Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0781
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2024-09-16 - Updated: 2024-10-15
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Juniper Networks. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juniper Networks | Junos OS Evolved | Junos OS Evolved versions antérieures à 20.4R3-S7-EVO, 21.2R3-S7-EVO, 21.2R3-S8-EVO, 21.3R3-S5-EVO, 21.4R3-S5-EVO, 21.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.1R3-S4-EVO, 22.1R3-S5-EVO, 22.2R3-EVO, 22.2R3-S2-EVO, 22.2R3-S3-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R2-EVO, 22.3R2-S2-EVO, 22.3R3-S1-EVO, 22.3R3-S2-EVO, 22.3R3-S3-EVO, 22.4R2-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO, 22.4R3-S1-EVO, 22.4R3-S2-EVO, 23.2R1-EVO, 23.2R1-S2-EVO, 23.2R2-EVO, 23.2R2-S1-EVO, 23.4R1-EVO, 23.4R1-S1-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO et 24.2R1-EVO | ||
| Juniper Networks | Junos OS | Junos OS versions antérieures à 20.4R3-S9, 21.2R3-S6, 21.2R3-S7, 21.2R3-S8, 21.3R3-S5, 21.4R3-S4, 21.4R3-S5, 21.4R3-S7, 22.1R3-S3, 22.1R3-S4, 22.1R3-S5, 22.2R3-S2, 22.2R3-S3, 22.2R3-S4, 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3, 22.3R3-S1, 22.3R3-S2, 22.3R3-S3, 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3, 22.4R3-S2, 23.2R1-S1, 23.2R1-S2, 23.2R2, 23.4R1, 23.4R1-S1, 23.4R2 et 24.2R1 | ||
| Juniper Networks | BBE Cloud Setup | BBE Cloudsetup versions antérieures à 2.1.0 |
References
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Junos OS Evolved versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 20.4R3-S7-EVO, 21.2R3-S7-EVO, 21.2R3-S8-EVO, 21.3R3-S5-EVO, 21.4R3-S5-EVO, 21.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.1R3-S4-EVO, 22.1R3-S5-EVO, 22.2R3-EVO, 22.2R3-S2-EVO, 22.2R3-S3-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R2-EVO, 22.3R2-S2-EVO, 22.3R3-S1-EVO, 22.3R3-S2-EVO, 22.3R3-S3-EVO, 22.4R2-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO, 22.4R3-S1-EVO, 22.4R3-S2-EVO, 23.2R1-EVO, 23.2R1-S2-EVO, 23.2R2-EVO, 23.2R2-S1-EVO, 23.4R1-EVO, 23.4R1-S1-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO et 24.2R1-EVO",
"product": {
"name": "Junos OS Evolved",
"vendor": {
"name": "Juniper Networks",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Junos OS versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 20.4R3-S9, 21.2R3-S6, 21.2R3-S7, 21.2R3-S8, 21.3R3-S5, 21.4R3-S4, 21.4R3-S5, 21.4R3-S7, 22.1R3-S3, 22.1R3-S4, 22.1R3-S5, 22.2R3-S2, 22.2R3-S3, 22.2R3-S4, 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3, 22.3R3-S1, 22.3R3-S2, 22.3R3-S3, 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3, 22.4R3-S2, 23.2R1-S1, 23.2R1-S2, 23.2R2, 23.4R1, 23.4R1-S1, 23.4R2 et 24.2R1",
"product": {
"name": "Junos OS",
"vendor": {
"name": "Juniper Networks",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "BBE Cloudsetup versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 2.1.0",
"product": {
"name": "BBE Cloud Setup",
"vendor": {
"name": "Juniper Networks",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-15861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-5621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-2310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-2310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-15862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2007-5846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2007-5846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-8100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-25746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2008-6123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-6123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-25748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-2285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-2285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39522",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39522"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-6151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-6151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-3565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-3565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-25745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-18065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-18065"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-16T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-10-15T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0781",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-09-16T00:00:00.000000"
},
{
"description": "Correction d\u0027identifiants CVE erron\u00e9s",
"revision_date": "2024-10-15T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits Juniper Networks. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits Juniper Networks",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Juniper Networks JSA75756",
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2024-04-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-and-Junos-OS-Evolved-A-low-privileged-user-can-access-confidential-information-CVE-2024-21615"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Juniper Networks JSA82975",
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2024-07-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-Evolved-Multiple-CLI-parameter-processing-issues-allowing-privilege-escalation-resolved"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Juniper Networks JSA82977",
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2024-07-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-Evolved-User-is-not-logged-out-when-the-console-cable-is-disconnected-CVE-2024-39512"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Juniper Networks JSA82971",
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2024-07-Security-Bulletin-BBE-Cloudsetup-Multiple-vulnerabilities-resolved-in-2-1-0-release"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Juniper Networks JSA79175",
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2024-07-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-and-Junos-OS-Evolved-Upon-processing-specific-L2-traffic-rpd-can-hang-in-devices-with-EVPN-VXLAN-configured-CVE-2024-39517"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Juniper Networks JSA82974",
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2024-07-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-Evolved-Multiple-vulnerabilities-resolved-in-OpenSSL-3-0-12"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Juniper Networks JSA75746",
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2024-04-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-SRX-300-Series-Specific-link-local-traffic-causes-a-control-plane-overload-CVE-2024-21605"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Juniper Networks JSA75759",
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2024-04-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-and-Junos-OS-Evolved-When-LLDP-is-enabled-and-a-malformed-LLDP-packet-is-received-l2cpd-crashes-CVE-2024-21618"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Juniper Networks JSA75750",
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2024-04-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-MX-Series-with-SPC3-and-SRX-Series-If-specific-IPsec-parameters-are-negotiated-iked-will-crash-due-to-a-memory-leak-CVE-2024-21609"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Juniper Networks JSA79101",
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2024-07-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-Evolved-Receipt-of-arbitrary-data-when-sampling-service-is-enabled-leads-to-partial-Denial-of-Service-DoS-CVE-2024-39553"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Juniper Networks JSA82973",
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2024-07-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-and-Junos-OS-Evolved-Multiple-vulnerabilities-resolved-in-net-SNMP-5-9-4"
}
]
}
CVE-2023-33953 (GCVE-0-2023-33953)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-08-09 12:54 – Updated: 2024-09-27 18:40
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Denial-of-Service in gRPC
Summary
gRPC contains a vulnerability that allows hpack table accounting errors could lead to unwanted disconnects between clients and servers in exceptional cases/ Three vectors were found that allow the following DOS attacks:
- Unbounded memory buffering in the HPACK parser
- Unbounded CPU consumption in the HPACK parser
The unbounded CPU consumption is down to a copy that occurred per-input-block in the parser, and because that could be unbounded due to the memory copy bug we end up with an O(n^2) parsing loop, with n selected by the client.
The unbounded memory buffering bugs:
- The header size limit check was behind the string reading code, so we needed to first buffer up to a 4 gigabyte string before rejecting it as longer than 8 or 16kb.
- HPACK varints have an encoding quirk whereby an infinite number of 0’s can be added at the start of an integer. gRPC’s hpack parser needed to read all of them before concluding a parse.
- gRPC’s metadata overflow check was performed per frame, so that the following sequence of frames could cause infinite buffering: HEADERS: containing a: 1 CONTINUATION: containing a: 2 CONTINUATION: containing a: 3 etc…
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T15:54:14.192Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://cloud.google.com/support/bulletins#gcp-2023-022"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:grpc:grpc:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "grpc",
"vendor": "grpc",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.53.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "154.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.54",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.55.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.55",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.56.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.56",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-33953",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-27T17:54:21.539206Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-27T18:40:52.297Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "gRPC",
"vendor": "Google",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.56.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "gRPC contains a vulnerability that allows hpack table accounting errors could lead to unwanted disconnects between clients and servers in exceptional cases/\u0026nbsp;Three vectors were found that allow the following DOS attacks:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e- Unbounded memory buffering in the HPACK parser\u003cbr\u003e- Unbounded CPU consumption in the HPACK parser\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe unbounded CPU consumption is down to a copy that occurred per-input-block in the parser, and because that could be unbounded due to the memory copy bug we end up with an O(n^2) parsing loop, with n selected by the client.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe unbounded memory buffering bugs:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e- The header size limit check was behind the string reading code, so we needed to first buffer up to a 4 gigabyte string before rejecting it as longer than 8 or 16kb.\u003cbr\u003e- HPACK varints have an encoding quirk whereby an infinite number of 0\u2019s can be added at the start of an integer. gRPC\u2019s hpack parser needed to read all of them before concluding a parse.\u003cbr\u003e- gRPC\u2019s metadata overflow check was performed per frame, so that the following sequence of frames could cause infinite buffering: HEADERS: containing a: 1 CONTINUATION: containing a: 2 CONTINUATION: containing a: 3 etc\u2026"
}
],
"value": "gRPC contains a vulnerability that allows hpack table accounting errors could lead to unwanted disconnects between clients and servers in exceptional cases/\u00a0Three vectors were found that allow the following DOS attacks:\n\n- Unbounded memory buffering in the HPACK parser\n- Unbounded CPU consumption in the HPACK parser\n\nThe unbounded CPU consumption is down to a copy that occurred per-input-block in the parser, and because that could be unbounded due to the memory copy bug we end up with an O(n^2) parsing loop, with n selected by the client.\n\nThe unbounded memory buffering bugs:\n\n- The header size limit check was behind the string reading code, so we needed to first buffer up to a 4 gigabyte string before rejecting it as longer than 8 or 16kb.\n- HPACK varints have an encoding quirk whereby an infinite number of 0\u2019s can be added at the start of an integer. gRPC\u2019s hpack parser needed to read all of them before concluding a parse.\n- gRPC\u2019s metadata overflow check was performed per frame, so that the following sequence of frames could cause infinite buffering: HEADERS: containing a: 1 CONTINUATION: containing a: 2 CONTINUATION: containing a: 3 etc\u2026"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-220",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-220 Client-Server Protocol Manipulation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-834",
"description": "CWE-834 Excessive Iteration",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-789",
"description": "CWE-789 Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-08-09T12:54:47.415Z",
"orgId": "14ed7db2-1595-443d-9d34-6215bf890778",
"shortName": "Google"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cloud.google.com/support/bulletins#gcp-2023-022"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Denial-of-Service in gRPC",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "14ed7db2-1595-443d-9d34-6215bf890778",
"assignerShortName": "Google",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-33953",
"datePublished": "2023-08-09T12:54:47.415Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-05-24T12:08:31.409Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-27T18:40:52.297Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-3446 (GCVE-0-2023-3446)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-07-19 11:31 – Updated: 2025-04-23 16:20
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Excessive time spent checking DH keys and parameters
Summary
Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.
Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()
or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long
delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained
from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.
The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those
checks confirms that the modulus ('p' parameter) is not too large. Trying to use
a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which
is over 10,000 bits in length.
However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters
that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value
even if it has already been found to be too large.
An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained
from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.
The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.
An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.
The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and
EVP_PKEY_param_check().
Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications
when using the '-check' option.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Assigner
References
13 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txt | vendor-advisory |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/4 | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/5 | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/6 | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/31/1 | x_transferred |
| https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-2023080… | x_transferred |
| https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023… | x_transferred |
| https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08 | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/16/1 | x_transferred |
Impacted products
Date Public
2023-07-13 00:00
Credits
OSSfuzz
Matt Caswell
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T06:55:03.577Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23"
},
{
"name": "3.0.10 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1fa20cf2f506113c761777127a38bce5068740eb"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1v git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8780a896543a654e757db1b9396383f9d8095528"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zi patch (premium)",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a0a4d3c1e7138915563c0df4fe6a3f9377b839c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/4"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/5"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/6"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/31/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230803-0011/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/08/msg00019.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/16/1"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-3446",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:26:22.087194Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T16:20:00.400Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1v",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zi",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "OSSfuzz"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Matt Caswell"
}
],
"datePublic": "2023-07-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\u003cbr\u003eor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\u003cbr\u003edelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\u003cbr\u003efrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\u003cbr\u003echecks confirms that the modulus (\u0027p\u0027 parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\u003cbr\u003ea very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\u003cbr\u003eis over 10,000 bits in length.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\u003cbr\u003ethat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\u003cbr\u003eeven if it has already been found to be too large.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\u003cbr\u003efrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\u003cbr\u003eAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\u003cbr\u003eThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\u003cbr\u003eEVP_PKEY_param_check().\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\u003cbr\u003ewhen using the \u0027-check\u0027 option.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\nor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\ndelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\nfrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\n\nThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\nchecks confirms that the modulus (\u0027p\u0027 parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\na very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\nis over 10,000 bits in length.\n\nHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\nthat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\neven if it has already been found to be too large.\n\nAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\nfrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\n\nThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\nAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\nThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\nEVP_PKEY_param_check().\n\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the \u0027-check\u0027 option.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:47.238Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23"
},
{
"name": "3.0.10 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1fa20cf2f506113c761777127a38bce5068740eb"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1v git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8780a896543a654e757db1b9396383f9d8095528"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zi patch (premium)",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a0a4d3c1e7138915563c0df4fe6a3f9377b839c"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Excessive time spent checking DH keys and parameters",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-3446",
"datePublished": "2023-07-19T11:31:34.994Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-06-28T14:21:39.968Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T16:20:00.400Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-3817 (GCVE-0-2023-3817)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-07-31 15:34 – Updated: 2025-05-05 15:53
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Excessive time spent checking DH q parameter value
Summary
Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.
Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()
or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long
delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained
from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.
The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. After fixing
CVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter value can also trigger
an overly long computation during some of these checks. A correct q value,
if present, cannot be larger than the modulus p parameter, thus it is
unnecessary to perform these checks if q is larger than p.
An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained
from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.
The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.
An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.
The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and
EVP_PKEY_param_check().
Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications
when using the "-check" option.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Assigner
References
15 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230731.txt | vendor-advisory |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Jul/43 | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/31/1 | x_transferred |
| https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023… | x_transferred |
| https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-2023081… | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/22/9 | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/0… | x_transferred |
| https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-2023102… | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/11/06/2 | x_transferred |
| https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08 | x_transferred |
| https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-2024062… | x_transferred |
Impacted products
Date Public
2023-07-31 00:00
Credits
Bernd Edlinger
Tomas Mraz
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T07:08:50.496Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230731.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=6a1eb62c29db6cb5eec707f9338aee00f44e26f5"
},
{
"name": "3.0.10 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9002fd07327a91f35ba6c1307e71fa6fd4409b7f"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1v git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=91ddeba0f2269b017dc06c46c993a788974b1aa5"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zi patch (premium)",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=869ad69aadd985c7b8ca6f4e5dd0eb274c9f3644"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Jul/43"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/31/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/08/msg00019.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230818-0014/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/22/9"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/22/11"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231027-0008/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/11/06/2"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-3817",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:26:20.624850Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T15:53:49.014Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1v",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zi",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Bernd Edlinger"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Tomas Mraz"
}
],
"datePublic": "2023-07-31T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\u003cbr\u003eor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\u003cbr\u003edelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\u003cbr\u003efrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. After fixing\u003cbr\u003eCVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter value can also trigger\u003cbr\u003ean overly long computation during some of these checks. A correct q value,\u003cbr\u003eif present, cannot be larger than the modulus p parameter, thus it is\u003cbr\u003eunnecessary to perform these checks if q is larger than p.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\u003cbr\u003efrom an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\u003cbr\u003eAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\u003cbr\u003eThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\u003cbr\u003eEVP_PKEY_param_check().\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\u003cbr\u003ewhen using the \"-check\" option.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\nor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\ndelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\nfrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\n\nThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. After fixing\nCVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter value can also trigger\nan overly long computation during some of these checks. A correct q value,\nif present, cannot be larger than the modulus p parameter, thus it is\nunnecessary to perform these checks if q is larger than p.\n\nAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\nfrom an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\n\nThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\nAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\nThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\nEVP_PKEY_param_check().\n\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the \"-check\" option.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\n\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:48.907Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230731.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=6a1eb62c29db6cb5eec707f9338aee00f44e26f5"
},
{
"name": "3.0.10 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9002fd07327a91f35ba6c1307e71fa6fd4409b7f"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1v git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=91ddeba0f2269b017dc06c46c993a788974b1aa5"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zi patch (premium)",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=869ad69aadd985c7b8ca6f4e5dd0eb274c9f3644"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Excessive time spent checking DH q parameter value",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-3817",
"datePublished": "2023-07-31T15:34:13.627Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-07-21T08:47:25.638Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T15:53:49.014Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-4785 (GCVE-0-2023-4785)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-09-13 16:31 – Updated: 2026-01-12 15:34
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Denial of Service in gRPC Core
Summary
Lack of error handling in the TCP server in Google's gRPC starting version 1.23 on posix-compatible platforms (ex. Linux) allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by initiating a significant number of connections with the server. Note that gRPC C++ Python, and Ruby are affected, but gRPC Java, and Go are NOT affected.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| gRPC |
Unaffected:
0 , < 1.23
(custom)
Unaffected: 1.57 Affected: 1.56.0 , ≤ 1.56.1 (custom) Affected: 1.55.0 , ≤ 1.55.2 (custom) Affected: 1.54.0 , ≤ 1.54.2 (custom) Affected: 1.53.0 , ≤ 1.53.1 (custom) |
||
| grpc | grpc |
Affected:
0 , < 1.23
(custom)
Affected: 1.57 Affected: 1.56.0 , ≤ 1.56.1 (custom) Affected: 1.55.0 , ≤ 155.2 (custom) Affected: 1.54.0 , ≤ 1.54.2 (custom) Affected: 1.53.0 , ≤ 1.53.1 (custom) cpe:2.3:a:grpc:grpc:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T07:38:00.495Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33656"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33667"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33669"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33670"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33672"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:grpc:grpc:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "grpc",
"vendor": "grpc",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.23",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.57"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.56.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.56.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "155.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.55.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.54.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.54.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.53.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.53.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-4785",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-25T18:02:01.004344Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-25T18:05:52.337Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Posix-compatible platforms"
],
"product": "gRPC",
"repo": "https://github.com/grpc/grpc",
"vendor": "Google",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.23",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1.57"
},
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "1.56.2",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.56.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.56.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "1.55.3",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.55.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.55.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "1.54.3",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.54.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.54.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "1.53.2",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.53.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.53.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Lack of error handling in the TCP server in Google\u0027s gRPC starting version 1.23 on posix-compatible platforms (ex. Linux) allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by initiating a significant number of connections with the server. Note that gRPC C++ Python, and Ruby are affected, but gRPC Java, and Go are NOT affected.\u0026nbsp;"
}
],
"value": "Lack of error handling in the TCP server in Google\u0027s gRPC starting version 1.23 on posix-compatible platforms (ex. Linux) allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by initiating a significant number of connections with the server. Note that gRPC C++ Python, and Ruby are affected, but gRPC Java, and Go are NOT affected."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-125",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-125 Flooding"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-248",
"description": "CWE-248",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-12T15:34:12.725Z",
"orgId": "14ed7db2-1595-443d-9d34-6215bf890778",
"shortName": "Google"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33656"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33667"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33669"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33670"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33672"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Denial of Service in gRPC Core",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "14ed7db2-1595-443d-9d34-6215bf890778",
"assignerShortName": "Google",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-4785",
"datePublished": "2023-09-13T16:31:55.664Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-09-06T04:50:57.530Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-12T15:34:12.725Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2023-4807 (GCVE-0-2023-4807)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-09-08 11:01 – Updated: 2025-08-27 20:42
VLAI
EPSS
Title
POLY1305 MAC implementation corrupts XMM registers on Windows
Summary
Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation
contains a bug that might corrupt the internal state of applications on the
Windows 64 platform when running on newer X86_64 processors supporting the
AVX512-IFMA instructions.
Impact summary: If in an application that uses the OpenSSL library an attacker
can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is used, the application
state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences.
The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL does
not save the contents of non-volatile XMM registers on Windows 64 platform
when calculating the MAC of data larger than 64 bytes. Before returning to
the caller all the XMM registers are set to zero rather than restoring their
previous content. The vulnerable code is used only on newer x86_64 processors
supporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions.
The consequences of this kind of internal application state corruption can
be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not
depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst
consequences, where the attacker could get complete control of the application
process. However given the contents of the registers are just zeroized so
the attacker cannot put arbitrary values inside, the most likely consequence,
if any, would be an incorrect result of some application dependent
calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service.
The POLY1305 MAC algorithm is most frequently used as part of the
CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated data)
algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol
versions 1.2 and 1.3 and a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD
cipher is used by the server. This implies that server applications using
OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are currently not aware of
any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we
consider this a Low severity security issue.
As a workaround the AVX512-IFMA instructions support can be disabled at
runtime by setting the environment variable OPENSSL_ia32cap:
OPENSSL_ia32cap=:~0x200000
The FIPS provider is not affected by this issue.
Severity
7.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-440 - Expected Behavior Violation
Assigner
References
5 references
Impacted products
Date Public
2023-09-08 00:00
Credits
Zach Wilson
Bernd Edlinger
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T07:38:00.793Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230908.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=4bfac4471f53c4f74c8d81020beb938f92d84ca5"
},
{
"name": "3.0.11 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=6754de4a121ec7f261b16723180df6592cbb4508"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1w git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=a632d534c73eeb3e3db8c7540d811194ef7c79ff"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230921-0001/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-4807",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:27:06.574022Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-27T20:42:52.433Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1w",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Zach Wilson"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Bernd Edlinger"
}
],
"datePublic": "2023-09-08T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation\u003cbr\u003econtains a bug that might corrupt the internal state of applications on the\u003cbr\u003eWindows 64 platform when running on newer X86_64 processors supporting the\u003cbr\u003eAVX512-IFMA instructions.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: If in an application that uses the OpenSSL library an attacker\u003cbr\u003ecan influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is used, the application\u003cbr\u003estate might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL does\u003cbr\u003enot save the contents of non-volatile XMM registers on Windows 64 platform\u003cbr\u003ewhen calculating the MAC of data larger than 64 bytes. Before returning to\u003cbr\u003ethe caller all the XMM registers are set to zero rather than restoring their\u003cbr\u003eprevious content. The vulnerable code is used only on newer x86_64 processors\u003cbr\u003esupporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe consequences of this kind of internal application state corruption can\u003cbr\u003ebe various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not\u003cbr\u003edepend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst\u003cbr\u003econsequences, where the attacker could get complete control of the application\u003cbr\u003eprocess. However given the contents of the registers are just zeroized so\u003cbr\u003ethe attacker cannot put arbitrary values inside, the most likely consequence,\u003cbr\u003eif any, would be an incorrect result of some application dependent\u003cbr\u003ecalculations or a crash leading to a denial of service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe POLY1305 MAC algorithm is most frequently used as part of the\u003cbr\u003eCHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated data)\u003cbr\u003ealgorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol\u003cbr\u003eversions 1.2 and 1.3 and a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD\u003cbr\u003ecipher is used by the server. This implies that server applications using\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are currently not aware of\u003cbr\u003eany concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we\u003cbr\u003econsider this a Low severity security issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAs a workaround the AVX512-IFMA instructions support can be disabled at\u003cbr\u003eruntime by setting the environment variable OPENSSL_ia32cap:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e OPENSSL_ia32cap=:~0x200000\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS provider is not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation\ncontains a bug that might corrupt the internal state of applications on the\nWindows 64 platform when running on newer X86_64 processors supporting the\nAVX512-IFMA instructions.\n\nImpact summary: If in an application that uses the OpenSSL library an attacker\ncan influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is used, the application\nstate might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences.\n\nThe POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL does\nnot save the contents of non-volatile XMM registers on Windows 64 platform\nwhen calculating the MAC of data larger than 64 bytes. Before returning to\nthe caller all the XMM registers are set to zero rather than restoring their\nprevious content. The vulnerable code is used only on newer x86_64 processors\nsupporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions.\n\nThe consequences of this kind of internal application state corruption can\nbe various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not\ndepend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst\nconsequences, where the attacker could get complete control of the application\nprocess. However given the contents of the registers are just zeroized so\nthe attacker cannot put arbitrary values inside, the most likely consequence,\nif any, would be an incorrect result of some application dependent\ncalculations or a crash leading to a denial of service.\n\nThe POLY1305 MAC algorithm is most frequently used as part of the\nCHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated data)\nalgorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol\nversions 1.2 and 1.3 and a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD\ncipher is used by the server. This implies that server applications using\nOpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are currently not aware of\nany concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we\nconsider this a Low severity security issue.\n\nAs a workaround the AVX512-IFMA instructions support can be disabled at\nruntime by setting the environment variable OPENSSL_ia32cap:\n\n OPENSSL_ia32cap=:~0x200000\n\nThe FIPS provider is not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-440",
"description": "CWE-440 Expected Behavior Violation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:50.502Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230908.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=4bfac4471f53c4f74c8d81020beb938f92d84ca5"
},
{
"name": "3.0.11 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=6754de4a121ec7f261b16723180df6592cbb4508"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1w git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=a632d534c73eeb3e3db8c7540d811194ef7c79ff"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "POLY1305 MAC implementation corrupts XMM registers on Windows",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-4807",
"datePublished": "2023-09-08T11:01:53.663Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-09-06T16:32:29.871Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-27T20:42:52.433Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-5043 (GCVE-0-2023-5043)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-10-25 19:18 – Updated: 2025-02-13 17:19
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Ingress nginx annotation injection causes arbitrary command execution
Summary
Ingress nginx annotation injection causes arbitrary command execution.
Severity
7.6 (High)
CWE
- CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation
Assigner
References
4 references
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kubernetes | ingress-nginx |
Affected:
0 , < 1.9.0
(semver)
Unknown: 1.9.0 |
Date Public
2023-10-25 16:30
Credits
suanve
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T07:44:53.863Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/issues/10571"
},
{
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/kubernetes-security-announce/c/pVsXsOpxYZo"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/25/4"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240307-0012/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "ingress-nginx",
"repo": "https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx",
"vendor": "Kubernetes",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.9.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unknown",
"version": "1.9.0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "suanve"
}
],
"datePublic": "2023-10-25T16:30:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Ingress nginx annotation injection causes arbitrary command execution.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Ingress nginx annotation injection causes arbitrary command execution."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-233",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-233 Privilege Escalation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"description": "CWE-20: Improper Input Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-03-07T17:06:13.687Z",
"orgId": "a6081bf6-c852-4425-ad4f-a67919267565",
"shortName": "kubernetes"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/issues/10571"
},
{
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/kubernetes-security-announce/c/pVsXsOpxYZo"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/25/4"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240307-0012/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Ingress nginx annotation injection causes arbitrary command execution",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a6081bf6-c852-4425-ad4f-a67919267565",
"assignerShortName": "kubernetes",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-5043",
"datePublished": "2023-10-25T19:18:57.704Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-09-18T13:11:42.508Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-13T17:19:26.664Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-5363 (GCVE-0-2023-5363)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-10-24 15:31 – Updated: 2026-05-12 10:22
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Incorrect cipher key & IV length processing
Summary
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and
initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation
or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness,
which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or
EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after
the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length,
via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter,
within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially
causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers
and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in
loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D
section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in
GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will
produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory
exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security
critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation
and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that
application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since
decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly
vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being
vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then
this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this
issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because
the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-684 - Incorrect Provision of Specified Functionality
Assigner
References
14 references
Impacted products
6 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL |
Affected:
3.0.0 , < 3.0.12
(semver)
Affected: 3.1.0 , < 3.1.4 (semver) |
|
| Siemens | SIDIS Prime |
Affected:
0 , < V4.0.700
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.5 , < *
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.5 , < *
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.5 , < *
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SINEC NMS |
Affected:
0 , < V3.0 SP1
(custom)
|
Date Public
2023-10-24 00:00
Credits
Tony Battersby (Cybernetics)
Dr Paul Dale
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T21:50:37.158Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20231024.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=5f69f5c65e483928c4b28ed16af6e5742929f1ee"
},
{
"name": "3.0.12 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0df40630850fb2740e6be6890bb905d3fc623b2d"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/24/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5532"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231027-0010/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240201-0003/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240201-0004/"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241108-0002/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-5363",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-03T19:15:36.625641Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T19:49:14.914Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIDIS Prime",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V4.0.700",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SINEC NMS",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.0 SP1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T10:22:25.646Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-093430.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-331112.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-769027.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-277137.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-082556.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.0.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Tony Battersby (Cybernetics)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Dr Paul Dale"
}
],
"datePublic": "2023-10-24T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and\u003cbr\u003einitialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation\u003cbr\u003eor overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness,\u003cbr\u003ewhich could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhen calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or\u003cbr\u003eEVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after\u003cbr\u003ethe key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length,\u003cbr\u003evia the \"keylen\" parameter or the IV length, via the \"ivlen\" parameter,\u003cbr\u003ewithin the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially\u003cbr\u003ecausing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers\u003cbr\u003eand cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in\u003cbr\u003eloss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST\u0027s SP 800-38D\u003cbr\u003esection 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in\u003cbr\u003eGCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eBoth truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will\u003cbr\u003eproduce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory\u003cbr\u003eexception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security\u003cbr\u003ecritical.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eChanging the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation\u003cbr\u003eand the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that\u003cbr\u003eapplication developers will have spotted this problem during testing since\u003cbr\u003edecryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly\u003cbr\u003evulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being\u003cbr\u003evulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then\u003cbr\u003ethis issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this\u003cbr\u003eissue as Moderate severity overall.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because\u003cbr\u003ethe issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and\ninitialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation\nor overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.\n\nImpact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness,\nwhich could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.\n\nWhen calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or\nEVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after\nthe key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length,\nvia the \"keylen\" parameter or the IV length, via the \"ivlen\" parameter,\nwithin the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially\ncausing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers\nand cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.\n\nFor the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in\nloss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST\u0027s SP 800-38D\nsection 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in\nGCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.\n\nBoth truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will\nproduce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory\nexception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security\ncritical.\n\nChanging the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation\nand the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that\napplication developers will have spotted this problem during testing since\ndecryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly\nvulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being\nvulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then\nthis issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this\nissue as Moderate severity overall.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\n\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because\nthe issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.\n\nOpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "MODERATE"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-684",
"description": "CWE-684 Incorrect Provision of Specified Functionality",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:52.132Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20231024.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=5f69f5c65e483928c4b28ed16af6e5742929f1ee"
},
{
"name": "3.0.12 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0df40630850fb2740e6be6890bb905d3fc623b2d"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Incorrect cipher key \u0026 IV length processing",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-5363",
"datePublished": "2023-10-24T15:31:40.890Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-10-03T16:19:46.060Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T10:22:25.646Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-21605 (GCVE-0-2024-21605)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-04-12 14:54 – Updated: 2024-08-09 20:09
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Junos OS: SRX 300 Series: Specific link local traffic causes a control plane overload
Summary
An Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX 300 Series allows an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).
Specific valid link-local traffic is not blocked on ports in STP blocked state but is instead sent to the control plane of the device. This leads to excessive resource consumption and in turn severe impact on all control and management protocols of the device.
This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS:
* 21.2 version 21.2R3-S3 and later versions earlier than 21.2R3-S6;
* 22.1 version 22.1R3 and later versions earlier than 22.1R3-S4;
* 22.2 version
22.2R2
and later versions earlier than 22.2R3-S2;
* 22.3 version
22.3R2
and later versions earlier than 22.3R3-S1;
* 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3;
* 23.2 versions earlier than 23.2R1-S1, 23.2R2.
This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS 21.4R1 and later versions of 21.4.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-668 - Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere
- Denial of Service
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA75746 | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.… | technical-description |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juniper Networks | Junos OS |
Affected:
21.2R3-S3 , < 21.2R3-S6
(semver)
Affected: 22.1R3 , < 22.1R3-S4 (semver) Affected: 22.2R2 , < 22.2R3-S2 (semver) Affected: 22.3R2 , < 22.3R3-S1 (semver) Affected: 22.4 , < 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3 (semver) Affected: 23.2 , < 23.2R1-S1, 23.2R2 (semver) Unaffected: 21.4 , < 21.4* (semver) |
Date Public
2024-04-10 16:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T22:27:35.771Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA75746"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-21605",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-08-09T20:09:17.730960Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-09T20:09:26.830Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"SRX 300 Series"
],
"product": "Junos OS",
"vendor": "Juniper Networks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "21.2R3-S6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "21.2R3-S3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.1R3-S4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.1R3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.2R3-S2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.2R2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.3R3-S1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.3R2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "23.2R1-S1, 23.2R2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "23.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "21.4*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "21.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "To be affected by this vulnerability at least two interfaces need to be configured with an STP:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp; [ protocols (stp | mstp | rstp | vstp) interface \u0026lt;interface\u0026gt; ]"
}
],
"value": "To be affected by this vulnerability at least two interfaces need to be configured with an STP:\n\n\u00a0 [ protocols (stp | mstp | rstp | vstp) interface \u003cinterface\u003e ]"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-04-10T16:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX 300 Series allows an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nSpecific valid link-local traffic is not blocked on ports in STP blocked state but is instead sent to the control plane of the device.\u0026nbsp;This leads to excessive resource consumption and in turn severe impact on all control and management protocols of the device.\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThis issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e21.2 version 21.2R3-S3 and later versions earlier than 21.2R3-S6;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e22.1 version 22.1R3 and later versions earlier than 22.1R3-S4;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e22.2 version \n\n22.2R2\n\nand later versions earlier than 22.2R3-S2;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e22.3 version \n\n22.3R2 \n\nand later versions earlier than 22.3R3-S1;\n\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e23.2 versions earlier than 23.2R1-S1, 23.2R2.\n\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\nThis issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS 21.4R1 and later versions of 21.4.\n\n"
}
],
"value": "An Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX 300 Series allows an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).\n\n\n\nSpecific valid link-local traffic is not blocked on ports in STP blocked state but is instead sent to the control plane of the device.\u00a0This leads to excessive resource consumption and in turn severe impact on all control and management protocols of the device.\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS:\n * 21.2 version 21.2R3-S3 and later versions earlier than 21.2R3-S6;\n * 22.1 version 22.1R3 and later versions earlier than 22.1R3-S4;\n * 22.2 version \n\n22.2R2\n\nand later versions earlier than 22.2R3-S2;\n * 22.3 version \n\n22.3R2 \n\nand later versions earlier than 22.3R3-S1;\n\n * 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3;\n * 23.2 versions earlier than 23.2R1-S1, 23.2R2.\n\n\n\n\nThis issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS 21.4R1 and later versions of 21.4."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eJuniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Juniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-668",
"description": "CWE-668 Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Denial of Service",
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-05-16T20:08:03.419Z",
"orgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
"shortName": "juniper"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA75746"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 21.2R3-S6, 22.1R3-S4, 22.2R3-S2, 22.3R3-S1, 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3, 23.2R1-S1, 23.2R2, 23.4R1, and all subsequent releases.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 21.2R3-S6, 22.1R3-S4, 22.2R3-S2, 22.3R3-S1, 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3, 23.2R1-S1, 23.2R2, 23.4R1, and all subsequent releases."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "JSA75746",
"defect": [
"1706933"
],
"discovery": "USER"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-04-10T16:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Initial Publication"
}
],
"title": "Junos OS: SRX 300 Series: Specific link local traffic causes a control plane overload",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThere are no known workarounds for this issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "There are no known workarounds for this issue."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-av217"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
"assignerShortName": "juniper",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-21605",
"datePublished": "2024-04-12T14:54:46.590Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-12-27T19:38:25.707Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-09T20:09:26.830Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-21609 (GCVE-0-2024-21609)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-04-12 14:55 – Updated: 2024-08-01 22:27
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Junos OS: MX Series with SPC3, and SRX Series: If specific IPsec parameters are negotiated iked will crash due to a memory leak
Summary
A Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the IKE daemon (iked) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with SPC3, and SRX Series allows an administratively adjacent attacker which is able to successfully establish IPsec tunnels to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).
If specific values for the IPsec parameters local-ip, remote-ip, remote ike-id, and traffic selectors are sent from the peer, a memory leak occurs during every IPsec SA rekey which is carried out with a specific message sequence. This will eventually result in an iked process crash and restart.
The iked process memory consumption can be checked using the below command:
user@host> show system processes extensive | grep iked
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
56903 root 31 0 4016M 2543M CPU0 0 2:10 10.50% iked
This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS:
* All versions earlier than 20.4R3-S9;
* 21.2 versions earlier than 21.2R3-S7;
* 21.3 versions earlier than 21.3R3-S5;
* 21.4 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S4;
* 22.1 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S3;
* 22.2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S2;
* 22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R3;
* 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R3;
* 23.2 versions earlier than 23.2R1-S2, 23.2R2.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-401 - Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime
- Denial of Service (DoS)
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| http://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA75750 | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.… | technical-description |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juniper Networks | Junos OS |
Affected:
0 , < 20.4R3-S9
(semver)
Affected: 21.2 , < 21.2R3-S7 (semver) Affected: 21.3 , < 21.3R3-S5 (semver) Affected: 21.4 , < 21.4R3-S4 (semver) Affected: 22.1 , < 22.1R3-S3 (semver) Affected: 22.2 , < 22.2R3-S2 (semver) Affected: 22.3 , < 22.3R3 (semver) Affected: 22.4 , < 22.4R3 (semver) Affected: 23.2 , < 23.2R1-S2, 23.2R2 (semver) |
Date Public
2024-04-10 16:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-21609",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-04-17T17:18:38.989630Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-07-03T16:41:11.676Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T22:27:35.671Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA75750"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"MX Series with SPC3",
"SRX Series"
],
"product": "Junos OS",
"vendor": "Juniper Networks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "20.4R3-S9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "21.2R3-S7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "21.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "21.3R3-S5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "21.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "21.4R3-S4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "21.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.1R3-S3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.2R3-S2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.3R3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.4R3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "23.2R1-S2, 23.2R2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "23.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eTo be exposed to this issue IPsec VPN needs to be configured with a minimal ike configuration:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; [ security ike gateway ike-policy ]\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; [ security ipsec vpn ike gateway ]\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eand the system needs to run iked (vs. kmd which is not affected), which can be verified with:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; show system processes extensive | match \"KMD|IKED\"\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "To be exposed to this issue IPsec VPN needs to be configured with a minimal ike configuration:\n\n\u00a0 [ security ike gateway ike-policy ]\n\n\u00a0 [ security ipsec vpn ike gateway ]\n\nand the system needs to run iked (vs. kmd which is not affected), which can be verified with:\n\n\u00a0 show system processes extensive | match \"KMD|IKED\""
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-04-10T16:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the IKE daemon (iked) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with SPC3, and SRX Series allows an administratively adjacent attacker which is able to successfully establish IPsec tunnels to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIf specific values for the IPsec parameters local-ip, remote-ip, remote ike-id, and traffic selectors are sent from the peer, a memory leak occurs during every IPsec SA rekey which is carried out with a specific message sequence. This will eventually result in an iked process crash and restart.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe iked process memory consumption can be checked using the below command:\u003cbr\u003e\u003ctt\u003e\u0026nbsp; user@host\u0026gt; show system processes extensive | grep iked\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; PID USERNAME \u0026nbsp; PRI NICE \u0026nbsp; SIZE \u0026nbsp; RES \u0026nbsp; STATE \u0026nbsp; C TIME WCPU COMMAND\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 56903 root \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 31 \u0026nbsp; 0 \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 4016M 2543M CPU0 \u0026nbsp; 0 2:10 10.50% iked\u003c/tt\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eAll versions earlier than 20.4R3-S9;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e21.2 versions earlier than 21.2R3-S7;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e21.3 versions earlier than 21.3R3-S5;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e21.4 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S4;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e22.1 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S3;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e22.2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S2;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R3;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R3;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e23.2 versions earlier than 23.2R1-S2, 23.2R2.\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the IKE daemon (iked) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with SPC3, and SRX Series allows an administratively adjacent attacker which is able to successfully establish IPsec tunnels to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).\n\nIf specific values for the IPsec parameters local-ip, remote-ip, remote ike-id, and traffic selectors are sent from the peer, a memory leak occurs during every IPsec SA rekey which is carried out with a specific message sequence. This will eventually result in an iked process crash and restart.\n\nThe iked process memory consumption can be checked using the below command:\n\u00a0 user@host\u003e show system processes extensive | grep iked\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 PID USERNAME \u00a0 PRI NICE \u00a0 SIZE \u00a0 RES \u00a0 STATE \u00a0 C TIME WCPU COMMAND\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 56903 root \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 31 \u00a0 0 \u00a0 \u00a0 4016M 2543M CPU0 \u00a0 0 2:10 10.50% iked\n\nThis issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS:\n * All versions earlier than 20.4R3-S9;\n * 21.2 versions earlier than 21.2R3-S7;\n * 21.3 versions earlier than 21.3R3-S5;\n * 21.4 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S4;\n * 22.1 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S3;\n * 22.2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S2;\n * 22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R3;\n * 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R3;\n * 23.2 versions earlier than 23.2R1-S2, 23.2R2."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eJuniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Juniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-401",
"description": "CWE-401 Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Denial of Service (DoS)",
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-05-16T20:09:32.000Z",
"orgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
"shortName": "juniper"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "http://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA75750"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 20.4R3-S9, 21.2R3-S7, 21.3R3-S5, 21.4R3-S4, 22.1R3-S3, 22.2R3-S2, 22.3R3, 22.4R3, 23.2R1-S2, 23.2R2, 23.4R1, and all subsequent releases.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 20.4R3-S9, 21.2R3-S7, 21.3R3-S5, 21.4R3-S4, 22.1R3-S3, 22.2R3-S2, 22.3R3, 22.4R3, 23.2R1-S2, 23.2R2, 23.4R1, and all subsequent releases."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "JSA75750",
"defect": [
"1718199"
],
"discovery": "USER"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-04-10T16:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Initial Publication"
}
],
"title": "Junos OS: MX Series with SPC3, and SRX Series: If specific IPsec parameters are negotiated iked will crash due to a memory leak",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eWhile there is no workaround available, customers can monitor the memory utilization and restart iked periodically to clear the leak.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "While there is no workaround available, customers can monitor the memory utilization and restart iked periodically to clear the leak."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-av217"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
"assignerShortName": "juniper",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-21609",
"datePublished": "2024-04-12T14:55:00.663Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-12-27T19:38:25.708Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T22:27:35.671Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-21615 (GCVE-0-2024-21615)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-04-12 14:55 – Updated: 2024-08-01 22:27
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: A low-privileged user can access confidential information
Summary
An Incorrect Default Permissions vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a local, low-privileged attacker to access confidential information on the system.
On all Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved platforms, when NETCONF traceoptions are configured, and a super-user performs specific actions via NETCONF, then a low-privileged user can access sensitive information compromising the confidentiality of the system.
This issue affects:
Junos OS:
* all versions before 21.2R3-S7,
* from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S5,
* from 22.1 before 22.1R3-S5,
* from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S3,
* from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S2,
* from 22.4 before 22.4R3,
* from 23.2 before 23.2R1-S2.
Junos OS Evolved:
* all versions before 21.2R3-S7-EVO,
* from 21.3 before 21.3R3-S5-EVO,
* from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S5-EVO,
* from 22.1 before 22.1R3-S5-EVO,
* from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S3-EVO,
* from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S2-EVO,
* from 22.4 before 22.4R3-EVO,
* from 23.2 before 23.2R1-S2.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-276 - Incorrect Default Permissions
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA75756 | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.… | technical-description |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juniper Networks | Junos OS |
Affected:
0 , < 21.2R3-S7
(semver)
Affected: 21.4 , < 21.4R3-S5 (semver) Affected: 22.1 , < 22.1R3-S5 (semver) Affected: 22.2 , < 22.2R3-S3 (semver) Affected: 22.3 , < 22.3R3-S2 (semver) Affected: 22.4 , < 22.4R3 (semver) Affected: 23.2 , < 23.2R1-S2 (semver) |
|
| Juniper Networks | Junos OS Evolved |
Affected:
0 , < 21.2R3-S7-EVO
(semver)
Affected: 21.3-EVO , < 21.3R3-S5-EVO (semver) Affected: 21.4-EVO , < 21.4R3-S5-EVO (semver) Affected: 22.1-EVO , < 22.1R3-S5-EVO (semver) Affected: 22.2-EVO , < 22.2R3-S3-EVO (semver) Affected: 22.3-EVO , < 22.3R3-S2-EVO (semver) Affected: 22.4-EVO , < 22.4R3-EVO (semver) Affected: 23.2-EVO , < 23.2R1-S2 (semver) |
Date Public
2024-04-10 17:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-21615",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-07-11T18:59:54.512566Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-07-11T19:00:00.978Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T22:27:35.780Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA75756"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Junos OS",
"vendor": "Juniper Networks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "21.2R3-S7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "21.4R3-S5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "21.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.1R3-S5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.2R3-S3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.3R3-S2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.4R3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "23.2R1-S2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "23.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Junos OS Evolved",
"vendor": "Juniper Networks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "21.2R3-S7-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "21.3R3-S5-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "21.3-EVO",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "21.4R3-S5-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "21.4-EVO",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.1R3-S5-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.1-EVO",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.2R3-S3-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.2-EVO",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.3R3-S2-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.3-EVO",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.4R3-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.4-EVO",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "23.2R1-S2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "23.2-EVO",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIn order for this issue to occur, netconf traceoptions needs to be enabled using the following configuration.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ctt\u003e\u0026nbsp; [system services netconf traceoptions]\u003c/tt\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In order for this issue to occur, netconf traceoptions needs to be enabled using the following configuration.\n\n\u00a0 [system services netconf traceoptions]"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-04-10T17:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An Incorrect Default Permissions vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a local, low-privileged attacker to access confidential information on the system.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOn all Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved platforms, when NETCONF traceoptions are configured, and a super-user performs specific actions via NETCONF, then a low-privileged user can access sensitive information compromising the confidentiality of the system.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eJunos OS:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eall versions before 21.2R3-S7,\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 21.4 before 21.4R3-S5,\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 22.1 before 22.1R3-S5,\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 22.2 before 22.2R3-S3,\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 22.3 before 22.3R3-S2,\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 22.4 before 22.4R3,\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 23.2 before 23.2R1-S2.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eJunos OS Evolved:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eall versions before 21.2R3-S7-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 21.3 before 21.3R3-S5-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 21.4 before 21.4R3-S5-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 22.1 before 22.1R3-S5-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 22.2 before 22.2R3-S3-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 22.3 before 22.3R3-S2-EVO,\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 22.4 before 22.4R3-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 23.2 before 23.2R1-S2.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An Incorrect Default Permissions vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a local, low-privileged attacker to access confidential information on the system.\n\nOn all Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved platforms, when NETCONF traceoptions are configured, and a super-user performs specific actions via NETCONF, then a low-privileged user can access sensitive information compromising the confidentiality of the system.\nThis issue affects:\n\nJunos OS:\n\n\n\n * all versions before 21.2R3-S7,\u00a0\n\n * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S5,\u00a0\n\n * from 22.1 before 22.1R3-S5,\u00a0\n\n * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S3,\u00a0\n\n * from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S2,\u00a0\n\n * from 22.4 before 22.4R3,\u00a0\n\n * from 23.2 before 23.2R1-S2.\n\n\n\n\n\nJunos OS Evolved:\u00a0\n\n\n\n * all versions before 21.2R3-S7-EVO,\u00a0\n\n * from 21.3 before 21.3R3-S5-EVO,\u00a0\n\n * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S5-EVO,\u00a0\n\n * from 22.1 before 22.1R3-S5-EVO,\u00a0\n\n * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S3-EVO,\u00a0\n\n * from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S2-EVO,\n\n * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-EVO,\u00a0\n\n * from 23.2 before 23.2R1-S2."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eJuniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Juniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-276",
"description": "CWE-276 Incorrect Default Permissions",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-05-16T20:11:17.641Z",
"orgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
"shortName": "juniper"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA75756"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eJunos OS: 21.2R3-S7, 21.4R3-S5, 22.1R3-S5, 22.2R3-S3, 22.3R3-S2, 22.4R3, 23.2R1-S2, 23.4R1 and all subsequent releases.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eJunos OS Evolved: 21.2R3-S7-EVO, 21.3R3-S5-EVO, 21.4R3-S5-EVO, 22.1R3-S5-EVO, 22.2R3-S3-EVO, 22.3R3-S2-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO, 23.2R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R1-EVO and all subsequent releases.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue:\n\nJunos OS: 21.2R3-S7, 21.4R3-S5, 22.1R3-S5, 22.2R3-S3, 22.3R3-S2, 22.4R3, 23.2R1-S2, 23.4R1 and all subsequent releases.\n\nJunos OS Evolved: 21.2R3-S7-EVO, 21.3R3-S5-EVO, 21.4R3-S5-EVO, 22.1R3-S5-EVO, 22.2R3-S3-EVO, 22.3R3-S2-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO, 23.2R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R1-EVO and all subsequent releases."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "JSA75756",
"defect": [
"1702241"
],
"discovery": "USER"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-04-10T17:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Initial Publication"
}
],
"title": "Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: A low-privileged user can access confidential information",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eTo reduce the risk of exploitation, enable access control lists (ACLs) and other filtering mechanisms to limit access to the device only from trusted hosts and networks to the NETCONF service.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "To reduce the risk of exploitation, enable access control lists (ACLs) and other filtering mechanisms to limit access to the device only from trusted hosts and networks to the NETCONF service."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-av217"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
"assignerShortName": "juniper",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-21615",
"datePublished": "2024-04-12T14:55:36.105Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-12-27T19:38:25.709Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T22:27:35.780Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Trend slope:
-
(linear fit over daily sighting counts)
Show additional events:
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…