CNVD-2015-03977
Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-06-25
VLAI Severity ?
Title
TickFa SQL注入漏洞
Description
TickFa是一套在线客户支持系统。
TickFa存在SQL注入漏洞,由于程序中的ticket.php脚本未能正确‘tid’参数输入,允许远程攻击者利用漏洞提交特制的SQL查询,操作或获取数据库数据。
Severity
中
Formal description
目前没有详细解决方案提供: http://tickfa.aftab.cc/
Reference
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/132186/TickFa-1.x-SQL-Injection.html
Impacted products
| Name | aftab TickFa 1.x |
|---|
{
"bids": {
"bid": {
"bidNumber": "75343"
}
},
"cves": {
"cve": {
"cveNumber": "CVE-2015-4676"
}
},
"description": "TickFa\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u5728\u7ebf\u5ba2\u6237\u652f\u6301\u7cfb\u7edf\u3002\r\n\r\nTickFa\u5b58\u5728SQL\u6ce8\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u7531\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u4e2d\u7684ticket.php\u811a\u672c\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u2018tid\u2019\u53c2\u6570\u8f93\u5165\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e\u63d0\u4ea4\u7279\u5236\u7684SQL\u67e5\u8be2\uff0c\u64cd\u4f5c\u6216\u83b7\u53d6\u6570\u636e\u5e93\u6570\u636e\u3002",
"discovererName": "Mohammad Reza Espargham",
"formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttp://tickfa.aftab.cc/",
"isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
"number": "CNVD-2015-03977",
"openTime": "2015-06-25",
"products": {
"product": "aftab TickFa 1.x"
},
"referenceLink": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/132186/TickFa-1.x-SQL-Injection.html",
"serverity": "\u4e2d",
"submitTime": "2015-06-23",
"title": "TickFa SQL\u6ce8\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…