CNVD-2015-05893

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-09-09
VLAI
Title
BIND DNSSEC Key处理错误拒绝服务漏洞
Description
ISC BIND是一个应用非常广泛的DNS协议的实现,由ISC负责维护。 ISC BIND 'buffer.c'存在安全漏洞,允许远程用户发送特殊的查询,使远程Zone DNS服务器返回特殊的DNSSEC给目标校验解析器,触发该漏洞,使DNS服务崩溃。
Severity
高
Patch Name
BIND DNSSEC Key处理错误拒绝服务漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
ISC BIND是一个应用非常广泛的DNS协议的实现,由ISC负责维护。ISC BIND 'buffer.c'存在安全漏洞,允许远程用户发送特殊的查询,使远程Zone DNS服务器返回特殊的DNSSEC给目标校验解析器,触发该漏洞,使DNS服务崩溃。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

用户可参考如下厂商提供的安全公告获取补丁以修复该漏洞: https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01287/74/CVE-2015-5722%3A-Parsing-malformed-keys-may-cause-BIND-to-exit-due-to-a-failed-assertion-in-buffer.c.html

Reference
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01287/74/CVE-2015-5722%3A-Parsing-malformed-keys-may-cause-BIND-to-exit-due-to-a-failed-assertion-in-buffer.c.html
Impacted products
Name
['ISC, Inc. BIND 9.x(<9.9.7-P3)', 'ISC, Inc. BIND 9.10.x(<9.10.2-P4)']
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-5722"
    }
  },
  "description": "ISC BIND\u662f\u4e00\u4e2a\u5e94\u7528\u975e\u5e38\u5e7f\u6cdb\u7684DNS\u534f\u8bae\u7684\u5b9e\u73b0,\u7531ISC\u8d1f\u8d23\u7ef4\u62a4\u3002\r\n\r\nISC BIND \u0027buffer.c\u0027\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u7528\u6237\u53d1\u9001\u7279\u6b8a\u7684\u67e5\u8be2\uff0c\u4f7f\u8fdc\u7a0bZone DNS\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u8fd4\u56de\u7279\u6b8a\u7684DNSSEC\u7ed9\u76ee\u6807\u6821\u9a8c\u89e3\u6790\u5668\uff0c\u89e6\u53d1\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u4f7fDNS\u670d\u52a1\u5d29\u6e83\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Michael McNally",
  "formalWay": "\u7528\u6237\u53ef\u53c2\u8003\u5982\u4e0b\u5382\u5546\u63d0\u4f9b\u7684\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u83b7\u53d6\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff1a\r\nhttps://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01287/74/CVE-2015-5722%3A-Parsing-malformed-keys-may-cause-BIND-to-exit-due-to-a-failed-assertion-in-buffer.c.html",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-05893",
  "openTime": "2015-09-09",
  "patchDescription": "ISC BIND\u662f\u4e00\u4e2a\u5e94\u7528\u975e\u5e38\u5e7f\u6cdb\u7684DNS\u534f\u8bae\u7684\u5b9e\u73b0,\u7531ISC\u8d1f\u8d23\u7ef4\u62a4\u3002ISC BIND \u0027buffer.c\u0027\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u7528\u6237\u53d1\u9001\u7279\u6b8a\u7684\u67e5\u8be2\uff0c\u4f7f\u8fdc\u7a0bZone DNS\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u8fd4\u56de\u7279\u6b8a\u7684DNSSEC\u7ed9\u76ee\u6807\u6821\u9a8c\u89e3\u6790\u5668\uff0c\u89e6\u53d1\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u4f7fDNS\u670d\u52a1\u5d29\u6e83\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "BIND DNSSEC Key\u5904\u7406\u9519\u8bef\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "ISC, Inc. BIND 9.x(\u003c9.9.7-P3)",
      "ISC, Inc. BIND 9.10.x(\u003c9.10.2-P4)"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01287/74/CVE-2015-5722%3A-Parsing-malformed-keys-may-cause-BIND-to-exit-due-to-a-failed-assertion-in-buffer.c.html",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2015-09-06",
  "title": "BIND DNSSEC Key\u5904\u7406\u9519\u8bef\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.