CNVD-2017-03692

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2017-03-30
VLAI
Title
Tiki Wiki CMS任意文件泄露漏洞
Description
Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware是Tiki软件社区的一套开源的内容管理和门户应用程序,它可用于创建Web应用程序、门户网站、企业内部网、外联网等。 Tiki Wiki CMS 15.2版本存在任意文件泄露漏洞。攻击者利用此漏洞在受影响从应用程序上下文的本地系统中查看任意文件。
Severity
中
Formal description

目前没有详细解决方案提供: htp://www.tiki.org

Reference
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96787 https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10143
Impacted products
Name
Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware 15.2
Show details on source website

{
  "bids": {
    "bid": {
      "bidNumber": "96787"
    }
  },
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2016-10143"
    }
  },
  "description": "Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware\u662fTiki\u8f6f\u4ef6\u793e\u533a\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u5185\u5bb9\u7ba1\u7406\u548c\u95e8\u6237\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\uff0c\u5b83\u53ef\u7528\u4e8e\u521b\u5efaWeb\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u3001\u95e8\u6237\u7f51\u7ad9\u3001\u4f01\u4e1a\u5185\u90e8\u7f51\u3001\u5916\u8054\u7f51\u7b49\u3002\r\n\r\nTiki Wiki CMS 15.2\u7248\u672c\u5b58\u5728\u4efb\u610f\u6587\u4ef6\u6cc4\u9732\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u5728\u53d7\u5f71\u54cd\u4ece\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u4e0a\u4e0b\u6587\u7684\u672c\u5730\u7cfb\u7edf\u4e2d\u67e5\u770b\u4efb\u610f\u6587\u4ef6\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Zhao Liang, Huawei Weiran Labs.",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhtp://www.tiki.org",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2017-03692",
  "openTime": "2017-03-30",
  "products": {
    "product": "Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware 15.2"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96787\r\nhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10143",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2017-03-13",
  "title": "Tiki Wiki CMS\u4efb\u610f\u6587\u4ef6\u6cc4\u9732\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.