CVE-2014-6567 (GCVE-0-2014-6567)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2015-01-21 15:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 12:17
VLAI
Summary
Unspecified vulnerability in the Core RDBMS component in Oracle Database Server 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.3, 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1, and 12.1.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information is from the January 2015 CPU. Oracle has not commented on the researcher's claim that this is a stack-based buffer overflow in DBMS_AW.EXECUTE, which allows code execution via a long Current Directory Alias (CDA) command.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
oracle CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard C 69/100 over 3977 records in the last 180 days details
References
Date Public
2015-01-17 00:00
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T12:17:24.337Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2015-1972971.html"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.databaseforensics.com/Oracle_Jan2015_CPU.pdf"
          },
          {
            "name": "1031572",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_SECTRACK",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031572"
          },
          {
            "name": "72134",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72134"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2015-01-17T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Unspecified vulnerability in the Core RDBMS component in Oracle Database Server 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.3, 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1, and 12.1.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors.  NOTE: the previous information is from the January 2015 CPU. Oracle has not commented on the researcher\u0027s claim that this is a stack-based buffer overflow in DBMS_AW.EXECUTE, which allows code execution via a long Current Directory Alias (CDA) command."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2016-11-25T19:57:01.000Z",
        "orgId": "43595867-4340-4103-b7a2-9a5208d29a85",
        "shortName": "oracle"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2015-1972971.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.databaseforensics.com/Oracle_Jan2015_CPU.pdf"
        },
        {
          "name": "1031572",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_SECTRACK"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031572"
        },
        {
          "name": "72134",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72134"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2014-6567",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Unspecified vulnerability in the Core RDBMS component in Oracle Database Server 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.3, 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1, and 12.1.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors.  NOTE: the previous information is from the January 2015 CPU. Oracle has not commented on the researcher\u0027s claim that this is a stack-based buffer overflow in DBMS_AW.EXECUTE, which allows code execution via a long Current Directory Alias (CDA) command."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2015-1972971.html",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2015-1972971.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.databaseforensics.com/Oracle_Jan2015_CPU.pdf",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://www.databaseforensics.com/Oracle_Jan2015_CPU.pdf"
            },
            {
              "name": "1031572",
              "refsource": "SECTRACK",
              "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031572"
            },
            {
              "name": "72134",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72134"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "43595867-4340-4103-b7a2-9a5208d29a85",
    "assignerShortName": "oracle",
    "cveId": "CVE-2014-6567",
    "datePublished": "2015-01-21T15:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2014-09-17T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T12:17:24.337Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2014-6567",
      "date": "2026-11-13",
      "epss": "0.04618",
      "percentile": "0.91828"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:database_server:11.1.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "EDEDE937-C3D7-421C-9F70-F546AB823E1D",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:database_server:11.2.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "165A1F85-076B-4216-8EF8-D67E6EC63A6B",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:database_server:11.2.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "C1E11A25-C7CE-49DF-99CA-352FD21B8230",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:database_server:12.1.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "5A7D10EB-D98F-4B80-AB9F-D8A9FC813E1C",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:database_server:12.1.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "4F3D40B7-925C-413D-AFF3-60BF330D5BC2",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Unspecified vulnerability in the Core RDBMS component in Oracle Database Server 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.3, 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1, and 12.1.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors.  NOTE: the previous information is from the January 2015 CPU. Oracle has not commented on the researcher\u0027s claim that this is a stack-based buffer overflow in DBMS_AW.EXECUTE, which allows code execution via a long Current Directory Alias (CDA) command."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "Vulnerabilidad no especificada en el componente Core RDBMS de Oracle Database Server 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.3, 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1 y 12.1.0.2 permite a usuarios remotos autenticados afectar la confidencialidad, integridad, y disponibilidad a trav\u00e9s de vectores desconocidos. NOTA: la informaci\u00f3n anterior es de la CPU de enero del 2015. Oracle no ha comentado sobre la declaraci\u00f3n del investigador original de que esto se trata de un desbordamiento de buffer basado en pila en DBMS_AW.EXECUTE, lo que permite la extensi\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo a trav\u00e9s de un comando Current Directory Alias (CDA) largo."
          }
        ],
        "evaluatorComment": "Per: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2015-1972971.html\n\nThe CVSS Score is 9.0 only on Windows for Database versions prior to 12c. The CVSS Base Score is 6.5 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability are Partial+) for Database 12c on Windows and for all versions of Database on Linux, Unix and other platforms.",
        "id": "CVE-2014-6567",
        "lastModified": "2026-05-06T22:30:45.220",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV2": [
            {
              "acInsufInfo": false,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "cvssData": {
                "accessComplexity": "LOW",
                "accessVector": "NETWORK",
                "authentication": "SINGLE",
                "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
                "baseScore": 9.0,
                "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
                "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
                "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C",
                "version": "2.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
              "impactScore": 10.0,
              "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
              "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
              "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary",
              "userInteractionRequired": false
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2015-01-21T15:28:06.527",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
            "tags": [
              "Patch"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.databaseforensics.com/Oracle_Jan2015_CPU.pdf"
          },
          {
            "source": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
            "tags": [
              "Patch",
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2015-1972971.html"
          },
          {
            "source": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72134"
          },
          {
            "source": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
            "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031572"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Patch"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.databaseforensics.com/Oracle_Jan2015_CPU.pdf"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Patch",
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2015-1972971.html"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72134"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031572"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Modified",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
              }
            ],
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.