CNVD-2015-01245

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-02-27
VLAI
Title
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Backup-Archive client身份验证绕过漏洞
Description
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager(TSM)是美国IBM公司的一套备份和恢复管理解决方案,它支持数据保护、空间管理和存档、业务恢复和灾难恢复等。IBM TSM Backup-Archive Client是其中的一个备份归档客户端。 IBM TSM for Mail的IBM TSM Backup-Archive客户端的Java GUI和Web GUI组件中存在安全漏洞。当程序使用Data Protection for Lotus Domino组件时,本地攻击者可利用该漏洞绕过身份验证,恢复Domino数据库或transaction-log备份。
Severity
低
Patch Name
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Backup-Archive client身份验证绕过漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager(TSM)是美国IBM公司的一套备份和恢复管理解决方案,它支持数据保护、空间管理和存档、业务恢复和灾难恢复等。IBM TSM Backup-Archive Client是其中的一个备份归档客户端。 IBM TSM for Mail的IBM TSM Backup-Archive客户端的Java GUI和Web GUI组件中存在安全漏洞。当程序使用Data Protection for Lotus Domino组件时,本地攻击者可利用该漏洞绕过身份验证,恢复Domino数据库或transaction-log备份。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

用户可参考如下厂商提供的安全公告获取补丁以修复该漏洞:http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/98607

Reference
http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/98607 http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-6195
Impacted products
Name
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) Backup-Archive client 5.4
Show details on source website

{
  "bids": {
    "bid": {
      "bidNumber": "72860"
    }
  },
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2014-6195"
    }
  },
  "description": "IBM Tivoli Storage Manager\uff08TSM\uff09\u662f\u7f8e\u56fdIBM\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u5907\u4efd\u548c\u6062\u590d\u7ba1\u7406\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u5b83\u652f\u6301\u6570\u636e\u4fdd\u62a4\u3001\u7a7a\u95f4\u7ba1\u7406\u548c\u5b58\u6863\u3001\u4e1a\u52a1\u6062\u590d\u548c\u707e\u96be\u6062\u590d\u7b49\u3002IBM TSM Backup-Archive Client\u662f\u5176\u4e2d\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u5907\u4efd\u5f52\u6863\u5ba2\u6237\u7aef\u3002\r\n\r\nIBM TSM for Mail\u7684IBM TSM Backup-Archive\u5ba2\u6237\u7aef\u7684Java GUI\u548cWeb GUI\u7ec4\u4ef6\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u5f53\u7a0b\u5e8f\u4f7f\u7528Data Protection for Lotus Domino\u7ec4\u4ef6\u65f6\uff0c\u672c\u5730\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7ed5\u8fc7\u8eab\u4efd\u9a8c\u8bc1\uff0c\u6062\u590dDomino\u6570\u636e\u5e93\u6216transaction-log\u5907\u4efd\u3002",
  "discovererName": "unknown",
  "formalWay": "\u7528\u6237\u53ef\u53c2\u8003\u5982\u4e0b\u5382\u5546\u63d0\u4f9b\u7684\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u83b7\u53d6\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff1ahttp://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/98607",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-01245",
  "openTime": "2015-02-27",
  "patchDescription": "IBM Tivoli Storage Manager\uff08TSM\uff09\u662f\u7f8e\u56fdIBM\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u5907\u4efd\u548c\u6062\u590d\u7ba1\u7406\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u5b83\u652f\u6301\u6570\u636e\u4fdd\u62a4\u3001\u7a7a\u95f4\u7ba1\u7406\u548c\u5b58\u6863\u3001\u4e1a\u52a1\u6062\u590d\u548c\u707e\u96be\u6062\u590d\u7b49\u3002IBM TSM Backup-Archive Client\u662f\u5176\u4e2d\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u5907\u4efd\u5f52\u6863\u5ba2\u6237\u7aef\u3002\r\n\r\nIBM TSM for Mail\u7684IBM TSM Backup-Archive\u5ba2\u6237\u7aef\u7684Java GUI\u548cWeb GUI\u7ec4\u4ef6\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u5f53\u7a0b\u5e8f\u4f7f\u7528Data Protection for Lotus Domino\u7ec4\u4ef6\u65f6\uff0c\u672c\u5730\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7ed5\u8fc7\u8eab\u4efd\u9a8c\u8bc1\uff0c\u6062\u590dDomino\u6570\u636e\u5e93\u6216transaction-log\u5907\u4efd\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Backup-Archive client\u8eab\u4efd\u9a8c\u8bc1\u7ed5\u8fc7\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) Backup-Archive client  5.4"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/98607\r\nhttp://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-6195",
  "serverity": "\u4f4e",
  "submitTime": "2015-02-21",
  "title": "IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Backup-Archive client\u8eab\u4efd\u9a8c\u8bc1\u7ed5\u8fc7\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.