Vulnerability-Lookup

CNVD-2018-09158

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2018-05-09

Title

2345 Security Guard安全绕过漏洞（CNVD-2018-09158）

Description

2345 Security Guard是中国2345公司的一套计算机安全防护软件。 2345 Security Guard 3.7.0版本中的2345MPCSafe.exe文件存在安全漏洞。本地攻击者可利用该漏洞绕过访问限制，从而终止进程。

Severity

低

Formal description

目前没有详细的解决方案提供： http://safe.2345.cc/

Reference

https://github.com/rebol0x6c/2345_wm_syscommand

Impacted products

Name
2345安全卫士 2345 Security Guard 3.7.0

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2018-10739"
    }
  },
  "description": "2345 Security Guard\u662f\u4e2d\u56fd2345\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u8ba1\u7b97\u673a\u5b89\u5168\u9632\u62a4\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002\r\n\r\n2345 Security Guard 3.7.0\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u76842345MPCSafe.exe\u6587\u4ef6\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u672c\u5730\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7ed5\u8fc7\u8bbf\u95ee\u9650\u5236\uff0c\u4ece\u800c\u7ec8\u6b62\u8fdb\u7a0b\u3002",
  "discovererName": "unknown",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u7684\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttp://safe.2345.cc/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2018-09158",
  "openTime": "2018-05-09",
  "products": {
    "product": "2345\u5b89\u5168\u536b\u58eb 2345 Security Guard 3.7.0"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://github.com/rebol0x6c/2345_wm_syscommand",
  "serverity": "\u4f4e",
  "submitTime": "2018-05-08",
  "title": "2345 Security Guard\u5b89\u5168\u7ed5\u8fc7\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff08CNVD-2018-09158\uff09"
}

CVE-2018-10739 (GCVE-0-2018-10739)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2018-05-04 17:00 – Updated: 2024-09-16 20:41

Summary

An issue was discovered in Shanghai 2345 Security Guard 3.7.0. 2345MPCSafe.exe allows local users to bypass intended process protections, and consequently terminate process, because WM_SYSCOMMAND is not properly considered.

Severity

No CVSS data available.

CWE

Assigner

mitre CNA under the mitre root

CNA scorecard E 29/100 over 2175 records in the last 180 days details

References

1 reference

URL	Tags
https://github.com/rebol0x6c/2345_wm_syscommand	x_refsource_MISC

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T07:46:46.542Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/rebol0x6c/2345_wm_syscommand"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "An issue was discovered in Shanghai 2345 Security Guard 3.7.0. 2345MPCSafe.exe allows local users to bypass intended process protections, and consequently terminate process, because WM_SYSCOMMAND is not properly considered."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2018-05-04T17:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/rebol0x6c/2345_wm_syscommand"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2018-10739",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "An issue was discovered in Shanghai 2345 Security Guard 3.7.0. 2345MPCSafe.exe allows local users to bypass intended process protections, and consequently terminate process, because WM_SYSCOMMAND is not properly considered."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/rebol0x6c/2345_wm_syscommand",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://github.com/rebol0x6c/2345_wm_syscommand"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2018-10739",
    "datePublished": "2018-05-04T17:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2018-05-04T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T20:41:33.865Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

Order JSON

How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Publication & reservation Sightings KEV catalogs Other timestamps

Loading timeline…

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted