CNVD-2016-01715

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-03-17
VLAI
Title
Apache Struts I18NInterceptor跨站脚本漏洞
Description
Apache Struts是美国阿帕奇(Apache)软件基金会负责维护的一款用于创建企业级Java Web应用的开源框架。I18NInterceptor是使用在其中的一个国际化拦截器。 Apache Struts 2.0.0版本至2.3.24.1版本的I18NInterceptor中存在跨站脚本漏洞,该漏洞源于程序未能充分验证用户输入。攻击者可利用该漏洞注入任意Web脚本或HTML。
Severity
中
Patch Name
Apache Struts I18NInterceptor跨站脚本漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
Apache Struts是美国阿帕奇(Apache)软件基金会负责维护的一款用于创建企业级Java Web应用的开源框架。I18NInterceptor是使用在其中的一个国际化拦截器。 Apache Struts 2.0.0版本至2.3.24.1版本的I18NInterceptor中存在跨站脚本漏洞,该漏洞源于程序未能充分验证用户输入。攻击者可利用该漏洞注入任意Web脚本或HTML。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复此安全问题,补丁获取链接: http://struts.apache.org/docs/s2-030.html

Reference
http://struts.apache.org/docs/s2-030.html
Impacted products
Name
Apache struts 2.0.0-2.3.24.1
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2016-2162"
    }
  },
  "description": "Apache Struts\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u963f\u5e15\u5947\uff08Apache\uff09\u8f6f\u4ef6\u57fa\u91d1\u4f1a\u8d1f\u8d23\u7ef4\u62a4\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u7528\u4e8e\u521b\u5efa\u4f01\u4e1a\u7ea7Java Web\u5e94\u7528\u7684\u5f00\u6e90\u6846\u67b6\u3002I18NInterceptor\u662f\u4f7f\u7528\u5728\u5176\u4e2d\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u56fd\u9645\u5316\u62e6\u622a\u5668\u3002\r\n\r\nApache Struts 2.0.0\u7248\u672c\u81f32.3.24.1\u7248\u672c\u7684I18NInterceptor\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u672a\u80fd\u5145\u5206\u9a8c\u8bc1\u7528\u6237\u8f93\u5165\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6ce8\u5165\u4efb\u610fWeb\u811a\u672c\u6216HTML\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Apache",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u7ecf\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u6b64\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8865\u4e01\u83b7\u53d6\u94fe\u63a5\uff1a\r\nhttp://struts.apache.org/docs/s2-030.html",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-01715",
  "openTime": "2016-03-17",
  "patchDescription": "Apache Struts\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u963f\u5e15\u5947\uff08Apache\uff09\u8f6f\u4ef6\u57fa\u91d1\u4f1a\u8d1f\u8d23\u7ef4\u62a4\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u7528\u4e8e\u521b\u5efa\u4f01\u4e1a\u7ea7Java Web\u5e94\u7528\u7684\u5f00\u6e90\u6846\u67b6\u3002I18NInterceptor\u662f\u4f7f\u7528\u5728\u5176\u4e2d\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u56fd\u9645\u5316\u62e6\u622a\u5668\u3002\r\n\r\nApache Struts 2.0.0\u7248\u672c\u81f32.3.24.1\u7248\u672c\u7684I18NInterceptor\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u672a\u80fd\u5145\u5206\u9a8c\u8bc1\u7528\u6237\u8f93\u5165\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6ce8\u5165\u4efb\u610fWeb\u811a\u672c\u6216HTML\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Apache Struts I18NInterceptor\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "Apache struts 2.0.0-2.3.24.1"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://struts.apache.org/docs/s2-030.html",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2016-03-16",
  "title": "Apache Struts I18NInterceptor\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.