CNVD-2016-01220

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-02-24
VLAI
Title
Symantec Encryption Management Server (SEMS) 远程拒绝服务漏洞
Description
Symantec Encryption Management Server可以管理并自动化加密解决方案的安全策略。 Symantec Encryption Management Server (SEMS) 3.3.2 MP12之前版本LDAP服务存在安全漏洞。远程攻击者通过构造的请求利用此漏洞可造成拒绝服务(堆内存破坏及服务故障)。
Severity
Patch Name
Symantec Encryption Management Server (SEMS) 远程拒绝服务漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
Symantec Encryption Management Server可以管理并自动化加密解决方案的安全策略。 Symantec Encryption Management Server (SEMS) 3.3.2 MP12之前版本LDAP服务存在安全漏洞。远程攻击者通过构造的请求利用此漏洞可造成拒绝服务(堆内存破坏及服务故障)。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

目前厂商已经发布升级补丁/版本以修复这个安全问题,请用户及时下载更新: http://www.symantec.com/security_response/securityupdates/detail.jsp?fid=security_advisory&pvid=secu

Reference
https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-8149 https://symantec.flexnetoperations.com/
Impacted products
Name
Symantec Encryption Management Server < 3.3.2 MP12
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-8149"
    }
  },
  "description": "Symantec Encryption Management Server\u53ef\u4ee5\u7ba1\u7406\u5e76\u81ea\u52a8\u5316\u52a0\u5bc6\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u7684\u5b89\u5168\u7b56\u7565\u3002\r\n\r\nSymantec Encryption Management Server (SEMS) 3.3.2 MP12\u4e4b\u524d\u7248\u672cLDAP\u670d\u52a1\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u901a\u8fc7\u6784\u9020\u7684\u8bf7\u6c42\u5229\u7528\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u53ef\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u5806\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u53ca\u670d\u52a1\u6545\u969c\uff09\u3002",
  "discovererName": "unknown",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u7ecf\u53d1\u5e03\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01/\u7248\u672c\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u8fd9\u4e2a\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8bf7\u7528\u6237\u53ca\u65f6\u4e0b\u8f7d\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.symantec.com/security_response/securityupdates/detail.jsp?fid=security_advisory\u0026pvid=secu",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-01220",
  "openTime": "2016-02-24",
  "patchDescription": "Symantec Encryption Management Server\u53ef\u4ee5\u7ba1\u7406\u5e76\u81ea\u52a8\u5316\u52a0\u5bc6\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u7684\u5b89\u5168\u7b56\u7565\u3002\r\n\r\nSymantec Encryption Management Server (SEMS) 3.3.2 MP12\u4e4b\u524d\u7248\u672cLDAP\u670d\u52a1\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u901a\u8fc7\u6784\u9020\u7684\u8bf7\u6c42\u5229\u7528\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u53ef\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u5806\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u53ca\u670d\u52a1\u6545\u969c\uff09\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Symantec Encryption Management Server (SEMS) \u8fdc\u7a0b\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "Symantec Encryption Management Server \u003c 3.3.2 MP12"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-8149\r\nhttps://symantec.flexnetoperations.com/",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2016-02-19",
  "title": "Symantec Encryption Management Server (SEMS) \u8fdc\u7a0b\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…