CNVD-2015-07698

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-11-24
VLAI
Title
latex2rtf格式化字符串拒绝服务漏洞
Description
latex2rtf是一款用于将LaTeX文档转换为RTF格式的转换器。 latex2rtf formatted-printing函数未能充分过滤作为格式化说明符的用户输入,允许攻击者利用该漏洞构建恶意文件,诱使应用解析,可使应用程序崩溃。
Severity
中
Formal description

目前没有详细解决方案提供: http://latex2rtf.sourceforge.net/

Reference
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/77597
Impacted products
Name
Latex2rtf Latex2rtf 2.3.8
Show details on source website

{
  "bids": {
    "bid": {
      "bidNumber": "77597"
    }
  },
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-8106"
    }
  },
  "description": "latex2rtf\u662f\u4e00\u6b3e\u7528\u4e8e\u5c06LaTeX\u6587\u6863\u8f6c\u6362\u4e3aRTF\u683c\u5f0f\u7684\u8f6c\u6362\u5668\u3002\r\n\r\nlatex2rtf formatted-printing\u51fd\u6570\u672a\u80fd\u5145\u5206\u8fc7\u6ee4\u4f5c\u4e3a\u683c\u5f0f\u5316\u8bf4\u660e\u7b26\u7684\u7528\u6237\u8f93\u5165\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6784\u5efa\u6076\u610f\u6587\u4ef6\uff0c\u8bf1\u4f7f\u5e94\u7528\u89e3\u6790\uff0c\u53ef\u4f7f\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u5d29\u6e83\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Woosuk Lee and Jong-Gwon Kim",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttp://latex2rtf.sourceforge.net/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-07698",
  "openTime": "2015-11-24",
  "products": {
    "product": "Latex2rtf Latex2rtf 2.3.8"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/77597",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2015-11-22",
  "title": "latex2rtf\u683c\u5f0f\u5316\u5b57\u7b26\u4e32\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.