CNVD-2018-04660

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2018-03-08
VLAI
Title
Enalean Tuleap存在未明漏洞
Description
Enalean Tuleap是法国Enalean公司的一套开源的软件开发和项目管理工具。该工具提供企业应用程序生命周期管理,以及项目跟踪、源代码管理和团队协作等功能。 Enalean Tuleap中存在安全漏洞。攻击者可利用该漏洞使用户更改其注册邮件的地址,从而控制账户。
Severity
中
Formal description

厂商尚未提供漏洞修复方案,请关注厂商主页更新: https://tuleap.net/

Reference
https://tuleap.net/plugins/git/tuleap/tuleap/stable?p=tuleap%2Fstable.git&a=commit&h=d6701289ae55de900929ff0f66313fa9771a198d
Impacted products
Name
Enalean Tuleap 9.17
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2018-7634"
    }
  },
  "description": "Enalean Tuleap\u662f\u6cd5\u56fdEnalean\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u8f6f\u4ef6\u5f00\u53d1\u548c\u9879\u76ee\u7ba1\u7406\u5de5\u5177\u3002\u8be5\u5de5\u5177\u63d0\u4f9b\u4f01\u4e1a\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u751f\u547d\u5468\u671f\u7ba1\u7406\uff0c\u4ee5\u53ca\u9879\u76ee\u8ddf\u8e2a\u3001\u6e90\u4ee3\u7801\u7ba1\u7406\u548c\u56e2\u961f\u534f\u4f5c\u7b49\u529f\u80fd\u3002\r\n\r\nEnalean Tuleap\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4f7f\u7528\u6237\u66f4\u6539\u5176\u6ce8\u518c\u90ae\u4ef6\u7684\u5730\u5740\uff0c\u4ece\u800c\u63a7\u5236\u8d26\u6237\u3002",
  "discovererName": "@mustafaran",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttps://tuleap.net/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2018-04660",
  "openTime": "2018-03-08",
  "products": {
    "product": "Enalean Tuleap 9.17"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://tuleap.net/plugins/git/tuleap/tuleap/stable?p=tuleap%2Fstable.git\u0026a=commit\u0026h=d6701289ae55de900929ff0f66313fa9771a198d",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2018-03-05",
  "title": "Enalean Tuleap\u5b58\u5728\u672a\u660e\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.