CNVD-2017-35801

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2017-12-01
VLAI
Title
IDEMIA MorphoSmart 1300 Series设备certificate import模块权限获取漏洞
Description
IDEMIA(前称Morpho)MorphoSmart 1300 Series(又名MSO 1300 Series)devices是法国IDEMIA(前称Morpho)公司的一款指纹识别设备。certificate import component是其中的一个证书导入组件。 IDEMIA MSO 1300 Series设备中的certificate import模块存在安全漏洞。本地攻击者可利用该漏洞获取命令shell,从而获取权限。
Severity
高
Formal description

厂商尚未提供漏洞修复方案,请关注厂商主页更新: https://www.idemia.com/

Reference
https://gist.github.com/shiham101/4c49ece8ecac7c3c02ecbc6942aeca80
Impacted products
Name
IDEMIA MorphoSmart 1300 Series
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2017-15567"
    }
  },
  "description": "IDEMIA\uff08\u524d\u79f0Morpho\uff09MorphoSmart 1300 Series\uff08\u53c8\u540dMSO 1300 Series\uff09devices\u662f\u6cd5\u56fdIDEMIA\uff08\u524d\u79f0Morpho\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u6307\u7eb9\u8bc6\u522b\u8bbe\u5907\u3002certificate import component\u662f\u5176\u4e2d\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u8bc1\u4e66\u5bfc\u5165\u7ec4\u4ef6\u3002\r\n\r\nIDEMIA MSO 1300 Series\u8bbe\u5907\u4e2d\u7684certificate import\u6a21\u5757\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u672c\u5730\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u83b7\u53d6\u547d\u4ee4shell\uff0c\u4ece\u800c\u83b7\u53d6\u6743\u9650\u3002",
  "discovererName": "unknown",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttps://www.idemia.com/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2017-35801",
  "openTime": "2017-12-01",
  "products": {
    "product": "IDEMIA MorphoSmart 1300 Series"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://gist.github.com/shiham101/4c49ece8ecac7c3c02ecbc6942aeca80",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2017-11-01",
  "title": "IDEMIA MorphoSmart 1300 Series\u8bbe\u5907certificate import\u6a21\u5757\u6743\u9650\u83b7\u53d6\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.