CERTA-2010-AVI-309
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2010-07-13 - Updated: 2010-07-13
Deux vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans GNU gv.
Description
Deux vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans GNU gv :
- une erreur dans le traitement de fichiers temporaires permet à une personne malintentionnée d'écraser des fichiers arbitraires ;
- une faille peut être exploitée afin d'exécuter des commandes postscript arbitraires lorsqu'un utilisateur ouvre un document spécialement conçu.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
GNU gv versions antérieures à 3.7.0.
| Vendor | Product | Description |
|---|
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [],
"affected_systems_content": "\u003cP\u003eGNU gv versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.7.0.\u003c/P\u003e",
"content": "## Description\n\nDeux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans GNU gv :\n\n- une erreur dans le traitement de fichiers temporaires permet \u00e0 une\n personne malintentionn\u00e9e d\u0027\u00e9craser des fichiers arbitraires ;\n- une faille peut \u00eatre exploit\u00e9e afin d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter des commandes\n postscript arbitraires lorsqu\u0027un utilisateur ouvre un document\n sp\u00e9cialement con\u00e7u.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2010-2056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-2056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2010-2055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-2055"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2010-07-13T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2010-07-13T00:00:00",
"links": [
{
"title": "Notes de mise \u00e0 jour de la version 3.7.0 du 06 juin 2010 :",
"url": "http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=6368"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2010-AVI-309",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2010-07-13T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "Deux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans GNU gv.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans GNU gv",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Notes de version de GNU gv 3.7.0 du 06 juin 2010",
"url": null
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.