CVE-2008-3280 (GCVE-0-2008-3280)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2021-05-21 19:23 – Updated: 2024-08-07 09:28
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
It was found that various OpenID Providers (OPs) had TLS Server Certificates that used weak keys, as a result of the Debian Predictable Random Number Generator (CVE-2008-0166). In combination with the DNS Cache Poisoning issue (CVE-2008-1447) and the fact that almost all SSL/TLS implementations do not consult CRLs (currently an untracked issue), this means that it is impossible to rely on these OPs.
Severity
5.9 (Medium)
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-security… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5720 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T09:28:42.000Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-security/2008-August/000942.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5720"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "openid",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "unknown"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "It was found that various OpenID Providers (OPs) had TLS Server Certificates that used weak keys, as a result of the Debian Predictable Random Number Generator (CVE-2008-0166). In combination with the DNS Cache Poisoning issue (CVE-2008-1447) and the fact that almost all SSL/TLS implementations do not consult CRLs (currently an untracked issue), this means that it is impossible to rely on these OPs."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-338",
"description": "CWE-338",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2021-05-21T19:23:55.000Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-security/2008-August/000942.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5720"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2008-3280",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "openid",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "unknown"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "It was found that various OpenID Providers (OPs) had TLS Server Certificates that used weak keys, as a result of the Debian Predictable Random Number Generator (CVE-2008-0166). In combination with the DNS Cache Poisoning issue (CVE-2008-1447) and the fact that almost all SSL/TLS implementations do not consult CRLs (currently an untracked issue), this means that it is impossible to rely on these OPs."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-338"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-security/2008-August/000942.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-security/2008-August/000942.html"
},
{
"name": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5720",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5720"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2008-3280",
"datePublished": "2021-05-21T19:23:55.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2008-07-24T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T09:28:42.000Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2008-3280",
"date": "2026-09-26",
"epss": "0.03951",
"percentile": "0.90053"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openid:openid:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "21ACAE04-0500-4B20-8F63-87D22A9A0563",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "It was found that various OpenID Providers (OPs) had TLS Server Certificates that used weak keys, as a result of the Debian Predictable Random Number Generator (CVE-2008-0166). In combination with the DNS Cache Poisoning issue (CVE-2008-1447) and the fact that almost all SSL/TLS implementations do not consult CRLs (currently an untracked issue), this means that it is impossible to rely on these OPs."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Se detect\u00f3 que varios OpenID Providers (OP) ten\u00edan TLS Server Certificates que usaban claves d\u00e9biles, como resultado del Debian Predictable Random Number Generator (CVE-2008-0166).\u0026#xa0;En combinaci\u00f3n con el problema de Envenenamiento de la cach\u00e9 de DNS (CVE-2008-1447) y el hecho de que casi todas las implementaciones de SSL / TLS no consultan las CRL (actualmente un problema sin seguimiento), esto significa que es imposible confiar en estos OP"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2008-3280",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T00:48:52.517",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2021-05-21T20:15:07.430",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Mitigation",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-security/2008-August/000942.html"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5720"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Mitigation",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-security/2008-August/000942.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5720"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-338"
}
],
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…