CERTA-2013-AVI-249

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2013-04-17 - Updated: 2013-04-17

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans Oracle Industry Applications. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à l'intégrité des données et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Oracle N/A Oracle Clinical Remote Data Capture Option version 4.6.6
Oracle N/A Oracle Clinical Remote Data Capture Option version 4.6.0
References

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Oracle Clinical Remote Data Capture Option version 4.6.6",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Oracle",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Oracle Clinical Remote Data Capture Option version 4.6.0",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Oracle",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2013-2397",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-2397"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2013-1520",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-1520"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2013-1525",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-1525"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2013-04-17T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2013-04-17T00:00:00",
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2013-AVI-249",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2013-04-17T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
    },
    {
      "description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans \u003cspan\nclass=\"textit\"\u003eOracle Industry Applications\u003c/span\u003e. Elles permettent \u00e0\nun attaquant de provoquer une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une\natteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.\n",
  "title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Oracle Industry Applications",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Oracle CPUApr2013 du 16 avril 2013",
      "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuapr2013-1899555.html"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…