CERTA-2011-AVI-610

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2011-10-31 - Updated: 2011-10-31

Un défaut de configuration pouvant conduire à la divulgation de données de configuration a été découvert dans IBM Lotus Sametime.

Description

Le servlet de configuration de IBM Lotus Sametime ne requiert aucune authentification par défaut. Cela peut permettre à un utilisateur non privilégié d'obtenir un accès en lecture à des données de configuration.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
N/A N/A IBM Lotus Sametime 7.5, 7.5.1, 7.5.1.1, 7.5.1.2 ;
N/A N/A IBM Lotus Sametime 7.0 ;
N/A N/A IBM Lotus Sametime 8.5, 8.5.1, 8.5.1.1, 8.5.2.
N/A N/A IBM Lotus Sametime 8.0, 8.0.1, 8.0.2 ;

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "IBM Lotus Sametime 7.5, 7.5.1, 7.5.1.1, 7.5.1.2 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "IBM Lotus Sametime 7.0 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "IBM Lotus Sametime 8.5, 8.5.1, 8.5.1.1, 8.5.2.",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "IBM Lotus Sametime 8.0, 8.0.1, 8.0.2 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nLe servlet de configuration de IBM Lotus Sametime ne requiert aucune\nauthentification par d\u00e9faut. Cela peut permettre \u00e0 un utilisateur non\nprivil\u00e9gi\u00e9 d\u0027obtenir un acc\u00e8s en lecture \u00e0 des donn\u00e9es de configuration.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-1370",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1370"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2011-10-31T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2011-10-31T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM swg21569452 du 27 octobre 2011 :",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21569452"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2011-AVI-610",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2011-10-31T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Un d\u00e9faut de configuration pouvant conduire \u00e0 la divulgation de donn\u00e9es\nde configuration a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvert dans \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eIBM Lotus\nSametime\u003c/span\u003e.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans IBM Lotus Sametime",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 1469452 du 27 octobre 2011",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…