Vulnerability-Lookup

CNVD-2026-15861

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2026-04-02

Title

ZTE ElasticNet UME R32 on Linux权限管理不当漏洞

Description

ZTE ElasticNet UME R32是中国中兴通讯（ZTE）公司的一个业务管理与流量处理平台。 ZTE ElasticNet UME R32 on Linux存在权限管理不当漏洞，攻击者可利用该漏洞导致访问未受ACL适当约束的功能。

Severity

高

Patch Name

ZTE ElasticNet UME R32 on Linux权限管理不当漏洞的补丁

Patch Description

ZTE ElasticNet UME R32是中国中兴通讯（ZTE）公司的一个业务管理与流量处理平台。 ZTE ElasticNet UME R32 on Linux存在权限管理不当漏洞，攻击者可利用该漏洞导致访问未受ACL适当约束的功能。目前，供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息，修复了此漏洞。

Formal description

厂商已发布了漏洞修复程序，请及时关注更新: https://support.zte.com.cn/zte-iccp-isupport-webui/bulletin/detail/2180460616364429350

Reference

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66314

Impacted products

Name
ZTE ElasticNet UME R32 ElasticNet_UME_R32_V16.23.20.04

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2025-66314",
      "cveUrl": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66314"
    }
  },
  "description": "ZTE ElasticNet UME R32\u662f\u4e2d\u56fd\u4e2d\u5174\u901a\u8baf\uff08ZTE\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u4e1a\u52a1\u7ba1\u7406\u4e0e\u6d41\u91cf\u5904\u7406\u5e73\u53f0\u3002\n\nZTE ElasticNet UME R32 on Linux\u5b58\u5728\u6743\u9650\u7ba1\u7406\u4e0d\u5f53\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u5bfc\u81f4\u8bbf\u95ee\u672a\u53d7ACL\u9002\u5f53\u7ea6\u675f\u7684\u529f\u80fd\u3002",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u7a0b\u5e8f\uff0c\u8bf7\u53ca\u65f6\u5173\u6ce8\u66f4\u65b0:\r\nhttps://support.zte.com.cn/zte-iccp-isupport-webui/bulletin/detail/2180460616364429350",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2026-15861",
  "openTime": "2026-04-02",
  "patchDescription": "ZTE ElasticNet UME R32\u662f\u4e2d\u56fd\u4e2d\u5174\u901a\u8baf\uff08ZTE\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u4e1a\u52a1\u7ba1\u7406\u4e0e\u6d41\u91cf\u5904\u7406\u5e73\u53f0\u3002\r\n\r\nZTE ElasticNet UME R32 on Linux\u5b58\u5728\u6743\u9650\u7ba1\u7406\u4e0d\u5f53\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u5bfc\u81f4\u8bbf\u95ee\u672a\u53d7ACL\u9002\u5f53\u7ea6\u675f\u7684\u529f\u80fd\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "ZTE ElasticNet UME R32 on Linux\u6743\u9650\u7ba1\u7406\u4e0d\u5f53\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "ZTE ElasticNet UME R32 ElasticNet_UME_R32_V16.23.20.04"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66314",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2025-11-28",
  "title": "ZTE ElasticNet UME R32 on Linux\u6743\u9650\u7ba1\u7406\u4e0d\u5f53\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}

CVE-2025-66314 (GCVE-0-2025-66314)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-27 02:08 – Updated: 2025-11-28 15:13

Summary

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in ZTE ElasticNet UME R32 on Linux allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects ElasticNet UME R32: ElasticNet_UME_R32_V16.23.20.04.

Severity

7.5 (High)


                        
                          CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

SSVC

Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial

CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)

Decision recorded 2025-11-28 15:13 UTC

CWE

CWE-269 - Improper Privilege Management

Assigner

zte CNA under the mitre root

CNA scorecard C 69/100 over 30 records in the last 180 days details

References

1 reference

URL	Tags
https://support.zte.com.cn/zte-iccp-isupport-webu…

Impacted products

1 product

Vendor	Product	Version
ZTE	ElasticNet UME R32	Affected: ElasticNet_UME_R32_V16.23.20.04 (custom)

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-66314",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-11-28T15:13:39.538398Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-11-28T15:13:46.910Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "platforms": [
            "Linux"
          ],
          "product": "ElasticNet UME R32",
          "vendor": "ZTE",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "ElasticNet_UME_R32_V16.23.20.04",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in ZTE ElasticNet UME R32 on Linux allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ElasticNet UME R32: ElasticNet_UME_R32_V16.23.20.04.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in ZTE ElasticNet UME R32 on Linux allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects ElasticNet UME R32: ElasticNet_UME_R32_V16.23.20.04."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-269",
              "description": "CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-11-27T02:08:31.651Z",
        "orgId": "6786b568-6808-4982-b61f-398b0d9679eb",
        "shortName": "zte"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://support.zte.com.cn/zte-iccp-isupport-webui/bulletin/detail/2180460616364429350"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(215, 242, 255);\"\u003eElasticNet_UME_R32_V16.25.40.10\u003c/span\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "ElasticNet_UME_R32_V16.25.40.10"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "6786b568-6808-4982-b61f-398b0d9679eb",
    "assignerShortName": "zte",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-66314",
    "datePublished": "2025-11-27T02:08:31.651Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-11-27T01:35:07.252Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-11-28T15:13:46.910Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

Order JSON

How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Publication & reservation Sightings KEV catalogs Other timestamps

Loading timeline…

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted