CERTA-2010-AVI-407

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2010-08-26 - Updated: 2010-08-26

Deux vulnérabilités dans Cisco Unified Communications Manager permettent à une personne distante malintentionnée de provoquer un déni de service.

Description

Deux vulnérabilités dans le traitement de messages SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) permettent à une personne distante malintentionnée de provoquer un déni de service par l'envoi de paquets spécialement construits sur les ports 5060/tcp, 5061/tcp, 5060/udp ou 5061/udp.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Cisco Unified Communications Manager Cisco Unified Communications Manager 7.x ;
Cisco Unified Communications Manager Cisco Unified Communications Manager 6.x ;
Cisco Unified Communications Manager Cisco Unified Communications Manager 8.x.
References

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Cisco Unified Communications Manager 7.x ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Unified Communications Manager",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Cisco Unified Communications Manager 6.x ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Unified Communications Manager",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Cisco Unified Communications Manager 8.x.",
      "product": {
        "name": "Unified Communications Manager",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nDeux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le traitement de messages SIP (Session\nInitiation Protocol) permettent \u00e0 une personne distante malintentionn\u00e9e\nde provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service par l\u0027envoi de paquets sp\u00e9cialement\nconstruits sur les ports 5060/tcp, 5061/tcp, 5060/udp ou 5061/udp.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2010-2838",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-2838"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2010-2837",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-2837"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2010-08-26T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2010-08-26T00:00:00",
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2010-AVI-407",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2010-08-26T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Deux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Cisco Unified Communications Manager permettent\n\u00e0 une personne distante malintentionn\u00e9e de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Cisco Unified Communications Manager",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco 20100825-cucm du 25 ao\u00fbt 2010",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20100825-cucm.shtml"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…