CERTA-2011-AVI-206
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2011-04-13 - Updated: 2011-04-13
Deux vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Office permettent l'exécution de code arbitraire à distance.
Description
Deux vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Microsoft Office :
- une faille est liée à la façon dont sont chargées les bibliothèques dynamiques (CVE-2011-0107) ;
- lors du traitement d'un fichier Office contenant des objets graphiques, les structures de données de déréférencement ne sont pas correctement gérées (CVE-2011-0977).
L'exploitation de ces vulnérabilités permet l'exécution de code arbitraire à distance.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Office | Microsoft Office 2007 Service Pack 2 ; | ||
| Microsoft | Office | Microsoft Office XP Service Pack 3 ; | ||
| Microsoft | Office | Convertisseur de formats de fichier Open XML pour Mac. | ||
| Microsoft | Office | Microsoft Office 2003 Service Pack 3 ; | ||
| Microsoft | Office | Microsoft Office 2008 pour Mac ; | ||
| Microsoft | Office | Microsoft Office 2004 pour Mac ; |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Microsoft Office 2007 Service Pack 2 ;",
"product": {
"name": "Office",
"vendor": {
"name": "Microsoft",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Microsoft Office XP Service Pack 3 ;",
"product": {
"name": "Office",
"vendor": {
"name": "Microsoft",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Convertisseur de formats de fichier Open XML pour Mac.",
"product": {
"name": "Office",
"vendor": {
"name": "Microsoft",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Microsoft Office 2003 Service Pack 3 ;",
"product": {
"name": "Office",
"vendor": {
"name": "Microsoft",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Microsoft Office 2008 pour Mac ;",
"product": {
"name": "Office",
"vendor": {
"name": "Microsoft",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Microsoft Office 2004 pour Mac ;",
"product": {
"name": "Office",
"vendor": {
"name": "Microsoft",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Description\n\nDeux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans Microsoft Office :\n\n- une faille est li\u00e9e \u00e0 la fa\u00e7on dont sont charg\u00e9es les biblioth\u00e8ques\n dynamiques (CVE-2011-0107) ;\n- lors du traitement d\u0027un fichier Office contenant des objets\n graphiques, les structures de donn\u00e9es de d\u00e9r\u00e9f\u00e9rencement ne sont pas\n correctement g\u00e9r\u00e9es (CVE-2011-0977).\n\nL\u0027exploitation de ces vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s permet l\u0027ex\u00e9cution de code\narbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2011-0107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-0107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2011-0977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-0977"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2011-04-13T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2011-04-13T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTA-2011-AVI-206",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2011-04-13T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": "Deux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eMicrosoft Office\u003c/span\u003e\npermettent l\u0027ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Microsoft Office",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Microsoft MS11-023 du 12 avril 2011",
"url": "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS11-023.mspx"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.