CERTA-2011-AVI-440

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2011-08-10 - Updated: 2011-08-10

Deux vulnérabilités dans la pile TCP/IP de Microsoft Windows permettent de réaliser un déni de service à distance.

Description

Deux failles ont été corrigées dans la pile TCP/IP de Microsoft Windows :

  • une vulnérabilité dans le traitement de messages ICMP permet à une personne malintentionnée de réaliser un déni de service à distance (CVE-2011-1871) ;
  • une vulnérabilité dans le traitement d'URL en mémoire, lorsque la qualité de service basée sur les URL est activée, permet à un attaquant distant d'effectuer un déni de service (CVE-2011-1965) ;

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Microsoft Windows Windows Vista Service Pack 2 ;
Microsoft Windows Windows Vista Édition x64 Service Pack 2 ;
Microsoft Windows Windows Server 2008 pour systèmes 32 bits Service Pack 2 ;
Microsoft Windows Windows Server 2008 R2 pour systèmes Itanium et Windows Server 2008 R2 pour systèmes Itanium Service Pack 1.
Microsoft Windows Windows 7 pour systèmes x64 et Windows 7 pour systèmes x64 Service Pack 1 ;
Microsoft Windows Windows Server 2008 R2 pour systèmes x64 et Windows Server 2008 R2 pour systèmes x64 Service Pack 1 ;
Microsoft Windows Windows Server 2008 pour systèmes x64 Service Pack 2 ;
Microsoft Windows Windows Server 2008 pour systèmes Itanium Service Pack 2 ;
Microsoft Windows Windows 7 pour systèmes 32 bits et Windows 7 pour systèmes 32 bits Service Pack 1 ;

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Windows Vista Service Pack 2 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Windows Vista \u00c9dition x64 Service Pack 2 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Windows Server 2008 pour syst\u00e8mes 32 bits Service Pack 2 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Windows Server 2008 R2 pour syst\u00e8mes Itanium et Windows Server 2008 R2 pour syst\u00e8mes Itanium Service Pack 1.",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Windows 7 pour syst\u00e8mes x64 et Windows 7 pour syst\u00e8mes x64 Service Pack 1 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Windows Server 2008 R2 pour syst\u00e8mes x64 et Windows Server 2008 R2 pour syst\u00e8mes x64 Service Pack 1 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Windows Server 2008 pour syst\u00e8mes x64 Service Pack 2 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Windows Server 2008 pour syst\u00e8mes Itanium Service Pack 2 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Windows 7 pour syst\u00e8mes 32 bits et Windows 7 pour syst\u00e8mes 32 bits Service Pack 1 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nDeux failles ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans la pile TCP/IP de Microsoft Windows\n:\n\n-   une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans le traitement de messages ICMP permet \u00e0 une\n    personne malintentionn\u00e9e de r\u00e9aliser un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance\n    (CVE-2011-1871) ;\n-   une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans le traitement d\u0027URL en m\u00e9moire, lorsque la\n    qualit\u00e9 de service bas\u00e9e sur les URL est activ\u00e9e, permet \u00e0 un\n    attaquant distant d\u0027effectuer un d\u00e9ni de service (CVE-2011-1965) ;\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-1965",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1965"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-1871",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1871"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2011-08-10T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2011-08-10T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Microsoft MS11-064 du 09 ao\u00fbt 2011 :",
      "url": "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS11-064.mspx"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Microsoft MS11-064 du 09 ao\u00fbt 2011 :",
      "url": "http://www.microsoft.com/france/technet/security/Bulletin/MS11-064.mspx"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2011-AVI-440",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2011-08-10T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Deux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans la pile TCP/IP de Microsoft Windows permettent\nde r\u00e9aliser un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans la pile TCP/IP de Microsoft Windows",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin Microsoft MS11-064 du 09 ao\u00fbt 2011",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.