CERTA-2009-AVI-463

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2009-10-28 - Updated: 2009-10-28

Plusieurs vulnérabilités présentes dans Wireshark permettent à un utilisateur distant malintentionné de provoquer un déni de service.

Description

Plusieurs vulnérabilités sont présentes dans Wireshark :

  • La première (CVE-2009-2560), n'affectant pas les versions supérieures à 1.2.0, concerne l'analyseur de protocole RADIUS ;
  • la seconde (CVE-2009-3549), n'affectant que la branche 1.2.x, est relative à l'analyseur de protocole Paltalk ;
  • la troisième (CVE-2009-3550) concerne l'analyseur de protocole DCERPC/NT ;
  • la dernière (CVE-2009-3551), n'affectant que la branche 1.2.x, est relative à l'analyseur de protocole SMB.

Toutes ces vulnérabilités permettent à un utilisateur distant malintentionné de provoquer un déni de service de l'application vulnérable.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Wireshark Wireshark Wireshark 1.2.x.
Wireshark Wireshark Wireshark 0.10.x ;
Wireshark Wireshark Wireshark 1.0.x ;
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Wireshark 1.2.x.",
      "product": {
        "name": "Wireshark",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Wireshark",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Wireshark 0.10.x ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Wireshark",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Wireshark",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Wireshark 1.0.x ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Wireshark",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Wireshark",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nPlusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s sont pr\u00e9sentes dans Wireshark :\n\n-   La premi\u00e8re (CVE-2009-2560), n\u0027affectant pas les versions\n    sup\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.2.0, concerne l\u0027analyseur de protocole RADIUS ;\n-   la seconde (CVE-2009-3549), n\u0027affectant que la branche 1.2.x, est\n    relative \u00e0 l\u0027analyseur de protocole Paltalk ;\n-   la troisi\u00e8me (CVE-2009-3550) concerne l\u0027analyseur de protocole\n    DCERPC/NT ;\n-   la derni\u00e8re (CVE-2009-3551), n\u0027affectant que la branche 1.2.x, est\n    relative \u00e0 l\u0027analyseur de protocole SMB.\n\nToutes ces vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s permettent \u00e0 un utilisateur distant\nmalintentionn\u00e9 de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service de l\u0027application\nvuln\u00e9rable.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2009-3549",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-3549"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2009-3550",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-3550"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2009-2560",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-2560"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2009-3551",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-3551"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2009-10-28T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2009-10-28T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletins de s\u00e9curit\u00e9s Wireshark wnpa-sec-2009-07 et    wnpa-sec-2009-08 du 26 octobre 2009 :",
      "url": "http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2009-08.html"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletins de s\u00e9curit\u00e9s Wireshark wnpa-sec-2009-07 et    wnpa-sec-2009-08 du 26 octobre 2009 :",
      "url": "http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2009-07.html"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2009-AVI-463",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2009-10-28T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s pr\u00e9sentes dans Wireshark permettent \u00e0 un\nutilisateur distant malintentionn\u00e9 de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service.\n",
  "title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Wireshark",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletins de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Wireshark wnpa-sec-2009-07 et wnpa-sec-2009-08 du 26 octobre 2009",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.