CERTA-2010-AVI-579
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2010-12-06 - Updated: 2010-12-06
Des vulnérabilités affectent AWStats dont certaines permettent à un utilisateur malveillant d'exécuter du code à distance.
Description
Des vulnérabilités affectent AWStats :
- l'acceptation par awstat.cgi d'un chemin vers un fichier de configuration dans l'adresse réticulaire (URL) permet à un utilisateur malveillant d'exécuter du code à distance au moyen d'un fichier de configuration malveillant dans un répertoire NFS ou WebDAV ;
- le même problème est également présent sous Windows avec les fichiers partagés ;
- l'utilisation de LoadPlugin permet à un utilisateur malveillant de parcourir une partie non autorisée de l'arborescence des fichiers.
Solution
La version 7.0 d'AWStats corrige ces problèmes.
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
AWStats 6.95 et versions antérieures.
| Vendor | Product | Description |
|---|
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |
|---|---|---|---|
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [],
"affected_systems_content": "\u003cp\u003eAWStats 6.95 et versions ant\u00e9rieures.\u003c/p\u003e",
"content": "## Description\n\nDes vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s affectent AWStats\u00a0:\n\n- l\u0027acceptation par awstat.cgi d\u0027un chemin vers un fichier de\n configuration dans l\u0027adresse r\u00e9ticulaire (URL) permet \u00e0 un\n utilisateur malveillant d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code \u00e0 distance au moyen d\u0027un\n fichier de configuration malveillant dans un r\u00e9pertoire NFS ou\n WebDAV\u00a0;\n- le m\u00eame probl\u00e8me est \u00e9galement pr\u00e9sent sous Windows avec les\n fichiers partag\u00e9s\u00a0;\n- l\u0027utilisation de LoadPlugin permet \u00e0 un utilisateur malveillant de\n parcourir une partie non autoris\u00e9e de l\u0027arborescence des fichiers.\n\n## Solution\n\nLa version 7.0 d\u0027AWStats corrige ces probl\u00e8mes.\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2010-4369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-4369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2010-4368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-4368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2010-4367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-4367"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2010-12-06T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2010-12-06T00:00:00",
"links": [
{
"title": "Note de vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 de l\u0027US-CERT VU#870532 du 30 novembre 2010 :",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/870532"
},
{
"title": "Site de t\u00e9l\u00e9chargement du projet AWStats :",
"url": "http://awstats.sourceforge.net"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2010-AVI-579",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2010-12-06T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": "Des vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s affectent AWStats dont certaines permettent \u00e0 un\nutilisateur malveillant d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code \u00e0 distance.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans AWStats",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Note de vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 de l\u0027US-CERT VU#870532 du 30 novembre 2010",
"url": null
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.