CNVD-2016-10932

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-11-11
VLAI
Title
多款NVIDIA产品GPU Display Driver本地权限提升漏洞
Description
NVIDIA Quadro、NVS和GeForce都是美国英伟达(NVIDIA)公司的显卡产品。NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver是其中的一个专用于Windows的图形处理器(GPU)显卡驱动程序。 NVIDIA Quadro、NVS和GeForce产品中的NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver存在安全漏洞。攻击者可利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务(空指针逆向引用)。
Severity
中
Patch Name
多款NVIDIA产品GPU Display Driver在本地权限提升漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
NVIDIA Quadro、NVS和GeForce都是美国英伟达(NVIDIA)公司的显卡产品。NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver是其中的一个专用于Windows的图形处理器(GPU)显卡驱动程序。 NVIDIA Quadro、NVS和GeForce产品中的NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver存在安全漏洞。攻击者可利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务(空指针逆向引用)。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复此安全问题,补丁获取链接: http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/4247

Reference
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94172 http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/4247
Impacted products
Name
['NVIDIA Quadro', 'NVIDIA NVS', 'NVIDIA GeForce']
Show details on source website

{
  "bids": {
    "bid": {
      "bidNumber": "94172"
    }
  },
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2016-7388"
    }
  },
  "description": "NVIDIA Quadro\u3001NVS\u548cGeForce\u90fd\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u82f1\u4f1f\u8fbe\uff08NVIDIA\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u663e\u5361\u4ea7\u54c1\u3002NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver\u662f\u5176\u4e2d\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u4e13\u7528\u4e8eWindows\u7684\u56fe\u5f62\u5904\u7406\u5668(GPU)\u663e\u5361\u9a71\u52a8\u7a0b\u5e8f\u3002\r\n\r\nNVIDIA Quadro\u3001NVS\u548cGeForce\u4ea7\u54c1\u4e2d\u7684NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u7a7a\u6307\u9488\u9006\u5411\u5f15\u7528\uff09\u3002",
  "discovererName": "NVIDIA",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u7ecf\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u6b64\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8865\u4e01\u83b7\u53d6\u94fe\u63a5\uff1a\r\nhttp://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/4247",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-10932",
  "openTime": "2016-11-11",
  "patchDescription": "NVIDIA Quadro\u3001NVS\u548cGeForce\u90fd\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u82f1\u4f1f\u8fbe\uff08NVIDIA\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u663e\u5361\u4ea7\u54c1\u3002NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver\u662f\u5176\u4e2d\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u4e13\u7528\u4e8eWindows\u7684\u56fe\u5f62\u5904\u7406\u5668(GPU)\u663e\u5361\u9a71\u52a8\u7a0b\u5e8f\u3002\r\n\r\nNVIDIA Quadro\u3001NVS\u548cGeForce\u4ea7\u54c1\u4e2d\u7684NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u7a7a\u6307\u9488\u9006\u5411\u5f15\u7528\uff09\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "\u591a\u6b3eNVIDIA\u4ea7\u54c1GPU Display Driver\u5728\u672c\u5730\u6743\u9650\u63d0\u5347\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "NVIDIA Quadro",
      "NVIDIA NVS",
      "NVIDIA GeForce"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94172\r\nhttp://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/4247",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2016-11-10",
  "title": "\u591a\u6b3eNVIDIA\u4ea7\u54c1GPU Display Driver\u672c\u5730\u6743\u9650\u63d0\u5347\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.