CNVD-2018-08791

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2018-05-03
VLAI
Title
TPshop web后门漏洞
Description
TPsho作为一款电商系统,被多个商家作为电商系统解决方案。 在提供PC端应用的同时,还提供了Android和iOS平台的APP。 TPshop web存在后门漏洞。攻击者利用该漏洞下载任意文件,扫描网络端口,攻击内部网络甚至远程命令执行。
Severity
高
Formal description

目前没有详细解决方案提供: http://www.tp-shop.cn/

Reference
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/May/11
Impacted products
Name
深圳搜豹网络有限公司 Tpshop >=2.0.5,<=2.0.8
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2018-9919"
    }
  },
  "description": "TPsho\u4f5c\u4e3a\u4e00\u6b3e\u7535\u5546\u7cfb\u7edf\uff0c\u88ab\u591a\u4e2a\u5546\u5bb6\u4f5c\u4e3a\u7535\u5546\u7cfb\u7edf\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u3002 \u5728\u63d0\u4f9bPC\u7aef\u5e94\u7528\u7684\u540c\u65f6\uff0c\u8fd8\u63d0\u4f9b\u4e86Android\u548ciOS\u5e73\u53f0\u7684APP\u3002\r\n\r\nTPshop web\u5b58\u5728\u540e\u95e8\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4e0b\u8f7d\u4efb\u610f\u6587\u4ef6\uff0c\u626b\u63cf\u7f51\u7edc\u7aef\u53e3\uff0c\u653b\u51fb\u5185\u90e8\u7f51\u7edc\u751a\u81f3\u8fdc\u7a0b\u547d\u4ee4\u6267\u884c\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Qian Wu \u0026 Bo Wang \u0026 Jiawang Zhang \u0026  National Computer Network Emergency Response  Technical Team/Coordination Center of China (CNCERT/CC)",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.tp-shop.cn/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2018-08791",
  "openTime": "2018-05-03",
  "products": {
    "product": "\u6df1\u5733\u641c\u8c79\u7f51\u7edc\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8 Tpshop \u003e=2.0.5\uff0c\u003c=2.0.8"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/May/11",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2018-05-03",
  "title": "TPshop web\u540e\u95e8\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.