CNVD-2016-08529

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-10-10
VLAI
Title
Red Hat Ceph RGW信息泄露漏洞
Description
Red Hat Ceph是美国红帽(Red Hat)公司的一套Linux PB级分布式文件系统。该系统的主要目标是设计成基于POSIX(可移植操作系统接口)的没有单点故障的分布式文件系统,使数据能容错和无缝的复制。 Red Hat Ceph 10.0.1之前的版本中的RGW代码存在信息泄露漏洞。远程攻击者可借助URL利用该漏洞列出bucket内容。
Severity
Patch Name
Red Hat Ceph RGW信息泄露漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
Red Hat Ceph是美国红帽(Red Hat)公司的一套Linux PB级分布式文件系统。该系统的主要目标是设计成基于POSIX(可移植操作系统接口)的没有单点故障的分布式文件系统,使数据能容错和无缝的复制。 Red Hat Ceph 10.0.1之前的版本中的RGW代码存在信息泄露漏洞。远程攻击者可借助URL利用该漏洞列出bucket内容。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复此安全问题,补丁获取链接: http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/release-notes/#v10-0-1

Reference
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1972.html
Impacted products
Name
Red Hat Ceph <10.0.1
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2016-7031"
    }
  },
  "description": "Red Hat Ceph\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u7ea2\u5e3d\uff08Red Hat\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u5957Linux PB\u7ea7\u5206\u5e03\u5f0f\u6587\u4ef6\u7cfb\u7edf\u3002\u8be5\u7cfb\u7edf\u7684\u4e3b\u8981\u76ee\u6807\u662f\u8bbe\u8ba1\u6210\u57fa\u4e8ePOSIX\uff08\u53ef\u79fb\u690d\u64cd\u4f5c\u7cfb\u7edf\u63a5\u53e3\uff09\u7684\u6ca1\u6709\u5355\u70b9\u6545\u969c\u7684\u5206\u5e03\u5f0f\u6587\u4ef6\u7cfb\u7edf\uff0c\u4f7f\u6570\u636e\u80fd\u5bb9\u9519\u548c\u65e0\u7f1d\u7684\u590d\u5236\u3002\r\n\r\nRed Hat Ceph 10.0.1\u4e4b\u524d\u7684\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u7684RGW\u4ee3\u7801\u5b58\u5728\u4fe1\u606f\u6cc4\u9732\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u501f\u52a9URL\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u5217\u51fabucket\u5185\u5bb9\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Red Hat",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u7ecf\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u6b64\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8865\u4e01\u83b7\u53d6\u94fe\u63a5\uff1a\r\nhttp://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/release-notes/#v10-0-1",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-08529",
  "openTime": "2016-10-10",
  "patchDescription": "Red Hat Ceph\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u7ea2\u5e3d\uff08Red Hat\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u5957Linux PB\u7ea7\u5206\u5e03\u5f0f\u6587\u4ef6\u7cfb\u7edf\u3002\u8be5\u7cfb\u7edf\u7684\u4e3b\u8981\u76ee\u6807\u662f\u8bbe\u8ba1\u6210\u57fa\u4e8ePOSIX\uff08\u53ef\u79fb\u690d\u64cd\u4f5c\u7cfb\u7edf\u63a5\u53e3\uff09\u7684\u6ca1\u6709\u5355\u70b9\u6545\u969c\u7684\u5206\u5e03\u5f0f\u6587\u4ef6\u7cfb\u7edf\uff0c\u4f7f\u6570\u636e\u80fd\u5bb9\u9519\u548c\u65e0\u7f1d\u7684\u590d\u5236\u3002\r\n\r\nRed Hat Ceph 10.0.1\u4e4b\u524d\u7684\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u7684RGW\u4ee3\u7801\u5b58\u5728\u4fe1\u606f\u6cc4\u9732\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u501f\u52a9URL\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u5217\u51fabucket\u5185\u5bb9\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Red Hat Ceph RGW\u4fe1\u606f\u6cc4\u9732\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "Red Hat Ceph \u003c10.0.1"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1972.html",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2016-10-09",
  "title": "Red Hat Ceph RGW\u4fe1\u606f\u6cc4\u9732\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…