CNVD-2015-07515

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-11-13
VLAI
Title
SAP HANA DB SQL接口任意代码执行漏洞
Description
SAP HANA DB是德国思爱普(SAP)公司的一个基于行和列的内存数据库。该数据库提供针对多维数据进行快速查询、过滤掉杂乱的无用数据、同步执行多项查询等功能。 SAP HANA DB 1.00.73.00.389160(NewDB100_REL)版本的SQL接口存在安全漏洞。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞执行任意代码。
Severity
Patch Name
SAP HANA DB SQL接口任意代码执行漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
SAP HANA DB是德国思爱普(SAP)公司的一个基于行和列的内存数据库。该数据库提供针对多维数据进行快速查询、过滤掉杂乱的无用数据、同步执行多项查询等功能。 SAP HANA DB 1.00.73.00.389160(NewDB100_REL)版本的SQL接口存在安全漏洞。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞执行任意代码。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

用户可联系供应商获得补丁信息: http://www.sap.com

Reference
https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-7994 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Nov/40 https://www.onapsis.com/research/security-advisories/SAP_HANA_Remote_Code_Execution_SQL_based https://www.onapsis.com/blog/analyzing-sap-security-notes-october-2015
Impacted products
Name
SAP HANA DB 1.00.73.00.389160
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-7994"
    }
  },
  "description": "SAP HANA DB\u662f\u5fb7\u56fd\u601d\u7231\u666e\uff08SAP\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u57fa\u4e8e\u884c\u548c\u5217\u7684\u5185\u5b58\u6570\u636e\u5e93\u3002\u8be5\u6570\u636e\u5e93\u63d0\u4f9b\u9488\u5bf9\u591a\u7ef4\u6570\u636e\u8fdb\u884c\u5feb\u901f\u67e5\u8be2\u3001\u8fc7\u6ee4\u6389\u6742\u4e71\u7684\u65e0\u7528\u6570\u636e\u3001\u540c\u6b65\u6267\u884c\u591a\u9879\u67e5\u8be2\u7b49\u529f\u80fd\u3002\r\n\r\nSAP HANA DB 1.00.73.00.389160(NewDB100_REL)\u7248\u672c\u7684SQL\u63a5\u53e3\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u4ee3\u7801\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Nahuel D. S\u00e1nchez",
  "formalWay": "\u7528\u6237\u53ef\u8054\u7cfb\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u83b7\u5f97\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.sap.com",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-07515",
  "openTime": "2015-11-13",
  "patchDescription": "SAP HANA DB\u662f\u5fb7\u56fd\u601d\u7231\u666e\uff08SAP\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u57fa\u4e8e\u884c\u548c\u5217\u7684\u5185\u5b58\u6570\u636e\u5e93\u3002\u8be5\u6570\u636e\u5e93\u63d0\u4f9b\u9488\u5bf9\u591a\u7ef4\u6570\u636e\u8fdb\u884c\u5feb\u901f\u67e5\u8be2\u3001\u8fc7\u6ee4\u6389\u6742\u4e71\u7684\u65e0\u7528\u6570\u636e\u3001\u540c\u6b65\u6267\u884c\u591a\u9879\u67e5\u8be2\u7b49\u529f\u80fd\u3002\r\nSAP HANA DB 1.00.73.00.389160(NewDB100_REL)\u7248\u672c\u7684SQL\u63a5\u53e3\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u4ee3\u7801\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "SAP HANA DB SQL\u63a5\u53e3\u4efb\u610f\u4ee3\u7801\u6267\u884c\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "SAP HANA DB 1.00.73.00.389160"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-7994\r\nhttp://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Nov/40 \r\nhttps://www.onapsis.com/research/security-advisories/SAP_HANA_Remote_Code_Execution_SQL_based \r\nhttps://www.onapsis.com/blog/analyzing-sap-security-notes-october-2015",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2015-11-12",
  "title": "SAP HANA DB SQL\u63a5\u53e3\u4efb\u610f\u4ee3\u7801\u6267\u884c\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…