Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
Vulnerability from cleanstart
Package stargate version 1.0.90-r4 fixes 87 vulnerabilities: ghsa-76h9-2vwh-w278, ghsa-pqr6-cmr2-h8hf, ghsa-fjpj-2g6w-x25r, ghsa-qcwq-55hx-v3vh, ghsa-55g7-9cwv-5qfv...
| URL | Type | |
|---|---|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Alpine",
"name": "stargate"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.90-r4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.0.90-r4"
]
}
],
"credits": [],
"database_specific": {},
"details": "Package stargate version 1.0.90-r4 fixes 87 vulnerabilities: ghsa-76h9-2vwh-w278, ghsa-pqr6-cmr2-h8hf, ghsa-fjpj-2g6w-x25r, ghsa-qcwq-55hx-v3vh, ghsa-55g7-9cwv-5qfv...",
"id": "CLEANSTART-2026-CU18187",
"modified": "2026-07-30T09:30:59Z",
"published": "2026-07-30T07:10:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/stargate/stargate"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.3",
"summary": "Security fixes in stargate 1.0.90-r4",
"upstream": [
"ghsa-76h9-2vwh-w278",
"ghsa-pqr6-cmr2-h8hf",
"ghsa-fjpj-2g6w-x25r",
"ghsa-qcwq-55hx-v3vh",
"ghsa-55g7-9cwv-5qfv",
"ghsa-4g8c-wm8x-jfhw",
"ghsa-q4rv-gq96-w7c5",
"ghsa-g8m5-722r-8whq",
"ghsa-j26w-f9rq-mr2q",
"ghsa-xq3w-v528-46rv",
"ghsa-389x-839f-4rhx",
"ghsa-3p8m-j85q-pgmj",
"ghsa-269q-hmxg-m83q",
"ghsa-5jpm-x58v-624v",
"ghsa-84h7-rjj3-6jx4",
"ghsa-fghv-69vj-qj49",
"ghsa-jq43-27x9-3v86",
"ghsa-prj3-ccx8-p6x4",
"ghsa-xpw8-rcwv-8f8p",
"ghsa-6mjq-h674-j845",
"ghsa-fx2c-96vj-985v",
"ghsa-h9mq-f6q5-6c8m",
"ghsa-g5ww-5jh7-63cx",
"ghsa-735f-pc8j-v9w8",
"ghsa-4gg5-vx3j-xwc7",
"ghsa-h4h5-3hr4-j3g2",
"ghsa-mvr2-9pj6-7w5j",
"ghsa-7g45-4rm6-3mm3",
"ghsa-5mg8-w23w-74h3",
"ghsa-gvpg-vgmx-xg6w",
"ghsa-xwmg-2g98-w7v9",
"ghsa-wxr5-93ph-8wr9",
"ghsa-cfxw-4h78-h7fw",
"ghsa-78wr-2p64-hpwj",
"ghsa-493p-pfq6-5258",
"ghsa-264p-99wq-f4j6",
"ghsa-pr98-23f8-jwxv",
"ghsa-25qh-j22f-pwp8",
"ghsa-6v67-2wr5-gvf4",
"ghsa-qqpg-mvqg-649v",
"ghsa-j288-q9x7-2f5v",
"CVE-2024-52046",
"CVE-2021-41973",
"CVE-2022-41881",
"CVE-2023-34462",
"CVE-2023-44487",
"CVE-2022-24823",
"CVE-2024-29025",
"CVE-2025-67735",
"CVE-2025-58056",
"CVE-2025-58057",
"CVE-2025-55163",
"CVE-2025-59419",
"CVE-2024-47535",
"CVE-2025-25193",
"CVE-2025-24970",
"CVE-2023-34455",
"CVE-2023-43642",
"CVE-2023-34453",
"CVE-2023-34454",
"CVE-2024-21634",
"CVE-2023-1370",
"CVE-2025-23015",
"CVE-2018-10237",
"CVE-2023-2976",
"CVE-2020-8908",
"CVE-2024-7254",
"CVE-2022-3509",
"CVE-2022-3510",
"CVE-2022-3171",
"CVE-2024-40094",
"CVE-2023-52428",
"CVE-2025-53864",
"CVE-2025-48734",
"CVE-2024-47554",
"CVE-2024-25638",
"CVE-2024-35255",
"CVE-2026-1225",
"CVE-2024-12798",
"CVE-2025-11226",
"CVE-2024-12801",
"CVE-2024-13009",
"CVE-2024-8184",
"CVE-2024-9823",
"CVE-2024-6763",
"CVE-2025-48924",
"CVE-2025-46392"
]
}
GHSA-Q4RV-GQ96-W7C5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-08 19:28 – Updated: 2025-05-08 19:28In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 to 9.4.56 a buffer can be incorrectly released when confronted with a gzip error when inflating a request body. This can result in corrupted and/or inadvertent sharing of data between requests.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 9.4.56"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "9.4.0"
},
{
"fixed": "9.4.57.v20241219"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-13009"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-404"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-05-08T19:28:34Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-08T18:15:41Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 to 9.4.56 a buffer can be incorrectly released when confronted with a gzip error when inflating a request body. This can result in corrupted and/or inadvertent sharing of data between requests.",
"id": "GHSA-q4rv-gq96-w7c5",
"modified": "2025-05-08T19:28:34Z",
"published": "2025-05-08T19:28:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-q4rv-gq96-w7c5"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-13009"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignement/-/issues/48"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "**UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED** GzipHandler causes part of request body to be seen as request body of a separate request"
}
GHSA-QCWQ-55HX-V3VH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-06-15 17:15 – Updated: 2023-08-18 15:45Summary
Due to use of an unchecked chunk length, an unrecoverable fatal error can occur.
Impact
Denial of Service
Description
The code in the function hasNextChunk in the file SnappyInputStream.java checks if a given stream has more chunks to read. It does that by attempting to read 4 bytes. If it wasn’t possible to read the 4 bytes, the function returns false. Otherwise, if 4 bytes were available, the code treats them as the length of the next chunk.
int readBytes = readNext(header, 0, 4);
if (readBytes < 4) {
return false;
}
int chunkSize = SnappyOutputStream.readInt(header, 0);
if (chunkSize == SnappyCodec.MAGIC_HEADER_HEAD) {
.........
}
// extend the compressed data buffer size
if (compressed == null || chunkSize > compressed.length) {
compressed = new byte[chunkSize];
}
In the case that the “compressed” variable is null, a byte array is allocated with the size given by the input data. Since the code doesn’t test the legality of the “chunkSize” variable, it is possible to pass a negative number (such as 0xFFFFFFFF which is -1), which will cause the code to raise a “java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException” exception. A worse case would happen when passing a huge positive value (such as 0x7FFFFFFF), which would raise the fatal “java.lang.OutOfMemoryError” error.
Steps To Reproduce
Compile and run the following code:
package org.example;
import org.xerial.snappy.SnappyInputStream;
import java.io.*;
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
byte[] data = {-126, 'S', 'N', 'A', 'P', 'P', 'Y', 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,(byte) 0x7f, (byte) 0xff, (byte) 0xff, (byte) 0xff};
SnappyInputStream in = new SnappyInputStream(new ByteArrayInputStream(data));
byte[] out = new byte[50];
try {
in.read(out);
}
catch (Exception ignored) {
}
}
}
The program will crash with the following error (or similar), even though there is a catch clause, since “OutOfMemoryError” does not get caught by catching the “Exception” class:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Requested array size exceeds VM limit
at org.xerial.snappy.SnappyInputStream.hasNextChunk(SnappyInputStream.java:422)
at org.xerial.snappy.SnappyInputStream.read(SnappyInputStream.java:167)
at java.base/java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:217)
at org.example.Main.main(Main.java:12)
Alternatively - compile and run the following code:
package org.example;
import org.xerial.snappy.SnappyInputStream;
import java.io.*;
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
byte[] data = {-126, 'S', 'N', 'A', 'P', 'P', 'Y', 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,(byte) 0xff, (byte) 0xff, (byte) 0xff, (byte) 0xff};
SnappyInputStream in = new SnappyInputStream(new ByteArrayInputStream(data));
byte[] out = new byte[50];
in.read(out);
}
}
The program will crash with the following error (or similar):
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException: -1
at org.xerial.snappy.SnappyInputStream.hasNextChunk(SnappyInputStream.java:422)
at org.xerial.snappy.SnappyInputStream.read(SnappyInputStream.java:167)
at java.base/java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:217)
at org.example.Main.main(Main.java:12)
It is important to note that these examples were written by using a flow that is generally used by developers, and can be seen for example in the Apache project “flume”: https://github.com/apache/flume/blob/f9dbb2de255d59e35e3668a5c6c66a268a055207/flume-ng-channels/flume-file-channel/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/file/Serialization.java#L278. Since they used try-catch, the “NegativeArraySizeException” exception won’t harm their users, but the “OutOfMemoryError” error can.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.1.10.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.xerial.snappy:snappy-java"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.1.10.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-34455"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-06-15T17:15:06Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-06-15T18:15:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\nDue to use of an unchecked chunk length, an unrecoverable fatal error can occur.\n## Impact\nDenial of Service\n## Description\nThe code in the function [hasNextChunk](https://github.com/xerial/snappy-java/blob/05c39b2ca9b5b7b39611529cc302d3d796329611/src/main/java/org/xerial/snappy/SnappyInputStream.java#L388) in the file [SnappyInputStream.java](https://github.com/xerial/snappy-java/blob/master/src/main/java/org/xerial/snappy/SnappyInputStream.java) checks if a given stream has more chunks to read. It does that by attempting to read 4 bytes. If it wasn\u2019t possible to read the 4 bytes, the function returns false. Otherwise, if 4 bytes were available, the code treats them as the length of the next chunk.\n\n\n\n```java\n int readBytes = readNext(header, 0, 4);\n if (readBytes \u003c 4) {\n return false;\n }\n\n int chunkSize = SnappyOutputStream.readInt(header, 0);\n if (chunkSize == SnappyCodec.MAGIC_HEADER_HEAD) {\n .........\n }\n\n // extend the compressed data buffer size\n if (compressed == null || chunkSize \u003e compressed.length) {\n compressed = new byte[chunkSize];\n }\n\n```\n\nIn the case that the \u201ccompressed\u201d variable is null, a byte array is allocated with the size given by the input data. Since the code doesn\u2019t test the legality of the \u201cchunkSize\u201d variable, it is possible to pass a negative number (such as 0xFFFFFFFF which is -1), which will cause the code to raise a \u201cjava.lang.NegativeArraySizeException\u201d exception. A worse case would happen when passing a huge positive value (such as 0x7FFFFFFF), which would raise the fatal \u201cjava.lang.OutOfMemoryError\u201d error.\n\n\n## Steps To Reproduce\nCompile and run the following code:\n\n```java\npackage org.example;\nimport org.xerial.snappy.SnappyInputStream;\n\nimport java.io.*;\n\npublic class Main {\n\n public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {\n byte[] data = {-126, \u0027S\u0027, \u0027N\u0027, \u0027A\u0027, \u0027P\u0027, \u0027P\u0027, \u0027Y\u0027, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,(byte) 0x7f, (byte) 0xff, (byte) 0xff, (byte) 0xff};\n SnappyInputStream in = new SnappyInputStream(new ByteArrayInputStream(data));\n byte[] out = new byte[50];\n try {\n in.read(out);\n }\n catch (Exception ignored) {\n\n }\n }\n}\n```\n\nThe program will crash with the following error (or similar), even though there is a catch clause, since \u201cOutOfMemoryError\u201d does not get caught by catching the \u201cException\u201d class:\n\n```\nException in thread \"main\" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Requested array size exceeds VM limit\n\tat org.xerial.snappy.SnappyInputStream.hasNextChunk(SnappyInputStream.java:422)\n\tat org.xerial.snappy.SnappyInputStream.read(SnappyInputStream.java:167)\n\tat java.base/java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:217)\n\tat org.example.Main.main(Main.java:12)\n\n```\n\n\nAlternatively - compile and run the following code:\n\n```java\npackage org.example;\nimport org.xerial.snappy.SnappyInputStream;\n\nimport java.io.*;\n\npublic class Main {\n\n public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {\n byte[] data = {-126, \u0027S\u0027, \u0027N\u0027, \u0027A\u0027, \u0027P\u0027, \u0027P\u0027, \u0027Y\u0027, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,(byte) 0xff, (byte) 0xff, (byte) 0xff, (byte) 0xff};\n SnappyInputStream in = new SnappyInputStream(new ByteArrayInputStream(data));\n byte[] out = new byte[50];\n in.read(out);\n }\n}\n```\n\nThe program will crash with the following error (or similar):\n\n```\nException in thread \"main\" java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException: -1\n\tat org.xerial.snappy.SnappyInputStream.hasNextChunk(SnappyInputStream.java:422)\n\tat org.xerial.snappy.SnappyInputStream.read(SnappyInputStream.java:167)\n\tat java.base/java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:217)\n\tat org.example.Main.main(Main.java:12)\n\n```\n\n\nIt is important to note that these examples were written by using a flow that is generally used by developers, and can be seen for example in the Apache project \u201cflume\u201d: https://github.com/apache/flume/blob/f9dbb2de255d59e35e3668a5c6c66a268a055207/flume-ng-channels/flume-file-channel/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/file/Serialization.java#L278. Since they used try-catch, the \u201cNegativeArraySizeException\u201d exception won\u2019t harm their users, but the \u201cOutOfMemoryError\u201d error can.",
"id": "GHSA-qcwq-55hx-v3vh",
"modified": "2023-08-18T15:45:35Z",
"published": "2023-06-15T17:15:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/xerial/snappy-java/security/advisories/GHSA-qcwq-55hx-v3vh"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-34455"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/xerial/snappy-java/commit/3bf67857fcf70d9eea56eed4af7c925671e8eaea"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/xerial/snappy-java"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/xerial/snappy-java/blob/05c39b2ca9b5b7b39611529cc302d3d796329611/src/main/java/org/xerial/snappy/SnappyInputStream.java#L388"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/xerial/snappy-java/blob/master/src/main/java/org/xerial/snappy/SnappyInputStream.java"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230818-0009"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "snappy-java\u0027s unchecked chunk length leads to DoS"
}
GHSA-QQPG-MVQG-649V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-22 12:31 – Updated: 2026-01-22 18:06ACE vulnerability in configuration file processing by QOS.CH logback-core up to and including version 1.5.24 in Java applications, allows an attacker to instantiate classes already present on the class path by compromising an existing logback configuration file.
The instantiation of a potentially malicious Java class requires that said class is present on the user's class-path. In addition, the attacker must have write access to a configuration file. However, after successful instantiation, the instance is very likely to be discarded with no further ado.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "ch.qos.logback:logback-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.5.25"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-1225"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-22T18:06:44Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-22T10:16:07Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "ACE vulnerability in configuration file processing by QOS.CH logback-core up to and including version 1.5.24 in Java applications, allows an attacker to instantiate classes already present on the class path by compromising an existing logback configuration file.\n\nThe instantiation of a potentially malicious Java class requires that said class is present on the user\u0027s class-path. In addition, the attacker must have write access to a configuration file. However, after successful instantiation, the instance is very likely to be discarded with no further ado.",
"id": "GHSA-qqpg-mvqg-649v",
"modified": "2026-01-22T18:06:44Z",
"published": "2026-01-22T12:31:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1225"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/issues/997"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/commit/1f97ae1844b1be8486e4e9cade98d7123d3eded5"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/qos-ch/logback"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://logback.qos.ch/news.html#1.5.25"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Logback allows an attacker to instantiate classes already present on the class path"
}
GHSA-WXR5-93PH-8WR9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-28 15:34 – Updated: 2025-11-03 21:33Improper Access Control vulnerability in Apache Commons.
A special BeanIntrospector class was added in version 1.9.2. This can be used to stop attackers from using the declared class property of Java enum objects to get access to the classloader. However this protection was not enabled by default. PropertyUtilsBean (and consequently BeanUtilsBean) now disallows declared class level property access by default.
Releases 1.11.0 and 2.0.0-M2 address a potential security issue when accessing enum properties in an uncontrolled way. If an application using Commons BeanUtils passes property paths from an external source directly to the getProperty() method of PropertyUtilsBean, an attacker can access the enum’s class loader via the “declaredClass” property available on all Java “enum” objects. Accessing the enum’s “declaredClass” allows remote attackers to access the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code. The same issue exists with PropertyUtilsBean.getNestedProperty(). Starting in versions 1.11.0 and 2.0.0-M2 a special BeanIntrospector suppresses the “declaredClass” property. Note that this new BeanIntrospector is enabled by default, but you can disable it to regain the old behavior; see section 2.5 of the user's guide and the unit tests.
This issue affects Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.x before 1.11.0, and 2.x before 2.0.0-M2.Users of the artifact commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils
1.x are recommended to upgrade to version 1.11.0, which fixes the issue.
Users of the artifact org.apache.commons:commons-beanutils2
2.x are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.0-M2, which fixes the issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.10.1"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.11.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.commons:commons-beanutils2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.0.0-M1"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.0-M2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-48734"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-05-28T17:37:18Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-28T14:15:34Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Improper Access Control vulnerability in Apache Commons.\n\n\n\nA special BeanIntrospector class was added in version 1.9.2. This can be used to stop attackers from using the declared class property of Java enum objects to get access to the classloader. However this protection was not enabled by default. PropertyUtilsBean (and consequently BeanUtilsBean) now disallows declared class level property access by default.\n\n\n\n\n\nReleases 1.11.0 and 2.0.0-M2 address a potential security issue when accessing enum properties in an uncontrolled way. If an application using Commons BeanUtils passes property paths from an external source directly to the getProperty() method of PropertyUtilsBean, an attacker can access the enum\u2019s class loader via the \u201cdeclaredClass\u201d property available on all Java \u201cenum\u201d objects. Accessing the enum\u2019s \u201cdeclaredClass\u201d allows remote attackers to access the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code. The same issue exists with PropertyUtilsBean.getNestedProperty().\nStarting in versions 1.11.0 and 2.0.0-M2 a special BeanIntrospector suppresses the \u201cdeclaredClass\u201d property. Note that this new BeanIntrospector is enabled by default, but you can disable it to regain the old behavior; see section 2.5 of the user\u0027s guide and the unit tests.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.x before 1.11.0, and 2.x before 2.0.0-M2.Users of the artifact commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils\n\n 1.x are recommended to upgrade to version 1.11.0, which fixes the issue.\n\n\nUsers of the artifact org.apache.commons:commons-beanutils2\n\n 2.x are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.0-M2, which fixes the issue.",
"id": "GHSA-wxr5-93ph-8wr9",
"modified": "2025-11-03T21:33:58Z",
"published": "2025-05-28T15:34:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-48734"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/commit/bd20740da25b69552ddef8523beec0837297eaf9"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/s0hb3jkfj5f3ryx6c57zqtfohb0of1g9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/06/msg00027.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/05/28/6"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Apache Commons Improper Access Control vulnerability"
}
GHSA-XPW8-RCWV-8F8P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-10 22:22 – Updated: 2023-11-06 22:08A client might overload the server by issue frequent RST frames. This can cause a massive amount of load on the remote system and so cause a DDOS attack.
Impact
This is a DDOS attack, any http2 server is affected and so you should update as soon as possible.
Patches
This is patched in version 4.1.100.Final.
Workarounds
A user can limit the amount of RST frames that are accepted per connection over a timeframe manually using either an own Http2FrameListener implementation or an ChannelInboundHandler implementation (depending which http2 API is used).
References
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487
- https://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-breakdown-http2-rapid-reset-ddos-attack/
- https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/google-cloud-mitigated-largest-ddos-attack-peaking-above-398-million-rps/
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "io.netty:netty-codec-http2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.1.100.Final"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-10-10T22:22:54Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A client might overload the server by issue frequent RST frames. This can cause a massive amount of load on the remote system and so cause a DDOS attack. \n\n### Impact\nThis is a DDOS attack, any http2 server is affected and so you should update as soon as possible.\n\n### Patches\nThis is patched in version 4.1.100.Final.\n\n### Workarounds\nA user can limit the amount of RST frames that are accepted per connection over a timeframe manually using either an own `Http2FrameListener` implementation or an `ChannelInboundHandler` implementation (depending which http2 API is used).\n\n### References\n- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487\n- https://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-breakdown-http2-rapid-reset-ddos-attack/\n- https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/google-cloud-mitigated-largest-ddos-attack-peaking-above-398-million-rps/",
"id": "GHSA-xpw8-rcwv-8f8p",
"modified": "2023-11-06T22:08:35Z",
"published": "2023-10-10T22:22:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apple/swift-nio-http2/security/advisories/GHSA-qppj-fm5r-hxr3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-xpw8-rcwv-8f8p"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-44487"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/58f75f665aa81a8cbcf6ffa74820042a285c5e61"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "io.netty:netty-codec-http2 vulnerable to HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack"
}
GHSA-XQ3W-V528-46RV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-12 19:53 – Updated: 2025-02-18 15:57Summary
An unsafe reading of environment file could potentially cause a denial of service in Netty. When loaded on an Windows application, Netty attemps to load a file that does not exist. If an attacker creates such a large file, the Netty application crash.
Details
When the library netty is loaded in a java windows application, the library tries to identify the system environnement in which it is executed.
At this stage, Netty tries to load both /etc/os-release and /usr/lib/os-release even though it is in a Windows environment.
If netty finds this files, it reads them and loads them into memory.
By default :
- The JVM maximum memory size is set to 1 GB,
- A non-privileged user can create a directory at
C:\and create files within it.
the source code identified : https://github.com/netty/netty/blob/4.1/common/src/main/java/io/netty/util/internal/PlatformDependent.java
Despite the implementation of the function normalizeOs() the source code not verify the OS before reading C:\etc\os-release and C:\usr\lib\os-release.
PoC
Create a file larger than 1 GB of data in C:\etc\os-release or C:\usr\lib\os-release on a Windows environnement and start your Netty application.
To observe what the application does with the file, the security analyst used "Process Monitor" from the "Windows SysInternals" suite. (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/)
cd C:\etc
fsutil file createnew os-release 3000000000
The source code used is the Netty website code example : Echo ‐ the very basic client and server.
The vulnerability was tested on the 4.1.112.Final version.
The security analyst tried the same technique for C:\proc\sys\net\core\somaxconn with a lot of values to impact Netty but the only things that works is the "larger than 1 GB file" technique. https://github.com/netty/netty/blob/c0fdb8e9f8f256990e902fcfffbbe10754d0f3dd/common/src/main/java/io/netty/util/NetUtil.java#L186
Impact
By loading the "file larger than 1 GB" into the memory, the Netty library exceeds the JVM memory limit and causes a crash in the java Windows application.
This behaviour occurs 100% of the time in both Server mode and Client mode if the large file exists.
Client mode :
Server mode :
somaxconn :
Severity
- Attack vector : "Local" because the attacker needs to be on the system where the Netty application is running.
- Attack complexity : "Low" because the attacker only need to create a massive file (regardless of its contents).
- Privileges required : "Low" because the attacker requires a user account to exploit the vulnerability.
- User intercation : "None" because the administrator don't need to accidentally click anywhere to trigger the vulnerability. Furthermore, the exploitation works with defaults windows/AD settings.
- Scope : "Unchanged" because only Netty is affected by the vulnerability.
- Confidentiality : "None" because no data is exposed through exploiting the vulnerability.
- Integrity : "None" because the explotation of the vulnerability does not allow editing, deleting or adding data elsewhere.
- Availability : "High" because the exploitation of this vulnerability crashes the entire java application.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.1.114.Final"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "io.netty:netty-common"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.1.115.Final"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-47535"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-11-12T19:53:17Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-12T16:15:22Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nAn unsafe reading of environment file could potentially cause a denial of service in Netty.\nWhen loaded on an Windows application, Netty attemps to load a file that does not exist. If an attacker creates such a large file, the Netty application crash.\n\n\n### Details\n\nWhen the library netty is loaded in a java windows application, the library tries to identify the system environnement in which it is executed.\n\nAt this stage, Netty tries to load both `/etc/os-release` and `/usr/lib/os-release` even though it is in a Windows environment. \n\n\u003cimg width=\"364\" alt=\"1\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9466b181-9394-45a3-b0e3-1dcf105def59\"\u003e\n\nIf netty finds this files, it reads them and loads them into memory.\n\nBy default :\n\n- The JVM maximum memory size is set to 1 GB,\n- A non-privileged user can create a directory at `C:\\` and create files within it.\n\n\u003cimg width=\"340\" alt=\"2\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/43b359a2-5871-4592-ae2b-ffc40ac76831\"\u003e\n\n\u003cimg width=\"523\" alt=\"3\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ad5c6eed-451c-4513-92d5-ba0eee7715c1\"\u003e\n\nthe source code identified :\nhttps://github.com/netty/netty/blob/4.1/common/src/main/java/io/netty/util/internal/PlatformDependent.java\n\nDespite the implementation of the function `normalizeOs()` the source code not verify the OS before reading `C:\\etc\\os-release` and `C:\\usr\\lib\\os-release`.\n\n### PoC\n\nCreate a file larger than 1 GB of data in `C:\\etc\\os-release` or `C:\\usr\\lib\\os-release` on a Windows environnement and start your Netty application.\n\nTo observe what the application does with the file, the security analyst used \"Process Monitor\" from the \"Windows SysInternals\" suite. (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/)\n\n```\ncd C:\\etc\nfsutil file createnew os-release 3000000000\n```\n\n\u003cimg width=\"519\" alt=\"4\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/39df22a3-462b-4fd0-af9a-aa30077ec08f\"\u003e\n\n\u003cimg width=\"517\" alt=\"5\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/129dbd50-fc36-4da5-8eb1-582123fb528f\"\u003e\n\nThe source code used is the Netty website code example : [Echo \u2010 the very basic client and server](https://netty.io/4.1/xref/io/netty/example/echo/package-summary.html).\n\nThe vulnerability was tested on the 4.1.112.Final version.\n\nThe security analyst tried the same technique for `C:\\proc\\sys\\net\\core\\somaxconn` with a lot of values to impact Netty but the only things that works is the \"larger than 1 GB file\" technique. https://github.com/netty/netty/blob/c0fdb8e9f8f256990e902fcfffbbe10754d0f3dd/common/src/main/java/io/netty/util/NetUtil.java#L186\n\n### Impact\n\nBy loading the \"file larger than 1 GB\" into the memory, the Netty library exceeds the JVM memory limit and causes a crash in the java Windows application.\n\nThis behaviour occurs 100% of the time in both Server mode and Client mode if the large file exists.\n\nClient mode :\n\n\u003cimg width=\"449\" alt=\"6\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f8fe1ed0-1a42-4490-b9ed-dbc9af7804be\"\u003e\n\nServer mode :\n\n\u003cimg width=\"464\" alt=\"7\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b34b42bd-4fbd-4170-b93a-d29ba87b88eb\"\u003e\n\nsomaxconn :\n\n\u003cimg width=\"532\" alt=\"8\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0656b3bb-32c6-4ae2-bff7-d93babba08a3\"\u003e\n\n### Severity\n\n- Attack vector : \"Local\" because the attacker needs to be on the system where the Netty application is running.\n- Attack complexity : \"Low\" because the attacker only need to create a massive file (regardless of its contents).\n- Privileges required : \"Low\" because the attacker requires a user account to exploit the vulnerability.\n- User intercation : \"None\" because the administrator don\u0027t need to accidentally click anywhere to trigger the vulnerability. Furthermore, the exploitation works with defaults windows/AD settings.\n- Scope : \"Unchanged\" because only Netty is affected by the vulnerability.\n- Confidentiality : \"None\" because no data is exposed through exploiting the vulnerability.\n- Integrity : \"None\" because the explotation of the vulnerability does not allow editing, deleting or adding data elsewhere.\n- Availability : \"High\" because the exploitation of this vulnerability crashes the entire java application.",
"id": "GHSA-xq3w-v528-46rv",
"modified": "2025-02-18T15:57:45Z",
"published": "2024-11-12T19:53:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-xq3w-v528-46rv"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47535"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/fbf7a704a82e7449b48bd0bbb679f5661c6d61a3"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Denial of Service attack on windows app using netty"
}
GHSA-XWMG-2G98-W7V9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-11 03:30 – Updated: 2025-09-19 21:31Connect2id Nimbus JOSE + JWT before 10.0.2 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a deeply nested JSON object supplied in a JWT claim set, because of uncontrolled recursion. NOTE: this is independent of the Gson 2.11.0 issue because the Connect2id product could have checked the JSON object nesting depth, regardless of what limits (if any) were imposed by Gson.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.nimbusds:nimbus-jose-jwt"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "9.38-rc1"
},
{
"fixed": "10.0.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.nimbusds:nimbus-jose-jwt"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "9.37.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-53864"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-674"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-07-11T16:43:40Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-11T03:16:03Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Connect2id Nimbus JOSE + JWT before 10.0.2 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a deeply nested JSON object supplied in a JWT claim set, because of uncontrolled recursion. NOTE: this is independent of the Gson 2.11.0 issue because the Connect2id product could have checked the JSON object nesting depth, regardless of what limits (if any) were imposed by Gson.",
"id": "GHSA-xwmg-2g98-w7v9",
"modified": "2025-09-19T21:31:45Z",
"published": "2025-07-11T03:30:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-53864"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/google/gson/commit/1039427ff0100293dd3cf967a53a55282c0fef6b"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://bitbucket.org/connect2id/nimbus-jose-jwt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bitbucket.org/connect2id/nimbus-jose-jwt/commits/f7fb882cc08f027c9ceb874acec3b51c6222861c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bitbucket.org/connect2id/nimbus-jose-jwt/issues/583/stackoverflowerror-due-to-deeply-nested"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bitbucket.org/connect2id/nimbus-jose-jwt/issues/593/back-port-cve-2025-53864-fix-to-9x-branch"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/google/gson/compare/gson-parent-2.11.0...gson-parent-2.12.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Nimbus JOSE + JWT is vulnerable to DoS attacks when processing deeply nested JSON"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.