CNVD-2015-08111

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-12-14
VLAI
Title
Microsoft浏览器内存破坏漏洞(CNVD-2015-08111)
Description
Microsoft Internet Explorer(IE)和Microsoft Edge都是美国微软(Microsoft)公司开发的Web浏览器。前者是Windows 10之前操作系统附带的默认浏览器,后者是最新操作系统Windows 10附带的默认浏览器。 当Microsoft IE 11版本和Microsoft Edge未正确访问内存中的对象,存在内存破坏漏洞。攻击者可以在当前用户的上下文中执行任意代码的方式损坏内存。
Severity
高
Patch Name
Microsoft浏览器内存破坏漏洞(CNVD-2015-08111)的补丁
Patch Description
Microsoft Internet Explorer(IE)和Microsoft Edge都是美国微软(Microsoft)公司开发的Web浏览器。前者是Windows 10之前操作系统附带的默认浏览器,后者是最新操作系统Windows 10附带的默认浏览器。 当Microsoft IE 11版本和Microsoft Edge未正确访问内存中的对象,存在内存破坏漏洞。攻击者可以在当前用户的上下文中执行任意代码的方式损坏内存。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复此安全问题,补丁获取链接: http://technet.microsoft.com/security/bulletin/MS15-125

Reference
http://technet.microsoft.com/security/bulletin/MS15-125
Impacted products
Name
['Microsoft Internet Explorer 11', 'Microsoft Edge']
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-6142"
    }
  },
  "description": "Microsoft Internet Explorer\uff08IE\uff09\u548cMicrosoft Edge\u90fd\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u5fae\u8f6f\uff08Microsoft\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u5f00\u53d1\u7684Web\u6d4f\u89c8\u5668\u3002\u524d\u8005\u662fWindows 10\u4e4b\u524d\u64cd\u4f5c\u7cfb\u7edf\u9644\u5e26\u7684\u9ed8\u8ba4\u6d4f\u89c8\u5668\uff0c\u540e\u8005\u662f\u6700\u65b0\u64cd\u4f5c\u7cfb\u7edfWindows 10\u9644\u5e26\u7684\u9ed8\u8ba4\u6d4f\u89c8\u5668\u3002\r\n\r\n\u5f53Microsoft IE 11\u7248\u672c\u548cMicrosoft Edge\u672a\u6b63\u786e\u8bbf\u95ee\u5185\u5b58\u4e2d\u7684\u5bf9\u8c61\uff0c\u5b58\u5728\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u4ee5\u5728\u5f53\u524d\u7528\u6237\u7684\u4e0a\u4e0b\u6587\u4e2d\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u4ee3\u7801\u7684\u65b9\u5f0f\u635f\u574f\u5185\u5b58\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Microsoft",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u7ecf\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u6b64\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8865\u4e01\u83b7\u53d6\u94fe\u63a5\uff1a\r\nhttp://technet.microsoft.com/security/bulletin/MS15-125",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-08111",
  "openTime": "2015-12-14",
  "patchDescription": "Microsoft Internet Explorer\uff08IE\uff09\u548cMicrosoft Edge\u90fd\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u5fae\u8f6f\uff08Microsoft\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u5f00\u53d1\u7684Web\u6d4f\u89c8\u5668\u3002\u524d\u8005\u662fWindows 10\u4e4b\u524d\u64cd\u4f5c\u7cfb\u7edf\u9644\u5e26\u7684\u9ed8\u8ba4\u6d4f\u89c8\u5668\uff0c\u540e\u8005\u662f\u6700\u65b0\u64cd\u4f5c\u7cfb\u7edfWindows 10\u9644\u5e26\u7684\u9ed8\u8ba4\u6d4f\u89c8\u5668\u3002\r\n\r\n\u5f53Microsoft IE 11\u7248\u672c\u548cMicrosoft Edge\u672a\u6b63\u786e\u8bbf\u95ee\u5185\u5b58\u4e2d\u7684\u5bf9\u8c61\uff0c\u5b58\u5728\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u4ee5\u5728\u5f53\u524d\u7528\u6237\u7684\u4e0a\u4e0b\u6587\u4e2d\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u4ee3\u7801\u7684\u65b9\u5f0f\u635f\u574f\u5185\u5b58\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Microsoft\u6d4f\u89c8\u5668\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff08CNVD-2015-08111\uff09\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "Microsoft Internet Explorer 11",
      "Microsoft Edge"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://technet.microsoft.com/security/bulletin/MS15-125",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2015-12-11",
  "title": "Microsoft\u6d4f\u89c8\u5668\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff08CNVD-2015-08111\uff09"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.