CNVD-2018-10322
Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2018-05-25
VLAI
Title
libjpeg拒绝服务漏洞(CNVD-2018-10322)
Description
libjpeg是独立JPEG工作组(Independent JPEG Group,IJG)所维护的一个包含JPEG解码、JPEG编码和其他JPEG功能的C语言库。
libjpeg 9a版本中的rdppm.c文件的‘get_text_gray_row’函数存在安全漏洞。远程攻击者可借助特制的文件利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务(段错误)。
Severity
中
Formal description
厂商尚未提供漏洞修复方案,请关注厂商主页更新: http://libjpeg.sourceforge.net/
Reference
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-11213
Impacted products
| Name | libjpeg libjpeg 9a |
|---|
{
"cves": {
"cve": {
"cveNumber": "CVE-2018-11213"
}
},
"description": "libjpeg\u662f\u72ec\u7acbJPEG\u5de5\u4f5c\u7ec4\uff08Independent JPEG Group\uff0cIJG\uff09\u6240\u7ef4\u62a4\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u5305\u542bJPEG\u89e3\u7801\u3001JPEG\u7f16\u7801\u548c\u5176\u4ed6JPEG\u529f\u80fd\u7684C\u8bed\u8a00\u5e93\u3002\r\n\r\nlibjpeg 9a\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u7684rdppm.c\u6587\u4ef6\u7684\u2018get_text_gray_row\u2019\u51fd\u6570\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u501f\u52a9\u7279\u5236\u7684\u6587\u4ef6\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u6bb5\u9519\u8bef\uff09\u3002",
"discovererName": "unknwon",
"formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttp://libjpeg.sourceforge.net/",
"isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
"number": "CNVD-2018-10322",
"openTime": "2018-05-25",
"products": {
"product": "libjpeg libjpeg 9a"
},
"referenceLink": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-11213",
"serverity": "\u4e2d",
"submitTime": "2018-05-17",
"title": "libjpeg\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff08CNVD-2018-10322\uff09"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.