CNVD-2018-02850
Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2018-02-06
VLAI
Title
nProtect AVS拒绝服务漏洞
Description
nProtect AVS是用于阻止恶意软件、间谍软件、勒索软件等网络威胁的安全软件。
nProtect AVS V4.0 4.0.0.38中的驱动程序文件TKRgFtXp.SYS存在拒绝服务漏洞。该漏洞产生的原因是未验证来自IOCtl 0x220408的输入值。本地用户可利用该漏洞导致拒绝服务(蓝屏死机)。
Severity
中
Formal description
目前没有详细的解决方案提供: http://avs4.nprotect.com/en/index.html
Reference
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-6522
Impacted products
| Name | INCA nProtect AVS V4.0 4.0.0.38 |
|---|
{
"cves": {
"cve": {
"cveNumber": "CVE-2018-6522"
}
},
"description": "nProtect AVS\u662f\u7528\u4e8e\u963b\u6b62\u6076\u610f\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3001\u95f4\u8c0d\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3001\u52d2\u7d22\u8f6f\u4ef6\u7b49\u7f51\u7edc\u5a01\u80c1\u7684\u5b89\u5168\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002\r\n\r\nnProtect AVS V4.0 4.0.0.38\u4e2d\u7684\u9a71\u52a8\u7a0b\u5e8f\u6587\u4ef6TKRgFtXp.SYS\u5b58\u5728\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4ea7\u751f\u7684\u539f\u56e0\u662f\u672a\u9a8c\u8bc1\u6765\u81eaIOCtl 0x220408\u7684\u8f93\u5165\u503c\u3002\u672c\u5730\u7528\u6237\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u5bfc\u81f4\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u84dd\u5c4f\u6b7b\u673a\uff09\u3002",
"discovererName": "unknown",
"formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u7684\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttp://avs4.nprotect.com/en/index.html",
"isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
"number": "CNVD-2018-02850",
"openTime": "2018-02-06",
"products": {
"product": "INCA nProtect AVS V4.0 4.0.0.38"
},
"referenceLink": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-6522",
"serverity": "\u4e2d",
"submitTime": "2018-02-02",
"title": "nProtect AVS\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.