CVE-2015-4321 (GCVE-0-2015-4321)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2015-08-20 10:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 06:11
VLAI
Summary
The Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.3(1.50), 9.3(2.100), 9.3(3), and 9.4(1) mishandles cases where an IP address belongs to an internal interface but is also in the ASA routing table, which allows remote attackers to bypass uRPF validation via spoofed packets, aka Bug ID CSCuv60724.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
cisco CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard C 66/100 over 434 records in the last 180 days details
References
URL Tags
http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033265 vdb-entryx_refsource_SECTRACK
http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.… vendor-advisoryx_refsource_CISCO
Date Public
2015-08-12 00:00
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T06:11:12.892Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "1033265",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_SECTRACK",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033265"
          },
          {
            "name": "20150812 Cisco ASA Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) Bypass Vulnerability",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_CISCO",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=40440"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2015-08-12T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.3(1.50), 9.3(2.100), 9.3(3), and 9.4(1) mishandles cases where an IP address belongs to an internal interface but is also in the ASA routing table, which allows remote attackers to bypass uRPF validation via spoofed packets, aka Bug ID CSCuv60724."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-09-20T09:57:01.000Z",
        "orgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
        "shortName": "cisco"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "1033265",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_SECTRACK"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033265"
        },
        {
          "name": "20150812 Cisco ASA Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) Bypass Vulnerability",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_CISCO"
          ],
          "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=40440"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "psirt@cisco.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2015-4321",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.3(1.50), 9.3(2.100), 9.3(3), and 9.4(1) mishandles cases where an IP address belongs to an internal interface but is also in the ASA routing table, which allows remote attackers to bypass uRPF validation via spoofed packets, aka Bug ID CSCuv60724."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "1033265",
              "refsource": "SECTRACK",
              "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033265"
            },
            {
              "name": "20150812 Cisco ASA Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) Bypass Vulnerability",
              "refsource": "CISCO",
              "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=40440"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
    "assignerShortName": "cisco",
    "cveId": "CVE-2015-4321",
    "datePublished": "2015-08-20T10:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2015-06-04T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T06:11:12.892Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2015-4321",
      "date": "2026-11-08",
      "epss": "0.01748",
      "percentile": "0.77976"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.3\\(1.50\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "1E044883-9952-477A-B2AA-3E0BB90C96A0",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.3\\(2.100\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "6F4A28B7-87A2-464A-92A8-644E3F7D13D7",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.3\\(3\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "63FECF84-4FFB-443E-8529-A1FA4D1D821C",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.4\\(1\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "B854F299-3798-41E7-9C02-17729B75B01C",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "The Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.3(1.50), 9.3(2.100), 9.3(3), and 9.4(1) mishandles cases where an IP address belongs to an internal interface but is also in the ASA routing table, which allows remote attackers to bypass uRPF validation via spoofed packets, aka Bug ID CSCuv60724."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "Vulnerabilidad en la implementaci\u00f3n Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) en Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.3(1.50), 9.3(2.100), 9.3(3) y 9.4(1), no maneja correctamente casos en los que una direcci\u00f3n IP pertenece a una interfaz interna pero tambi\u00e9n est\u00e1 en la tabla ASA de enrutamiento, lo que permite a atacantes remotos eludir la validaci\u00f3n uRPF a trav\u00e9s de paquetes suplantados, tambi\u00e9n conocida como Bug ID CSCuv60724."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2015-4321",
        "lastModified": "2026-05-06T22:30:45.220",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV2": [
            {
              "acInsufInfo": false,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "cvssData": {
                "accessComplexity": "LOW",
                "accessVector": "NETWORK",
                "authentication": "NONE",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 5.0,
                "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "integrityImpact": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
                "version": "2.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
              "impactScore": 2.9,
              "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
              "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
              "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary",
              "userInteractionRequired": false
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2015-08-20T10:59:09.950",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
            "tags": [
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=40440"
          },
          {
            "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
            "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033265"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=40440"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033265"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@cisco.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Modified",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-20"
              }
            ],
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.