/536543"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2015-9232",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The Good for Enterprise application 3.0.0.415 for Android does not use signature protection for its Authentication Delegation API intent. Also, the Good Dynamic application activation process does not attempt to detect malicious activation attempts involving modified names beginning with a com.good.gdgma substring. Consequently, an attacker could obtain access to intranet data. This issue is only relevant in cases where the user has already downloaded a malicious Android application."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://community.blackberry.com/community/blogs/blog/2015/10/02/what-you-need-to-know-modzero-insecure-application-coupling",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://community.blackberry.com/community/blogs/blog/2015/10/02/what-you-need-to-know-modzero-insecure-application-coupling"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://www.modzero.ch/advisories/MZ-15-03-GOOD-Auth-Delegation.txt",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://www.modzero.ch/advisories/MZ-15-03-GOOD-Auth-Delegation.txt"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/536543",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/536543"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2015-9232",
    "datePublished": "2017-09-20T22:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2017-09-20T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T18:34:39.175Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2015-9232",
      "date": "2026-11-07",
      "epss": "0.00922",
      "percentile": "0.60575"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:good:good_for_enterprise:3.0.0.415:*:*:*:*:android:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "E9AF057E-517E-4440-815C-3A9BF0510CCA",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "The Good for Enterprise application 3.0.0.415 for Android does not use signature protection for its Authentication Delegation API intent. Also, the Good Dynamic application activation process does not attempt to detect malicious activation attempts involving modified names beginning with a com.good.gdgma substring. Consequently, an attacker could obtain access to intranet data. This issue is only relevant in cases where the user has already downloaded a malicious Android application."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "La aplicaci\u00f3n Good for Enterprise 3.0.0.415 para Android no emplea protecci\u00f3n de firmas para su intent API Authentication Delegation. Adem\u00e1s, el proceso de activaci\u00f3n de la aplicaci\u00f3n Good Dynamic no intenta detectar intentos de activaci\u00f3n maliciosa relacionados con los nombres modificados que comienzan con una substring com.good.gdgma. Por lo tanto, un atacante podr\u00eda obtener acceso a los datos de la Intranet. Este problema s\u00f3lo es relevante en los casos en los que el usuario ya ha descargado una aplicaci\u00f3n Android maliciosa."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2015-9232",
        "lastModified": "2026-05-13T00:24:29.033",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV2": [
            {
              "acInsufInfo": false,
              "baseSeverity": "LOW",
              "cvssData": {
                "accessComplexity": "HIGH",
                "accessVector": "NETWORK",
                "authentication": "NONE",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 2.6,
                "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "integrityImpact": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
                "version": "2.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 4.9,
              "impactScore": 2.9,
              "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
              "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
              "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary",
              "userInteractionRequired": true
            }
          ],
          "cvssMetricV30": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 5.3,
                "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "NONE",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
                "version": "3.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
              "impactScore": 3.6,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary"
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2017-09-20T22:29:00.197",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "cve@mitre.org",
            "tags": [
              "Exploit",
              "Mitigation",
              "Third Party Advisory",
              "VDB Entry"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/536543"
          },
          {
            "source": "cve@mitre.org",
            "tags": [
              "Third Party Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://community.blackberry.com/community/blogs/blog/2015/10/02/what-you-need-to-know-modzero-insecure-application-coupling"
          },
          {
            "source": "cve@mitre.org",
            "tags": [
              "Exploit",
              "Mitigation",
              "Third Party Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.modzero.ch/advisories/MZ-15-03-GOOD-Auth-Delegation.txt"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Exploit",
              "Mitigation",
              "Third Party Advisory",
              "VDB Entry"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/536543"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Third Party Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://community.blackberry.com/community/blogs/blog/2015/10/02/what-you-need-to-know-modzero-insecure-application-coupling"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Exploit",
              "Mitigation",
              "Third Party Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.modzero.ch/advisories/MZ-15-03-GOOD-Auth-Delegation.txt"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
        "vulnStatus": "Modified",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-345"
              }
            ],
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.