CNVD-2016-00894

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-02-15
VLAI
Title
EClinicalWorks Population Health Client Portal跨站脚本漏洞
Description
EClinicalWorks Population Health是美国EClinicalWorks公司的一套人口健康解决方案,它提供仪表板分析、患者预约、护理计划和患者转诊安全网络等功能。Client Portal是其中的一个门户网站。 EClinicalWorks Population Health Client Portal的portalUserService.jsp脚本存在跨站脚本漏洞,允许远程攻击者利用漏洞注入恶意脚本或HTML代码,当恶意数据被查看时,可获取敏感信息或劫持用户会话。
Severity
中
Formal description

目前没有详细的解决方案提供: https://www.eclinicalworks.com/

Reference
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/82296
Impacted products
Name
EClinicalWorks Population Health Client Portal
Show details on source website

{
  "bids": {
    "bid": {
      "bidNumber": "82296"
    }
  },
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-4591"
    }
  },
  "description": "EClinicalWorks Population Health\u662f\u7f8e\u56fdEClinicalWorks\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u4eba\u53e3\u5065\u5eb7\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u5b83\u63d0\u4f9b\u4eea\u8868\u677f\u5206\u6790\u3001\u60a3\u8005\u9884\u7ea6\u3001\u62a4\u7406\u8ba1\u5212\u548c\u60a3\u8005\u8f6c\u8bca\u5b89\u5168\u7f51\u7edc\u7b49\u529f\u80fd\u3002Client Portal\u662f\u5176\u4e2d\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u95e8\u6237\u7f51\u7ad9\u3002\r\n\r\nEClinicalWorks Population Health Client Portal\u7684portalUserService.jsp\u811a\u672c\u5b58\u5728\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6ce8\u5165\u6076\u610f\u811a\u672c\u6216HTML\u4ee3\u7801\uff0c\u5f53\u6076\u610f\u6570\u636e\u88ab\u67e5\u770b\u65f6\uff0c\u53ef\u83b7\u53d6\u654f\u611f\u4fe1\u606f\u6216\u52ab\u6301\u7528\u6237\u4f1a\u8bdd\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Jerold Hoong.",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u7684\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttps://www.eclinicalworks.com/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-00894",
  "openTime": "2016-02-15",
  "products": {
    "product": "EClinicalWorks Population Health Client Portal"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/82296",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2016-02-08",
  "title": "EClinicalWorks Population Health Client Portal\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.