Vulnerability-Lookup

CNVD-2017-38305

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2017-12-28

Title

多款设备Samsung 850 Pro、PM851固态硬盘、Seagate ST500LT015和ST500LT025硬盘热插拔攻击漏洞

Description

Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptop是中国联想（Lenovo）公司的一款笔记本电脑。Dell Latitude E6410 laptop是美国戴尔（Dell）公司的一款笔记本电脑。Samsung 850 Pro等都是使用在笔记本电脑中的硬盘。Samsung 850 Pro是韩国三星（Samsung）公司生产的硬盘。Seagate ST500LT015是美国希捷（Seagate）公司生产的硬盘。多款设备上的Samsung 850 Pro、PM851固态硬盘、Seagate ST500LT015和ST500LT025硬盘中存在安全漏洞。攻击者可利用该漏洞绕过自我加密硬盘（SED）保护。

Severity

低

Formal description

厂商尚未提供漏洞修复方案，请关注厂商主页及时更新： http://www.samsung.com/cn/

Reference

https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf

Impacted products

Name
['Samsung 850 Pro', 'Samsung PM851', 'Seagate Technology ST500LT015', 'Seagate Technology ST500LT025']

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-7267"
    }
  },
  "description": "Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptop\u662f\u4e2d\u56fd\u8054\u60f3\uff08Lenovo\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u7b14\u8bb0\u672c\u7535\u8111\u3002Dell Latitude E6410 laptop\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u6234\u5c14\uff08Dell\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u7b14\u8bb0\u672c\u7535\u8111\u3002Samsung 850 Pro\u7b49\u90fd\u662f\u4f7f\u7528\u5728\u7b14\u8bb0\u672c\u7535\u8111\u4e2d\u7684\u786c\u76d8\u3002Samsung 850 Pro\u662f\u97e9\u56fd\u4e09\u661f\uff08Samsung\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u751f\u4ea7\u7684\u786c\u76d8\u3002Seagate ST500LT015\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u5e0c\u6377\uff08Seagate\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u751f\u4ea7\u7684\u786c\u76d8\u3002\r\n\r\n\u591a\u6b3e\u8bbe\u5907\u4e0a\u7684Samsung 850 Pro\u3001PM851\u56fa\u6001\u786c\u76d8\u3001Seagate ST500LT015\u548cST500LT025\u786c\u76d8\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7ed5\u8fc7\u81ea\u6211\u52a0\u5bc6\u786c\u76d8\uff08SED\uff09\u4fdd\u62a4\u3002",
  "discovererName": "unknwon",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u53ca\u65f6\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.samsung.com/cn/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2017-38305",
  "openTime": "2017-12-28",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "Samsung 850 Pro",
      "Samsung PM851",
      "Seagate Technology ST500LT015",
      "Seagate Technology ST500LT025"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf",
  "serverity": "\u4f4e",
  "submitTime": "2017-11-29",
  "title": "\u591a\u6b3e\u8bbe\u5907Samsung 850 Pro\u3001PM851\u56fa\u6001\u786c\u76d8\u3001Seagate ST500LT015\u548cST500LT025\u786c\u76d8\u70ed\u63d2\u62d4\u653b\u51fb\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}

CVE-2015-7267 (GCVE-0-2015-7267)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-11-27 22:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 07:43

Summary

Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when in sleep mode and operating in Opal or eDrive mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32; ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21; Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16; or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by leveraging failure to detect when SATA drives are unplugged in Sleep Mode, aka a "Hot Plug attack."

Severity

No CVSS data available.

CWE

Assigner

certcc mitre root

References

2 references

URL	Tags
https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encrypt…	x_refsource_MISC
https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-…	x_refsource_MISC

Date Public

2015-11-02 00:00

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T07:43:46.159Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2015-11-02T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when in sleep mode and operating in Opal or eDrive mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32; ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21; Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16; or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by leveraging failure to detect when SATA drives are unplugged in Sleep Mode, aka a \"Hot Plug attack.\""
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-11-27T21:57:01.000Z",
        "orgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
        "shortName": "certcc"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2015-7267",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when in sleep mode and operating in Opal or eDrive mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32; ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21; Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16; or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by leveraging failure to detect when SATA drives are unplugged in Sleep Mode, aka a \"Hot Plug attack.\""
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
    "assignerShortName": "certcc",
    "cveId": "CVE-2015-7267",
    "datePublished": "2017-11-27T22:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2015-09-18T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T07:43:46.159Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted

CNVD-2017-38305

CVE-2015-7267 (GCVE-0-2015-7267)

Tags

Sightings

Nomenclature

Related by attack behaviour