CVE-2011-5093 (GCVE-0-2011-5093)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2012-06-04 19:00 – Updated: 2024-09-16 23:46
VLAI
Summary
Best Practical Solutions RT 4.x before 4.0.6 does not properly implement the DisallowExecuteCode option, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and execute arbitrary code by leveraging access to a privileged account, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-4458 and CVE-2011-5092.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T00:23:40.198Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "[rt-announce] 20120522 RT 3.8.12 Released - Security Release",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000203.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[rt-announce] 20120522 RT 4.0.6 Released - Security Release",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000204.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[rt-announce] 20120522 Security vulnerabilities in RT",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000202.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Best Practical Solutions RT 4.x before 4.0.6 does not properly implement the DisallowExecuteCode option, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and execute arbitrary code by leveraging access to a privileged account, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-4458 and CVE-2011-5092."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2012-06-04T19:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "[rt-announce] 20120522 RT 3.8.12 Released - Security Release",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000203.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[rt-announce] 20120522 RT 4.0.6 Released - Security Release",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000204.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[rt-announce] 20120522 Security vulnerabilities in RT",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000202.html"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2011-5093",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Best Practical Solutions RT 4.x before 4.0.6 does not properly implement the DisallowExecuteCode option, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and execute arbitrary code by leveraging access to a privileged account, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-4458 and CVE-2011-5092."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "[rt-announce] 20120522 RT 3.8.12 Released - Security Release",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000203.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[rt-announce] 20120522 RT 4.0.6 Released - Security Release",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000204.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[rt-announce] 20120522 Security vulnerabilities in RT",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000202.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2011-5093",
    "datePublished": "2012-06-04T19:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2012-06-04T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T23:46:51.144Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2011-5093",
      "date": "2026-08-27",
      "epss": "0.02087",
      "percentile": "0.80202"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2011-5093\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2012-06-04T19:55:01.947\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-29T01:13:23.040\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Best Practical Solutions RT 4.x before 4.0.6 does not properly implement the DisallowExecuteCode option, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and execute arbitrary code by leveraging access to a privileged account, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-4458 and CVE-2011-5092.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Best Practical Solutions RT 4.x anteriores a 4.0.6 no implementa apropiadamente la opci\u00f3n DisallowExecuteCode, lo que permite a usuarios autenticados remotos evitar las restricciones de acceso previstas y ejecutar c\u00f3digo arbitrario utilizando el acceso a una cuenta con privilegios. Una vulnerabilidad distinta a la CVE-2011-4458 y CVE-2011-5092.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"SINGLE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.0,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-264\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:3.8.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C35364B8-6BB7-439D-9450-08FB11639E76\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:4.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F84987A7-103B-4473-9D4F-9F28880F6D9F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:4.0.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9E220C7C-D32C-4ED1-A056-074576B7B504\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:4.0.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"57A903C6-3C9F-47A0-92F7-D5272B2622AC\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:4.0.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"67EBD0AE-1A91-4690-8A07-0FB7342768FE\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:4.0.0:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A1217A3C-2302-4E3B-BF35-4B16271A6FF6\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:4.0.0:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A72E5649-26E5-47DE-9CB4-019FEC8AF13E\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:4.0.0:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"51E06E3C-4504-4325-BD89-9102315858C4\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:4.0.0:rc7:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8A1286FE-DB7C-48B1-82A9-A23C82984A21\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:4.0.0:rc8:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5C89298A-DA7A-4DDD-A420-5B5BC0ABAF7E\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:4.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"60F0CE6D-3DFA-4432-9615-78718C1D5583\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:4.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A65F27F5-D134-4B94-BF93-CE32065B75B2\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:4.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E1D6E744-5181-4E94-8B9B-3CA83648C7A7\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:4.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5315BD2E-AE5F-49F9-8451-0D2D64CE56B1\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:4.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"087B001A-78B6-46EB-8623-D8C680243867\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000202.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000203.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000204.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000202.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000203.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000204.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]}]}}"
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.