CNVD-2020-29736

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2020-05-25
VLAI
Title
多款ESET产品ESET AV parsing engine输入验证错误漏洞
Description
ESET Smart Security Premium等都是斯洛伐克ESET公司的产品。Smart Security Premium是一套杀毒软件。Internet Security是一套针对互联网安全的杀毒软件。NOD32 Antivirus是一套杀毒软件。ESET AV parsing engine是其中的一个解析引擎。 多款ESET产品中的ESET AV parsing engine存在安全漏洞。攻击者可借助归档文件中的BZ2 Checksum字段利用该漏洞绕过病毒检查。
Severity
高
Patch Name
多款ESET产品ESET AV parsing engine输入验证错误漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
ESET Smart Security Premium等都是斯洛伐克ESET公司的产品。Smart Security Premium是一套杀毒软件。Internet Security是一套针对互联网安全的杀毒软件。NOD32 Antivirus是一套杀毒软件。ESET AV parsing engine是其中的一个解析引擎。 多款ESET产品中的ESET AV parsing engine存在安全漏洞。攻击者可借助归档文件中的BZ2 Checksum字段利用该漏洞绕过病毒检查。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

目前厂商已发布升级补丁以修复漏洞,补丁获取链接: https://support.eset.com/en/ca7387-modules-review-december-2019

Reference
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-10180
Impacted products
Name
['Eset Smart Security Premium <1294', 'Eset Internet Security <1294', 'Eset NOD32 Antivirus <1294', 'Eset Mobile Security for Android <1294', 'Eset Smart TV Security <1294', 'Eset NOD32 Antivirus 4 for Linux Desktop <1294', 'Eset Cyber Security Pro (MAC) <1294', 'Eset Cyber Security (MAC) <1294']
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2020-10180"
    }
  },
  "description": "ESET Smart Security Premium\u7b49\u90fd\u662f\u65af\u6d1b\u4f10\u514bESET\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4ea7\u54c1\u3002Smart Security Premium\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u6740\u6bd2\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002Internet Security\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u9488\u5bf9\u4e92\u8054\u7f51\u5b89\u5168\u7684\u6740\u6bd2\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002NOD32 Antivirus\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u6740\u6bd2\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002ESET AV parsing engine\u662f\u5176\u4e2d\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u89e3\u6790\u5f15\u64ce\u3002\n\n\u591a\u6b3eESET\u4ea7\u54c1\u4e2d\u7684ESET AV parsing engine\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u501f\u52a9\u5f52\u6863\u6587\u4ef6\u4e2d\u7684BZ2 Checksum\u5b57\u6bb5\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7ed5\u8fc7\u75c5\u6bd2\u68c0\u67e5\u3002",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u53d1\u5e03\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8865\u4e01\u83b7\u53d6\u94fe\u63a5\uff1a\r\nhttps://support.eset.com/en/ca7387-modules-review-december-2019",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2020-29736",
  "openTime": "2020-05-25",
  "patchDescription": "ESET Smart Security Premium\u7b49\u90fd\u662f\u65af\u6d1b\u4f10\u514bESET\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4ea7\u54c1\u3002Smart Security Premium\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u6740\u6bd2\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002Internet Security\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u9488\u5bf9\u4e92\u8054\u7f51\u5b89\u5168\u7684\u6740\u6bd2\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002NOD32 Antivirus\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u6740\u6bd2\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002ESET AV parsing engine\u662f\u5176\u4e2d\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u89e3\u6790\u5f15\u64ce\u3002\r\n\r\n\u591a\u6b3eESET\u4ea7\u54c1\u4e2d\u7684ESET AV parsing engine\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u501f\u52a9\u5f52\u6863\u6587\u4ef6\u4e2d\u7684BZ2 Checksum\u5b57\u6bb5\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7ed5\u8fc7\u75c5\u6bd2\u68c0\u67e5\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "\u591a\u6b3eESET\u4ea7\u54c1ESET AV parsing engine\u8f93\u5165\u9a8c\u8bc1\u9519\u8bef\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "Eset Smart Security Premium \u003c1294",
      "Eset Internet Security \u003c1294",
      "Eset NOD32 Antivirus \u003c1294",
      "Eset Mobile Security for Android \u003c1294",
      "Eset Smart TV Security \u003c1294",
      "Eset NOD32 Antivirus 4 for Linux Desktop \u003c1294",
      "Eset Cyber Security Pro (MAC) \u003c1294",
      "Eset Cyber Security (MAC) \u003c1294"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-10180",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2020-03-09",
  "title": "\u591a\u6b3eESET\u4ea7\u54c1ESET AV parsing engine\u8f93\u5165\u9a8c\u8bc1\u9519\u8bef\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.