CERTA-2011-AVI-198

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2011-04-11 - Updated: 2011-04-11

Deux vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans RoundCube. La première permet l'injection de requêtes illégitimes par rebond, et la seconde de contourner la politique de sécurité ce qui permet à un utilisateur malveillant d'utiliser RoundCube comme relai de messagerie.

Description

Une vulnérabilité permettant l'injection de requêtes illégitimes par rebond lors de la connexion a été corrigée dans RoundCube. Également, une vulnérabilité qui, lorsqu'elle est exploitée, permet à un utilisateur malveillant de contourner la politique de sécurité afin de passer des commandes illégitimes, a été corrigée.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

Roundcube versions 0.5 et inférieures.

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cP\u003eRoundcube versions 0.5 et inf\u00e9rieures.\u003c/P\u003e",
  "content": "## Description\n\nUne vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 permettant l\u0027injection de requ\u00eates ill\u00e9gitimes par\nrebond lors de la connexion a \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9e dans RoundCube. \u00c9galement,\nune vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 qui, lorsqu\u0027elle est exploit\u00e9e, permet \u00e0 un\nutilisateur malveillant de contourner la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 afin de\npasser des commandes ill\u00e9gitimes, a \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9e.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-1492",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1492"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2011-04-11T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2011-04-11T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Ensemble de modification 4490 du 03 f\u00e9vrier 2011 :",
      "url": "http://trac.roundcube.net/changeset/4490"
    },
    {
      "title": "Ensemble de modification 4488 du 03 f\u00e9vrier 2011 :",
      "url": "http://trac.roundcube.net/changeset/4488"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2011-AVI-198",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2011-04-11T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Injection de requ\u00eates ill\u00e9gitimes par rebond (CSRF)"
    },
    {
      "description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Deux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans RoundCube. La premi\u00e8re permet\nl\u0027injection de requ\u00eates ill\u00e9gitimes par rebond, et la seconde de\ncontourner la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 ce qui permet \u00e0 un utilisateur\nmalveillant d\u0027utiliser RoundCube comme relai de messagerie.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans RoundCube",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Liste des modifications apport\u00e9es \u00e0 RoundCube 0.5.1",
      "url": "http://trac.roundcube.net/wiki/Changelog"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.