CVE-2013-0945 (GCVE-0-2013-0945)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2013-05-03 10:00 – Updated: 2024-09-17 00:50
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
EMC Avamar Client before 6.1.101-89 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/20… | mailing-listx_refsource_BUGTRAQ |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T14:41:48.475Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "20130502 ESA-2013-035: EMC Avamar Client Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-05/0014.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "EMC Avamar Client before 6.1.101-89 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2013-05-03T10:00:00.000Z",
"orgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
"shortName": "dell"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "20130502 ESA-2013-035: EMC Avamar Client Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-05/0014.html"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security_alert@emc.com",
"ID": "CVE-2013-0945",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "EMC Avamar Client before 6.1.101-89 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "20130502 ESA-2013-035: EMC Avamar Client Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-05/0014.html"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
"assignerShortName": "dell",
"cveId": "CVE-2013-0945",
"datePublished": "2013-05-03T10:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2013-01-09T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-17T00:50:49.519Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2013-0945",
"date": "2026-09-22",
"epss": "0.00858",
"percentile": "0.56926"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "36EE497F-10AD-455C-A4F3-10762CBD8FD9",
"versionEndIncluding": "6.1.101-87",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "012C16C2-8904-4584-8B22-2D311388A7CF",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "3F0D5A62-9AF8-4E4B-A208-7772386794A9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "56741A4C-2A47-47D5-BA57-73CF24F41267",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0:sp1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "866AFF0F-F25C-4B11-AAD3-5AE12257CAEF",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0:sp2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "13D2AF12-9343-4961-9FDE-BEAD12E528B8",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0.0-407:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A853F02F-67BA-42E6-8D31-78EEA579A7E7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0.4-26:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E8F939D7-8E59-426A-8B80-30E6BA7384F4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A3ED3F62-A7F2-4E23-9000-1E0FCBC6B5B5",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "EMC Avamar Client before 6.1.101-89 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "EMC Avamar Client anterior a v6.1.101-89 no verifica que el nombre del servidor coincide con un nombre de dominio en el nombre com\u00fan del sujeto (CN) o el campo subjectAltName del certificado X.509, permitiendo a los atacantes de hombre-en-medio (man-in-the-middle) falsificar servidores SSL mediante un certificado v\u00e1lido de su elecci\u00f3n."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2013-0945",
"lastModified": "2026-04-29T01:13:23.040",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 10.0,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2013-05-03T11:57:44.797",
"references": [
{
"source": "security_alert@emc.com",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-05/0014.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-05/0014.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security_alert@emc.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-20"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…