CERTA-2011-AVI-256
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2011-04-27 - Updated: 2011-04-27
Deux vulnérabilités permettant à un utilisateur malintentionné d'injecter indirectement du code à distance ont été indentifiées dans CA Arcot WebFort Versatile Authentication Server.
Description
Deux vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans CA Arcot WebFort Versatile Authentication Server. Elle permettent à une personne malintentionnée d'injecter indirectement du code à distance.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
CA Arcot WebFort Versatile Authentication Server (VAS) antérieur à la version 6.2.5.
| Vendor | Product | Description |
|---|
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [],
"affected_systems_content": "\u003cp\u003eCA Arcot WebFort Versatile Authentication Server (VAS) ant\u00e9rieur \u00e0 la version 6.2.5.\u003c/p\u003e",
"content": "## Description\n\nDeux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans CA Arcot WebFort Versatile\nAuthentication Server. Elle permettent \u00e0 une personne malintentionn\u00e9e\nd\u0027injecter indirectement du code \u00e0 distance.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2011-1825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2011-1826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1826"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2011-04-27T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2011-04-27T00:00:00",
"links": [
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 CA technologies du 26 avril 2011 :",
"url": "https://support.ca.com/irj/portal/anonymous/phpsupcontent?contentID={A71F5839-D214-4719-B918-4476E4537998}"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2011-AVI-256",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2011-04-27T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Injection de code indirecte \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": "Deux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s permettant \u00e0 un utilisateur malintentionn\u00e9\nd\u0027injecter indirectement du code \u00e0 distance ont \u00e9t\u00e9 indentifi\u00e9es dans\n\u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eCA Arcot WebFort Versatile Authentication\nServer\u003c/span\u003e.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans CA Arcot WebFort Versatile Authentication Server",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 CA technologies CA20110426-01",
"url": null
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.