CERTA-2010-AVI-448
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2010-09-21 - Updated: 2010-09-21
Une vulnérabilité présente dans Mac OS X permet à un utilisateur distant de contourner la politique de sécurité du système vulnérable.
Description
Une erreur relative à la mise en œuvre du protocole AFP (Apple Filing Protocol) est présente dans le système d'exploitation Mac OS X ''Snow Leopard'' (versions 10.6.x). Elle permet à un utilisateur distant, ayant connaissance d'au moins un nom d'utilisateur valide sur la machine vulnérable, de se dispenser du mot de passe associé pour accéder à des partages AFP.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Mac OS X versions 10.6.x.
| Vendor | Product | Description |
|---|
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [],
"affected_systems_content": "\u003cp\u003eMac OS X versions 10.6.x.\u003c/p\u003e",
"content": "## Description\n\nUne erreur relative \u00e0 la mise en \u0153uvre du protocole AFP (Apple Filing\nProtocol) est pr\u00e9sente dans le syst\u00e8me d\u0027exploitation Mac OS X \u0027\u0027Snow\nLeopard\u0027\u0027 (versions 10.6.x). Elle permet \u00e0 un utilisateur distant, ayant\nconnaissance d\u0027au moins un nom d\u0027utilisateur valide sur la machine\nvuln\u00e9rable, de se dispenser du mot de passe associ\u00e9 pour acc\u00e9der \u00e0 des\npartages AFP.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2010-1820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-1820"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2010-09-21T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2010-09-21T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTA-2010-AVI-448",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2010-09-21T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
}
],
"summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 pr\u00e9sente dans Mac OS X permet \u00e0 un utilisateur distant\nde contourner la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 du syst\u00e8me vuln\u00e9rable.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Mac OS X",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Apple HT4361 du 20 septembre 2010",
"url": "http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=HT4361"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.