CNVD-2015-03977

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-06-25
VLAI Severity ?
Title
TickFa SQL注入漏洞
Description
TickFa是一套在线客户支持系统。 TickFa存在SQL注入漏洞,由于程序中的ticket.php脚本未能正确‘tid’参数输入,允许远程攻击者利用漏洞提交特制的SQL查询,操作或获取数据库数据。
Severity
Formal description

目前没有详细解决方案提供: http://tickfa.aftab.cc/

Reference
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/132186/TickFa-1.x-SQL-Injection.html
Impacted products
Name
aftab TickFa 1.x
Show details on source website

{
  "bids": {
    "bid": {
      "bidNumber": "75343"
    }
  },
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-4676"
    }
  },
  "description": "TickFa\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u5728\u7ebf\u5ba2\u6237\u652f\u6301\u7cfb\u7edf\u3002\r\n\r\nTickFa\u5b58\u5728SQL\u6ce8\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u7531\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u4e2d\u7684ticket.php\u811a\u672c\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u2018tid\u2019\u53c2\u6570\u8f93\u5165\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e\u63d0\u4ea4\u7279\u5236\u7684SQL\u67e5\u8be2\uff0c\u64cd\u4f5c\u6216\u83b7\u53d6\u6570\u636e\u5e93\u6570\u636e\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Mohammad Reza Espargham",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttp://tickfa.aftab.cc/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-03977",
  "openTime": "2015-06-25",
  "products": {
    "product": "aftab TickFa 1.x"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/132186/TickFa-1.x-SQL-Injection.html",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2015-06-23",
  "title": "TickFa SQL\u6ce8\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…