Vulnerability-Lookup

CNVD-2016-02004

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-04-07

Title

EMC Documentum D2未授权操作漏洞

Description

EMC Documentum D2是高级、直观、可配置且以内容为中心的Documentum客户端，可加快ECM应用程序的采用速度。 EMC Documentum D2 4.6之前版本中多个D2 Configuration对象类型未能正确使用ACL，经身份验证的未授权的用户利用此漏洞可删除或修改此类对象。

Severity

中

Patch Name

EMC Documentum D2未授权操作漏洞的补丁

Patch Description

EMC Documentum D2是高级、直观、可配置且以内容为中心的Documentum客户端，可加快ECM应用程序的采用速度。 EMC Documentum D2 4.6之前版本中多个D2 Configuration对象类型未能正确使用ACL，经身份验证的未授权的用户利用此漏洞可删除或修改此类对象。目前，供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息，修复了此漏洞。

Formal description

目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复这个安全问题，请到厂商的主页下载： http://www.emc.com/enterprise-content-management/documentum-d2.htm

Reference

http://www.emc.com/enterprise-content-management/documentum-d2.htm

Impacted products

Name
EMC Documentum D2 <4.6

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2016-0888"
    }
  },
  "description": "EMC Documentum D2\u662f\u9ad8\u7ea7\u3001\u76f4\u89c2\u3001\u53ef\u914d\u7f6e\u4e14\u4ee5\u5185\u5bb9\u4e3a\u4e2d\u5fc3\u7684Documentum\u5ba2\u6237\u7aef\uff0c\u53ef\u52a0\u5febECM\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u7684\u91c7\u7528\u901f\u5ea6\u3002\r\n\r\nEMC Documentum D2 4.6\u4e4b\u524d\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u591a\u4e2aD2 Configuration\u5bf9\u8c61\u7c7b\u578b\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u4f7f\u7528ACL\uff0c\u7ecf\u8eab\u4efd\u9a8c\u8bc1\u7684\u672a\u6388\u6743\u7684\u7528\u6237\u5229\u7528\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u53ef\u5220\u9664\u6216\u4fee\u6539\u6b64\u7c7b\u5bf9\u8c61\u3002",
  "discovererName": "EMC",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u7ecf\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u8fd9\u4e2a\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8bf7\u5230\u5382\u5546\u7684\u4e3b\u9875\u4e0b\u8f7d\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.emc.com/enterprise-content-management/documentum-d2.htm",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-02004",
  "openTime": "2016-04-07",
  "patchDescription": "EMC Documentum D2\u662f\u9ad8\u7ea7\u3001\u76f4\u89c2\u3001\u53ef\u914d\u7f6e\u4e14\u4ee5\u5185\u5bb9\u4e3a\u4e2d\u5fc3\u7684Documentum\u5ba2\u6237\u7aef\uff0c\u53ef\u52a0\u5febECM\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u7684\u91c7\u7528\u901f\u5ea6\u3002\r\n\r\nEMC Documentum D2 4.6\u4e4b\u524d\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u591a\u4e2aD2 Configuration\u5bf9\u8c61\u7c7b\u578b\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u4f7f\u7528ACL\uff0c\u7ecf\u8eab\u4efd\u9a8c\u8bc1\u7684\u672a\u6388\u6743\u7684\u7528\u6237\u5229\u7528\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u53ef\u5220\u9664\u6216\u4fee\u6539\u6b64\u7c7b\u5bf9\u8c61\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "EMC Documentum D2\u672a\u6388\u6743\u64cd\u4f5c\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "EMC Documentum D2 \u003c4.6"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.emc.com/enterprise-content-management/documentum-d2.htm",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2016-04-06",
  "title": "EMC Documentum D2\u672a\u6388\u6743\u64cd\u4f5c\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}

CVE-2016-0888 (GCVE-0-2016-0888)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2016-04-07 10:00 – Updated: 2024-08-05 22:38

Summary

EMC Documentum D2 before 4.6 lacks intended ACLs for configuration objects, which allows remote authenticated users to modify objects via unspecified vectors.

Severity

No CVSS data available.

CWE

Assigner

dell CNA under the mitre root

CNA scorecard C 70/100 over 522 records in the last 180 days details

References

2 references

URL	Tags
http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/20	mailing-listx_refsource_BUGTRAQ
http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035459	vdb-entryx_refsource_SECTRACK

Date Public

2016-04-04 00:00

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T22:38:40.020Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "20160404 ESA-2016-034: EMC Documentum D2 Configuration Object Vulnerability",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/20"
          },
          {
            "name": "1035459",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_SECTRACK",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035459"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2016-04-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "EMC Documentum D2 before 4.6 lacks intended ACLs for configuration objects, which allows remote authenticated users to modify objects via unspecified vectors."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-01-09T16:57:01.000Z",
        "orgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
        "shortName": "dell"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "20160404 ESA-2016-034: EMC Documentum D2 Configuration Object Vulnerability",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/20"
        },
        {
          "name": "1035459",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_SECTRACK"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035459"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security_alert@emc.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2016-0888",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "EMC Documentum D2 before 4.6 lacks intended ACLs for configuration objects, which allows remote authenticated users to modify objects via unspecified vectors."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "20160404 ESA-2016-034: EMC Documentum D2 Configuration Object Vulnerability",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/20"
            },
            {
              "name": "1035459",
              "refsource": "SECTRACK",
              "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035459"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
    "assignerShortName": "dell",
    "cveId": "CVE-2016-0888",
    "datePublished": "2016-04-07T10:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2015-12-17T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T22:38:40.020Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

Order JSON

How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Publication & reservation Sightings KEV catalogs Other timestamps

Loading timeline…

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted