CVE-2006-3778 (GCVE-0-2006-3778)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2006-07-21 18:00 – Updated: 2024-08-07 18:39
VLAI
Summary
IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) "Save As Draft" option is used or (2) a "," (comma) is inside the "phrase" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
URL Tags
http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516 vdb-entryx_refsource_SECTRACK
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475&u… x_refsource_CONFIRM
http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819 vdb-entryx_refsource_SECTRACK
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899&u… x_refsource_CONFIRM
http://secunia.com/advisories/21096 third-party-advisoryx_refsource_SECUNIA
Date Public
2006-07-18 00:00
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T18:39:54.132Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "1016516",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_SECTRACK",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602"
          },
          {
            "name": "1016819",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_SECTRACK",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386"
          },
          {
            "name": "21096",
            "tags": [
              "third-party-advisory",
              "x_refsource_SECUNIA",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21096"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2006-07-18T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) \"Save As Draft\" option is used or (2) a \",\" (comma) is inside the \"phrase\" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2006-09-15T09:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "1016516",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_SECTRACK"
          ],
          "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602"
        },
        {
          "name": "1016819",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_SECTRACK"
          ],
          "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386"
        },
        {
          "name": "21096",
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory",
            "x_refsource_SECUNIA"
          ],
          "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21096"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2006-3778",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) \"Save As Draft\" option is used or (2) a \",\" (comma) is inside the \"phrase\" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "1016516",
              "refsource": "SECTRACK",
              "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602"
            },
            {
              "name": "1016819",
              "refsource": "SECTRACK",
              "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386"
            },
            {
              "name": "21096",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21096"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2006-3778",
    "datePublished": "2006-07-21T18:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2006-07-21T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T18:39:54.132Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2006-3778",
      "date": "2026-07-29",
      "epss": "0.01484",
      "percentile": "0.71345"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2006-3778\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2006-07-24T12:19:00.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-16T00:27:16.627\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) \\\"Save As Draft\\\" option is used or (2) a \\\",\\\" (comma) is inside the \\\"phrase\\\" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, y 7.0 no maneja adecuadamente las respuestas a mensajes de correo con nombres de usuario alternativo cuando la opci\u00f3n(1) \\\"Guardar como borrador\\\" es utilizada o (2) una \\\",\\\" (coma) est\u00e1 dentro de la porci\u00f3n de una direcci\u00f3n, la cual podr\u00eda hacer que el email sea env\u00edado a usuarios que fueron borrados desde los campos To, CC y BBC, lo cual permite a un atacante remotos obtener una lista de receptores originales.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_notes:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1E234AD1-7202-421E-82C8-880E84876021\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_notes:6.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1360A50E-C1E1-4690-874A-04CC7C1A77CC\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_notes:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"68AEB13D-C7C6-426F-8484-85EFF7245DF5\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/21096\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/21096\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]}]}}"
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.