CNVD-2019-01671
Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2019-01-16
VLAI
Title
Live555 Media Server拒绝服务漏洞
Description
LIVE555 Media Server是一款RTSP服务器程序,可提供各种媒体文件流服务。
Live555 Media Server0.93版本中的LIVE555 Streaming Media库存在拒绝服务漏洞,攻击者可通过发送带有-sessioncookie HTTP报头的GET请求并在同一个TCP会话中发送POST请求利用该漏洞造成RTSPServer崩溃。
Severity
中
Formal description
厂商尚未提供漏洞修复方案,请关注厂商主页更新: https://github.com/rgaufman/live555
Reference
https://github.com/rgaufman/live555/issues/19
Impacted products
| Name | LIVE555 Media Server 0.93 |
|---|
{
"cves": {
"cve": {
"cveNumber": "CVE-2019-6256"
}
},
"description": "LIVE555 Media Server\u662f\u4e00\u6b3eRTSP\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u7a0b\u5e8f\uff0c\u53ef\u63d0\u4f9b\u5404\u79cd\u5a92\u4f53\u6587\u4ef6\u6d41\u670d\u52a1\u3002\n\nLive555 Media Server0.93\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u7684LIVE555 Streaming Media\u5e93\u5b58\u5728\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u901a\u8fc7\u53d1\u9001\u5e26\u6709-sessioncookie HTTP\u62a5\u5934\u7684GET\u8bf7\u6c42\u5e76\u5728\u540c\u4e00\u4e2aTCP\u4f1a\u8bdd\u4e2d\u53d1\u9001POST\u8bf7\u6c42\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210RTSPServer\u5d29\u6e83\u3002",
"discovererName": "DshtAnger",
"formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttps://github.com/rgaufman/live555",
"isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
"number": "CNVD-2019-01671",
"openTime": "2019-01-16",
"products": {
"product": "LIVE555 Media Server 0.93"
},
"referenceLink": "https://github.com/rgaufman/live555/issues/19",
"serverity": "\u4e2d",
"submitTime": "2019-01-16",
"title": "Live555 Media Server\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.