CERTA-2011-AVI-168
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2011-03-24 - Updated: 2011-03-24
Deux vulnérabilités permettant un déni de service à distance ont été corrigées dans la dernière version de Quagga.
Description
Deux vulnérabilités permettant un déni de service à distance ont été corrigées dans le démon bgpd de Quagga.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Quagga versions antérieures à 0.99.18.
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Description |
|---|
References
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [],
"affected_systems_content": "\u003cp\u003eQuagga versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 0.99.18.\u003c/p\u003e",
"content": "## Description\n\nDeux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s permettant un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance ont \u00e9t\u00e9\ncorrig\u00e9es dans le d\u00e9mon bgpd de Quagga.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2010-1675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-1675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2010-1674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-1674"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2011-03-24T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2011-03-24T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTA-2011-AVI-168",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2011-03-24T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": "Deux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s permettant un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance ont \u00e9t\u00e9\ncorrig\u00e9es dans la derni\u00e8re version de Quagga.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Quagga",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Note de version Quagga du 21 mars 2011",
"url": "http://www.quagga.net/news2.php?y=2011\u0026m=3\u0026d=21#id1300723200"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…