CERTA-2012-AVI-005
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2012-01-10 - Updated: 2012-01-10
Une vulnérabilité dans les imprimantes HP LaserJet P3015 permet à une personne malintentionnée d'accéder à des documents à distance et de façon non autorisée.
Description
Une vulnérabilité de type traversée de répertoires (directory traversal) est présente dans les imprimantes HP LaserJet P3015. Cette vulnérabilité est due à une erreur dans le serveur Web intégré à l'imprimante et peut être exploitée pour accéder au contenu de fichiers de façon non autorisée.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
HP LaserJet P3015 avec version du firmware inférieure à 07.080.3.
| Vendor | Product | Description |
|---|
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [],
"affected_systems_content": "\u003cP\u003e\u003cSPAN class=\"textit\"\u003eHP LaserJet P3015\u003c/SPAN\u003e avec version du \u003cSPAN class=\"textit\"\u003efirmware\u003c/SPAN\u003e inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 07.080.3.\u003c/P\u003e",
"content": "## Description\n\nUne vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 de type travers\u00e9e de r\u00e9pertoires (directory traversal)\nest pr\u00e9sente dans les imprimantes HP LaserJet P3015. Cette vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9\nest due \u00e0 une erreur dans le serveur Web int\u00e9gr\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u0027imprimante et peut\n\u00eatre exploit\u00e9e pour acc\u00e9der au contenu de fichiers de fa\u00e7on non\nautoris\u00e9e.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2011-4785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-4785"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2012-01-10T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2012-01-10T00:00:00",
"links": [
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 HP HPSBPI02733 SSRT100646 du 09 janvier 2012 :",
"url": "http://h20565.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay/?docId=emr_na-c03140700"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2012-AVI-005",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale ;",
"revision_date": "2012-01-10T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans les imprimantes \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eHP LaserJet\nP3015\u003c/span\u003e permet \u00e0 une personne malintentionn\u00e9e d\u0027acc\u00e9der \u00e0 des\ndocuments \u00e0 distance et de fa\u00e7on non autoris\u00e9e.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans les imprimantes HP LaserJet P3015",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 HP du 09 janvier 2012",
"url": null
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.