CNVD-2017-36481
Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2017-12-05
VLAI
Title
Django-make-app任意命令执行漏洞
Description
django_make_app是一款用于生成Django应用程序代码的工具。
django_make_app 0.1.3版本中的io_utils.py文件的read_yaml_file方法的YAML解析功能存在安全漏洞。攻击者可通过向已加载的YAML中注入Python利用该漏洞执行任意的Python命令。
Severity
高
Formal description
厂商尚未提供漏洞修复方案,请关注厂商主页更新: https://github.com/illagrenan/django-make-app
Reference
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-16764
Impacted products
| Name | Django_make_app django_make_app 0.1.3 |
|---|
{
"cves": {
"cve": {
"cveNumber": "CVE-2017-16764"
}
},
"description": "django_make_app\u662f\u4e00\u6b3e\u7528\u4e8e\u751f\u6210Django\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u4ee3\u7801\u7684\u5de5\u5177\u3002\r\n\r\ndjango_make_app 0.1.3\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u7684io_utils.py\u6587\u4ef6\u7684read_yaml_file\u65b9\u6cd5\u7684YAML\u89e3\u6790\u529f\u80fd\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u901a\u8fc7\u5411\u5df2\u52a0\u8f7d\u7684YAML\u4e2d\u6ce8\u5165Python\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u7684Python\u547d\u4ee4\u3002",
"discovererName": "Joel",
"formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttps://github.com/illagrenan/django-make-app",
"isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
"number": "CNVD-2017-36481",
"openTime": "2017-12-05",
"products": {
"product": "Django_make_app django_make_app 0.1.3"
},
"referenceLink": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-16764",
"serverity": "\u9ad8",
"submitTime": "2017-11-13",
"title": "Django-make-app\u4efb\u610f\u547d\u4ee4\u6267\u884c\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.