CERTA-2010-AVI-166

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2010-04-13 - Updated: 2010-04-13

Une vulnérabilité dans la gestion des archives 7Z, GZIP, CAB ou RAR permet de contourner le moteur de détection de l'Anti-Virus.

Description

Une vulnérabilité dans les produits F-Secure permet, à une personne malveillante, de construire des archives (7Z, GZIP, CAB ou RAR) spécialement formées contournant le moteur de détection de l'Anti-Virus. Les fichiers malveillants contenus dans ces archives ne seront donc pas détectés.

Cependant cela n'affecte pas le mécanisme de détection lorsque ces fichiers sont extraits des archives.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
ESET Security Solutions basées sur F-Secure Protection Service pour Business - Workstation security version 9 et antérieures ;
Microsoft Windows F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper pour Windows 6.61 et antérieures ;
N/A N/A F-Secure Anti-Virus pour Linux Servers 4.65 ;
ESET N/A F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper pour Linux 4.02 et antérieures ;
N/A N/A Services basés sur F-Secure Mac Protection build 8060 et antérieures ;
ESET Security F-Secure Anti-Virus Linux Client Security 5.54 et antérieures ;
ESET Server Security F-Secure Anti-Virus Linux Server Security 5.54 et antérieures ;
ESET Security F-Secure Linux Security 7.03 et antérieures ;
ESET N/A F-Secure Anti-Virus pour Workstations 9 et antérieures ;
Microsoft N/A F-Secure Anti-Virus pour Microsoft Exchange 9 et antérieures ;
ESET Server Security Solutions basées sur F-Secure Protection Service pour Business - Server Security version 8 et antérieures ;
Citrix N/A F-Secure Anti-Virus pour Citrix Servers 9 et antérieures.
ESET N/A F-Secure Anti-Virus 2010 et antérieures ;
ESET N/A F-Secure Anti-Virus pour MIMEsweeper 5.61 et antérieures ;
Microsoft Windows F-Secure Anti-Virus pour Windows Servers 9 et antérieures ;
ESET Security F-Secure Client Security 9 et antérieures ;
ESET N/A Solutions basées sur F-Secure Protection Service pour Consumers version 9 et antérieures ;
ESET Server Security F-Secure Home Server Security 2009 ;
References

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Solutions bas\u00e9es sur F-Secure Protection Service pour Business - Workstation security version 9 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Security",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "ESET",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper pour Windows 6.61 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus pour Linux Servers 4.65 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper pour Linux 4.02 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "ESET",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Services bas\u00e9s sur F-Secure Mac Protection build 8060 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus Linux Client Security 5.54 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Security",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "ESET",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus Linux Server Security 5.54 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Server Security",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "ESET",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "F-Secure Linux Security 7.03 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Security",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "ESET",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus pour Workstations 9 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "ESET",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus pour Microsoft Exchange 9 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Solutions bas\u00e9es sur F-Secure Protection Service pour Business - Server Security version 8 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Server Security",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "ESET",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus pour Citrix Servers 9 et ant\u00e9rieures.",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Citrix",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus 2010 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "ESET",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus pour MIMEsweeper 5.61 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "ESET",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus pour Windows Servers 9 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "F-Secure Client Security 9 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Security",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "ESET",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Solutions bas\u00e9es sur F-Secure Protection Service pour Consumers version 9 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "ESET",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "F-Secure Home Server Security 2009 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Server Security",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "ESET",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nUne vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans les produits F-Secure permet, \u00e0 une personne\nmalveillante, de construire des archives (7Z, GZIP, CAB ou RAR)\nsp\u00e9cialement form\u00e9es contournant le moteur de d\u00e9tection de l\u0027Anti-Virus.\nLes fichiers malveillants contenus dans ces archives ne seront donc pas\nd\u00e9tect\u00e9s.\n\nCependant cela n\u0027affecte pas le m\u00e9canisme de d\u00e9tection lorsque ces\nfichiers sont extraits des archives.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [],
  "initial_release_date": "2010-04-13T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2010-04-13T00:00:00",
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2010-AVI-166",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2010-04-13T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans la gestion des archives \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003e7Z,\nGZIP, CAB\u003c/span\u003e ou \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eRAR\u003c/span\u003e permet de contourner\nle moteur de d\u00e9tection de l\u0027\u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eAnti-Virus\u003c/span\u003e.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans F-Secure",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 F-Secure FSC-2010-1 du 12 avril 2010",
      "url": "http://www.f-secure.com/en_EMEA/support/security-advisory/fsc-2010-1.html"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.