CNVD-2017-32920

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2017-11-07
VLAI
Title
Cisco Aironet Access Points拒绝服务漏洞(CNVD-2017-32920)
Description
Cisco Aironet 1560、2800和3800 Series Access Points都是美国思科(Cisco)公司的路由器接入设备。 Cisco Aironet 1560、2800和3800 Series Access Points中的Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) ingress fram处理存在拒绝服务漏洞,该漏洞源于程序未能充分的验证EAP帧。攻击者可通过向受影响的目标设备发送畸形的EAP帧利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务(重新加载)。
Severity
高
Patch Name
Cisco Aironet Access Points拒绝服务漏洞(CNVD-2017-32920)的补丁
Patch Description
Cisco Aironet 1560、2800和3800 Series Access Points都是美国思科(Cisco)公司的路由器接入设备。 Cisco Aironet 1560、2800和3800 Series Access Points中的Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) ingress fram处理存在拒绝服务漏洞,该漏洞源于程序未能充分的验证EAP帧。攻击者可通过向受影响的目标设备发送畸形的EAP帧利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务(重新加载)。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

目前厂商已发布升级补丁以修复漏洞,补丁获取链接: https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20171101-aironet2

Reference
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20171101-aironet2
Impacted products
Name
['Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points', 'Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points', 'Cisco Aironet 1560 Series Access Points 8.3.112.0']
Show details on source website

{
  "bids": {
    "bid": {
      "bidNumber": "101648"
    }
  },
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2017-12274"
    }
  },
  "description": "Cisco Aironet 1560\u30012800\u548c3800 Series Access Points\u90fd\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u601d\u79d1\uff08Cisco\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u8def\u7531\u5668\u63a5\u5165\u8bbe\u5907\u3002\r\n\r\nCisco Aironet 1560\u30012800\u548c3800 Series Access Points\u4e2d\u7684Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) ingress fram\u5904\u7406\u5b58\u5728\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u672a\u80fd\u5145\u5206\u7684\u9a8c\u8bc1EAP\u5e27\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u901a\u8fc7\u5411\u53d7\u5f71\u54cd\u7684\u76ee\u6807\u8bbe\u5907\u53d1\u9001\u7578\u5f62\u7684EAP\u5e27\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u91cd\u65b0\u52a0\u8f7d\uff09\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Cisco",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u53d1\u5e03\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8865\u4e01\u83b7\u53d6\u94fe\u63a5\uff1a\r\nhttps://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20171101-aironet2",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2017-32920",
  "openTime": "2017-11-07",
  "patchDescription": "Cisco Aironet 1560\u30012800\u548c3800 Series Access Points\u90fd\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u601d\u79d1\uff08Cisco\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u8def\u7531\u5668\u63a5\u5165\u8bbe\u5907\u3002\r\n\r\nCisco Aironet 1560\u30012800\u548c3800 Series Access Points\u4e2d\u7684Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) ingress fram\u5904\u7406\u5b58\u5728\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u672a\u80fd\u5145\u5206\u7684\u9a8c\u8bc1EAP\u5e27\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u901a\u8fc7\u5411\u53d7\u5f71\u54cd\u7684\u76ee\u6807\u8bbe\u5907\u53d1\u9001\u7578\u5f62\u7684EAP\u5e27\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u91cd\u65b0\u52a0\u8f7d\uff09\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Cisco Aironet Access Points\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff08CNVD-2017-32920\uff09\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points",
      "Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points",
      "Cisco Aironet 1560 Series Access Points 8.3.112.0"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20171101-aironet2",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2017-11-02",
  "title": "Cisco Aironet Access Points\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff08CNVD-2017-32920\uff09"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.