CERTA-2010-AVI-540

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2010-11-08 - Updated: 2010-11-08

Une vulnérabilité dans Cisco Unified Communications Manager permet à un utilisateur local malveillant d'élever ses privilèges.

Description

Cisco Unified Communications Manager comprend un exécutable, avec l'attribut setuid, qui ne gère pas correctement une option en ligne de commande. Cette vulnérabilité peut être exploitée par un utilisateur local malveillant pour élever ses privilèges.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Cisco Unified Communications Manager Cisco Unified Communications Manager 7.x ;
Cisco Unified Communications Manager Cisco Unified Communications Manager 6.x.
Cisco Unified Communications Manager Cisco Unified Communications Manager 8.x ;
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard Create KEV Entry 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Cisco Unified Communications Manager 7.x ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Unified Communications Manager",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Cisco Unified Communications Manager 6.x.",
      "product": {
        "name": "Unified Communications Manager",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Cisco Unified Communications Manager 8.x ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Unified Communications Manager",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nCisco Unified Communications Manager comprend un ex\u00e9cutable, avec\nl\u0027attribut setuid, qui ne g\u00e8re pas correctement une option en ligne de\ncommande. Cette vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 peut \u00eatre exploit\u00e9e par un utilisateur\nlocal malveillant pour \u00e9lever ses privil\u00e8ges.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2010-3039",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-3039"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2010-11-08T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2010-11-08T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Alerte de vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 21656 Cisco du 03 novembre 2010 :",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=21656"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2010-AVI-540",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2010-11-08T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Cisco Unified Communications Manager permet \u00e0 un\nutilisateur local malveillant d\u0027\u00e9lever ses privil\u00e8ges.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Cisco Unified Communications Manager",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Alerte de vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 Cisco 21656 du 03 novembre 2010",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.